CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00497796Updated Jun 11, 2021Results posted

Maribavir Versus Oral Ganciclovir For The Prevention of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Disease in Liver Transplant Recipients

A Phase 3 interventional study of maribavir and ganciclovir in Cytomegalovirus Infections, sponsored by Shire. Completed at 55 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-11.

Sponsored by Shire · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
307
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research study is to investigate whether or not oral maribavir is safe and effective compared to oral ganciclovir for preventing CMV disease when administered for up to 14 weeks in patients who have had a liver transplant.

Read the detailed description

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections remain a significant problem following various types of transplants that are associated with strong immunosuppressive therapy. Maribavir is a new oral anti-CMV drug with a novel mechanism of action compared to currently available anti-CMV drugs. This study will test the safety and efficacy of maribavir for the prevention of CMV disease when given as prophylaxis for up to 14 weeks following orthotopic liver transplantation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cytomegalovirus Infections

Keywords

  • cytomegalovirus
  • CMV
  • prophylaxis
  • liver
  • liver transplant
03

In context

Cytomegalovirus Infections

359 studies on the registry are indexed under Cytomegalovirus Infections; 59 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 307 is above the median of 60 across 233 interventional studies indexed under Cytomegalovirus Infections.

Browse Cytomegalovirus Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Shire is the lead sponsor of 346 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 47 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 47 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Orthotopic liver transplant recipient
  • Donor CMV seropositive / Recipient CMV seronegative
  • Enrolled within 10 days after liver transplant
  • Able to swallow tablets

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Multiple organ transplant
  • HIV infection
  • CMV disease
  • Use of other anti-CMV therapy at time of enrollment
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
307 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    Drug: maribavir

  • Active comparator
    2

    Drug: ganciclovir

Interventions

  • Drugmaribavir

    100mg twice a day for 14 weeks.

  • Drugganciclovir

    1000mg three times per day for 14 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Endpoint Committee (EC)-Confirmed Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Disease Within 6 Months Post-Transplantation

    All investigator-determined (protocol-defined) cases of CMV disease (i.e., symptomatic CMV infection or CMV organ disease), were adjudicated by an independent, blinded EC. Symptomatic CMV infection was defined as: CMV infection detected by a positive result from a CMV laboratory assay from at least one central laboratory assay (pp65 antigenemia or CMV DNA polymerase chain reaction \[PCR\] assay in plasma) and fever \>/=38 °C on \>/=2 occasions \>/=24 hours apart within a 7-day period and at least one of the following: new or increased malaise, two successive measurements of leucopenia (white blood cell \[WBC\] count \<3500/mm3 or a WBC count decrease of 20% if the cell count prior to onset of clinical symptoms was \>4000/mm3) \>/=24 hours apart, atypical lymphocytosis \>/=5%, and thrombocytopenia. CMV organ disease was defined as described by Ljungman et al., 2002.

    Time frame: 6 months post-transplant

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With CMV Infection or EC-confirmed CMV Disease Within 6 Months Post-Transplantation

    Incidence of CMV infection or EC-confirmed CMV disease within the 6-month post-transplant period included in this section were defined (1) with infection assessed by pp65 antigenemia assay; (2) with infection assessed by CMV DNA PCR; (3) with infection assessed by either assay (pp65 antigenemia or CMV DNA PCR); and (4) with infection assessed by initiation of anti-CMV therapy.

    Time frame: 6 months post-transplant

  2. Time to Onset of CMV Infection or EC-confirmed CMV Disease Within 6 Months Post-Transplantation

    All investigator-determined (protocol-defined) cases of CMV disease (i.e., symptomatic CMV infection or CMV organ disease) were adjudicated by an independent, blinded EC. CMV infection was assessed by pp65 Antigenemia or CMV DNA PCR from a central or local lab. CMV organ disease was defined as described by Ljungman et al., 2002.

    Time frame: 6 months post-transplant

  3. Number of Participants With Investigator-determined CMV Disease

    Symptomatic CMV infection was defined as: CMV infection detected by a positive result from a CMV laboratory assay from at least one central laboratory assay (pp65 antigenemia or CMV DNA polymerase chain reaction \[PCR\] assay in plasma) and fever \>/=38 °C on \>/=2 occasions \>/=24 hours apart within a 7-day period and at least one of the following: new or increased malaise, two successive measurements of leucopenia (white blood cell \[WBC\] count \<3500/mm3 or a WBC count decrease of 20% if the cell count prior to onset of clinical symptoms was \>4000/mm3) \>/=24 hours apart, atypical lymphocytosis \>/=5%, and thrombocytopenia. CMV organ disease was defined as described by Ljungman et al., 2002.

    Time frame: Through 6 months post-transplant (Day 1 to 100 days and 6 months post-transplant)

  4. Number of Participants With EC-confirmed CMV Disease Within 100 Days Post-Transplantation

    All investigator-determined (protocol-defined) cases of CMV disease (i.e., symptomatic CMV infection or CMV organ disease), were adjudicated by an independent, blinded EC. Symptomatic CMV infection was defined as: CMV infection detected by a positive result from a CMV laboratory assay from at least one central laboratory assay (pp65 antigenemia or CMV DNA polymerase chain reaction \[PCR\] assay in plasma) and fever \>/=38 °C on \>/=2 occasions \>/=24 hours apart within a 7-day period and at least one of the following: new or increased malaise, two successive measurements of leucopenia (white blood cell \[WBC\] count \<3500/mm3 or a WBC count decrease of 20% if the cell count prior to onset of clinical symptoms was \>4000/mm3) \>/=24 hours apart, atypical lymphocytosis \>/=5%, and thrombocytopenia. CMV organ disease was defined as described by Ljungman et al., 2002.

    Time frame: 100 days post-transplant

  5. Number of Participants With CMV Infection or EC-confirmed CMV Disease Within 100 Days Post-Transplantation

    Incidence of CMV infection or EC-confirmed CMV disease within the 6-month post-transplant period included in this section were defined (1) with infection assessed by pp65 antigenemia assay; (2) with infection assessed by CMV DNA PCR; (3) with infection assessed by either assay (pp65 antigenemia or CMV DNA PCR); and (4) with infection assessed by initiation of anti-CMV therapy.

    Time frame: 100 days post-transplant

  6. Number of Participants With Retransplantation

    Time frame: Through 6 months post-transplant (From Day 1 to 100 days and 6 months post-transplant)

  7. Number of Participants With Graft Failure Related Death

    Time frame: Through 6 months post-transplant (From Day 1 to 100 days and 6 months post-transplant)

  8. Number of Participants With Acute Graft Rejection

    Rejection was assessed by examining a liver biopsy sample. Diagnosis of graft rejection included a global assessment grade and a rejection activity index score.

    Time frame: 26 weeks post-transplant

  9. Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months Post-Transplantation

    Time frame: 6 months post-transplant

  10. Percent of Participants With Signs of Bone Marrow Suppression

    Bone marrow suppression was assessed by the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) of investigator-reported leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and pancytopenia; absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \<1000/mm3; white blood cell (WBC) count toxicity grade shifts from 0-2 at baseline to a maximum of 3-4 post-baseline; and use of hematopoietic growth factors during the 6 month post-transplant period.

    Time frame: 15 weeks

  11. Plasma Concentration of Maribavir During Treatment

    For the first 16 subjects to have PK profiling performed, PK sampling was collected at Weeks 2, 6 and 10. For subsequent subjects that have PK profiling performed, PK sampling was collected at Weeks 2 and 6. Samples were collected 12 hours after the morning dose of maribavir. Permissible assessment windows for pharmacokinetic profile sampling purposes were +/- 5 days for each sampling day. Samples for determination of maribavir concentration were analyzed by a validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method. For plasma, the minimum detectable concentration for maribavir was 0.2 μg/mL.

    Time frame: 12 hours post-dose after 2, 6, and 10 weeks of treatment

  12. Plasma Concentration of Maribavir Metabolite VP 44469 During Treatment

    For the first 16 subjects to have PK profiling performed, PK sampling was collected at Weeks 2, 6 and 10. For subsequent subjects that have PK profiling performed, PK sampling was collected at Weeks 2 and 6. Samples were collected 12 hours after the morning dose of maribavir. Permissible assessment windows for pharmacokinetic profile sampling purposes were +/- 5 days for each sampling day. Samples for determination of VP 44469 (a metabolite of maribavir) concentration were analyzed by a validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method. For plasma, the minimum detectable concentration for VP 44469 was 0.2 μg/mL.

    Time frame: 12 hours post-dose after 2, 6, and 10 weeks of treatment

07

Results

Posted Jun 4, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMaribavir 100 mg BIDGanciclovir 1000 mg TID
Started147160
Completed62101
Not completed8559
Withdrew: Adverse event (not related)99
Withdrew: Adverse event (related)54
Withdrew: Cmv infection or disease treatment304
Withdrew: Consent withdrawn103
Withdrew: Investigator/sponsor discretion3134
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01
Withdrew: Not applicable (randomized not treated)04

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Endpoint Committee (EC)-Confirmed Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Disease Within 6 Months Post-Transplantation

All investigator-determined (protocol-defined) cases of CMV disease (i.e., symptomatic CMV infection or CMV organ disease), were adjudicated by an independent, blinded EC. Symptomatic CMV infection was defined as: CMV infection detected by a positive result from a CMV laboratory assay from at least one central laboratory assay (pp65 antigenemia or CMV DNA polymerase chain reaction \[PCR\] assay in plasma) and fever \>/=38 °C on \>/=2 occasions \>/=24 hours apart within a 7-day period and at least one of the following: new or increased malaise, two successive measurements of leucopenia (white blood cell \[WBC\] count \<3500/mm3 or a WBC count decrease of 20% if the cell count prior to onset of clinical symptoms was \>4000/mm3) \>/=24 hours apart, atypical lymphocytosis \>/=5%, and thrombocytopenia. CMV organ disease was defined as described by Ljungman et al., 2002.

Time frame:
6 months post-transplant
Reported as:
Number · number of participants with event
Number of Participants With Endpoint Committee (EC)-Confirmed Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Disease Within 6 Months Post-Transplantation
number of participants with eventMaribavir 100 mg BIDGanciclovir 1000 mg TID
Number of Participants With Endpoint Committee (EC)-Confirmed Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Disease Within 6 Months Post-Transplantation1410
Statistical analysis
  • Maribavir 100 mg BID vs Ganciclovir 1000 mg TID · Rate difference: 0.041 · 95% CI -0.038 to 0.119Rate difference is the rate of maribavir minus the rate of ganciclovir
  • Maribavir 100 mg BID vs Ganciclovir 1000 mg TID · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2754 (The p-value is from the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, adjusting for receipt of induction ALA and geographic region (US or Europe).) · Odds ratio (or): 1.586 · 95% CI 0.682 to 3.690
SecondaryNumber of Participants With CMV Infection or EC-confirmed CMV Disease Within 6 Months Post-Transplantation

Incidence of CMV infection or EC-confirmed CMV disease within the 6-month post-transplant period included in this section were defined (1) with infection assessed by pp65 antigenemia assay; (2) with infection assessed by CMV DNA PCR; (3) with infection assessed by either assay (pp65 antigenemia or CMV DNA PCR); and (4) with infection assessed by initiation of anti-CMV therapy.

Time frame:
6 months post-transplant
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With CMV Infection or EC-confirmed CMV Disease Within 6 Months Post-Transplantation
participantsMaribavir 100 mg BIDGanciclovir 1000 mg TID
pp65 antigenemia assay6349
CMV DNA PCR assay7252
pp65 antigenemia or CMV DNA PCR assay8164
Initiation of anti-CMV therapy4639
Statistical analysis
  • Maribavir 100 mg BID vs Ganciclovir 1000 mg TID · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0283 (The p-value is from the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, adjusting for receipt of induction ALA and geographic region (US or Europe).) · Odds ratio (or): 1.793 · 95% CI 1.065 to 3.020Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio for maribavir versus ganciclovir
  • Maribavir 100 mg BID vs Ganciclovir 1000 mg TID · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0024 · Odds ratio (or): 2.284 · 95% CI 1.338 to 3.900Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio for maribavir versus ganciclovir
  • Maribavir 100 mg BID vs Ganciclovir 1000 mg TID · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0053 (The p-value is from the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, adjusting for receipt of induction ALA and geographic region (US or Europe).) · Odds ratio (or): 2.177 · 95% CI 1.259 to 3.767Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio for maribavir versus ganciclovir
  • Maribavir 100 mg BID vs Ganciclovir 1000 mg TID · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2339 (The p-value is from the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, adjusting for receipt of induction ALA and geographic region (US or Europe).) · Odds ratio (or): 1.388 · 95% CI 0.811 to 2.377Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio for maribavir versus ganciclovir
SecondaryTime to Onset of CMV Infection or EC-confirmed CMV Disease Within 6 Months Post-Transplantation

All investigator-determined (protocol-defined) cases of CMV disease (i.e., symptomatic CMV infection or CMV organ disease) were adjudicated by an independent, blinded EC. CMV infection was assessed by pp65 Antigenemia or CMV DNA PCR from a central or local lab. CMV organ disease was defined as described by Ljungman et al., 2002.

Time frame:
6 months post-transplant
Reported as:
Median · days
Time to Onset of CMV Infection or EC-confirmed CMV Disease Within 6 Months Post-Transplantation
daysMaribavir 100 mg BIDGanciclovir 1000 mg TID
Time to Onset of CMV Infection or EC-confirmed CMV Disease Within 6 Months Post-Transplantation45 (41 to 68)127 (125 to 161)
Statistical analysis
  • Maribavir 100 mg BID vs Ganciclovir 1000 mg TID · Log Rank · p = <0.0001 · Adjusted hazard ratio: 2.25 · 95% CI 1.62 to 3.14Maribavir versus ganciclovir; Cox's proportional hazards regression model: time = receipt of induction ALA and geographic region (US or Europe) + treatment.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Investigator-determined CMV Disease

Symptomatic CMV infection was defined as: CMV infection detected by a positive result from a CMV laboratory assay from at least one central laboratory assay (pp65 antigenemia or CMV DNA polymerase chain reaction \[PCR\] assay in plasma) and fever \>/=38 °C on \>/=2 occasions \>/=24 hours apart within a 7-day period and at least one of the following: new or increased malaise, two successive measurements of leucopenia (white blood cell \[WBC\] count \<3500/mm3 or a WBC count decrease of 20% if the cell count prior to onset of clinical symptoms was \>4000/mm3) \>/=24 hours apart, atypical lymphocytosis \>/=5%, and thrombocytopenia. CMV organ disease was defined as described by Ljungman et al., 2002.

Time frame:
Through 6 months post-transplant (Day 1 to 100 days and 6 months post-transplant)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Investigator-determined CMV Disease
participantsMaribavir 100 mg BIDGanciclovir 1000 mg TID
100 days post-transplant173
6 months post-transplant2218
Statistical analysis
  • Maribavir 100 mg BID vs Ganciclovir 1000 mg TID · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0008 (The p-value is from the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, adjusting for receipt of induction ALA and geographic region (US or Europe).)
  • Maribavir 100 mg BID vs Ganciclovir 1000 mg TID · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.3742 (The p-value is from the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, adjusting for receipt of induction ALA and geographic region (US or Europe).)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With EC-confirmed CMV Disease Within 100 Days Post-Transplantation

All investigator-determined (protocol-defined) cases of CMV disease (i.e., symptomatic CMV infection or CMV organ disease), were adjudicated by an independent, blinded EC. Symptomatic CMV infection was defined as: CMV infection detected by a positive result from a CMV laboratory assay from at least one central laboratory assay (pp65 antigenemia or CMV DNA polymerase chain reaction \[PCR\] assay in plasma) and fever \>/=38 °C on \>/=2 occasions \>/=24 hours apart within a 7-day period and at least one of the following: new or increased malaise, two successive measurements of leucopenia (white blood cell \[WBC\] count \<3500/mm3 or a WBC count decrease of 20% if the cell count prior to onset of clinical symptoms was \>4000/mm3) \>/=24 hours apart, atypical lymphocytosis \>/=5%, and thrombocytopenia. CMV organ disease was defined as described by Ljungman et al., 2002.

Time frame:
100 days post-transplant
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With EC-confirmed CMV Disease Within 100 Days Post-Transplantation
participantsMaribavir 100 mg BIDGanciclovir 1000 mg TID
Number of Participants With EC-confirmed CMV Disease Within 100 Days Post-Transplantation100
Statistical analysis
  • Maribavir 100 mg BID vs Ganciclovir 1000 mg TID · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0007 (The p-value is from the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, adjusting for receipt of induction ALA and geographic region (US or Europe).)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With CMV Infection or EC-confirmed CMV Disease Within 100 Days Post-Transplantation

Incidence of CMV infection or EC-confirmed CMV disease within the 6-month post-transplant period included in this section were defined (1) with infection assessed by pp65 antigenemia assay; (2) with infection assessed by CMV DNA PCR; (3) with infection assessed by either assay (pp65 antigenemia or CMV DNA PCR); and (4) with infection assessed by initiation of anti-CMV therapy.

Time frame:
100 days post-transplant
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With CMV Infection or EC-confirmed CMV Disease Within 100 Days Post-Transplantation
participantsMaribavir 100 mg BIDGanciclovir 1000 mg TID
pp65 antigenemia assay4919
CMV DNA PCR assay5918
pp65 antigenemia or CMV DNA PCR assay6824
Initiation of anti-CMV therapy375
Statistical analysis
  • Maribavir 100 mg BID vs Ganciclovir 1000 mg TID · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 (The p-value is from the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, adjusting for receipt of induction ALA and geographic region (US or Europe).) · Odds ratio (or): 4.041 · 95% CI 2.179 to 7.494Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio for maribavir versus ganciclovir
  • Maribavir 100 mg BID vs Ganciclovir 1000 mg TID · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 (The p-value is from the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, adjusting for receipt of induction ALA and geographic region (US or Europe).) · Odds ratio (or): 6.448 · 95% CI 3.404 to 12.213Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio for maribavir versus ganciclovir
  • Maribavir 100 mg BID vs Ganciclovir 1000 mg TID · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 (The p-value is from the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, adjusting for receipt of induction ALA and geographic region (US or Europe).) · Odds ratio (or): 6.020 · 95% CI 3.342 to 10.843Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio for maribavir versus ganciclovir
  • Maribavir 100 mg BID vs Ganciclovir 1000 mg TID · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 (The p-value is from the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, adjusting for receipt of induction ALA and geographic region (US or Europe).) · Odds ratio (or): 11.165 · 95% CI 4.146 to 30.069Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio for maribavir versus ganciclovir
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Retransplantation
Time frame:
Through 6 months post-transplant (From Day 1 to 100 days and 6 months post-transplant)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Retransplantation
participantsMaribavir 100 mg BIDGanciclovir 1000 mg TID
At 100 days post-transplant12
At 6 months post-transplant22
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Graft Failure Related Death
Time frame:
Through 6 months post-transplant (From Day 1 to 100 days and 6 months post-transplant)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Graft Failure Related Death
participantsMaribavir 100 mg BIDGanciclovir 1000 mg TID
100 days post-transplant02
6 months post-transplant12
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Acute Graft Rejection

Rejection was assessed by examining a liver biopsy sample. Diagnosis of graft rejection included a global assessment grade and a rejection activity index score.

Time frame:
26 weeks post-transplant
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Acute Graft Rejection
participantsMaribavir 100 mg BIDGanciclovir 1000 mg TID
100 days post-transplant1619
6 months post-transplant2023
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months Post-Transplantation
Time frame:
6 months post-transplant
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months Post-Transplantation
participantsMaribavir 100 mg BIDGanciclovir 1000 mg TID
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months Post-Transplantation96
SecondaryPercent of Participants With Signs of Bone Marrow Suppression

Bone marrow suppression was assessed by the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) of investigator-reported leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and pancytopenia; absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \<1000/mm3; white blood cell (WBC) count toxicity grade shifts from 0-2 at baseline to a maximum of 3-4 post-baseline; and use of hematopoietic growth factors during the 6 month post-transplant period.

Time frame:
15 weeks
Reported as:
Number · percent of participants
Percent of Participants With Signs of Bone Marrow Suppression
percent of participantsMaribavir 100 mg BIDGanciclovir 1000 mg TID
Hematology AEs1421
ANC <1000/mm3916
WBC count toxicity grade shifts1621
Use of hematopoietic growth factors1520
SecondaryPlasma Concentration of Maribavir During Treatment

For the first 16 subjects to have PK profiling performed, PK sampling was collected at Weeks 2, 6 and 10. For subsequent subjects that have PK profiling performed, PK sampling was collected at Weeks 2 and 6. Samples were collected 12 hours after the morning dose of maribavir. Permissible assessment windows for pharmacokinetic profile sampling purposes were +/- 5 days for each sampling day. Samples for determination of maribavir concentration were analyzed by a validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method. For plasma, the minimum detectable concentration for maribavir was 0.2 μg/mL.

Time frame:
12 hours post-dose after 2, 6, and 10 weeks of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · μg/mL
Plasma Concentration of Maribavir During Treatment
μg/mLMaribavir 100 mg BID
2 weeks, n=101.65 ± 2.01
6 weeks, n=71.36 ± 1.25
10 weeks, n=81.55 ± 1.17
SecondaryPlasma Concentration of Maribavir Metabolite VP 44469 During Treatment

For the first 16 subjects to have PK profiling performed, PK sampling was collected at Weeks 2, 6 and 10. For subsequent subjects that have PK profiling performed, PK sampling was collected at Weeks 2 and 6. Samples were collected 12 hours after the morning dose of maribavir. Permissible assessment windows for pharmacokinetic profile sampling purposes were +/- 5 days for each sampling day. Samples for determination of VP 44469 (a metabolite of maribavir) concentration were analyzed by a validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method. For plasma, the minimum detectable concentration for VP 44469 was 0.2 μg/mL.

Time frame:
12 hours post-dose after 2, 6, and 10 weeks of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · μg/mL
Plasma Concentration of Maribavir Metabolite VP 44469 During Treatment
μg/mLMaribavir 100 mg BID
2 weeks, n=100.609 ± 0.648
6 weeks, n=70.506 ± 0.224
10 weeks, n=80.666 ± 0.656

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Maribavir 100 mg BID—71/147 (48.3%)127/147 (86.4%)
Ganciclovir 1000 mg TID—76/156 (48.7%)140/156 (89.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 134
Most frequent serious events
EventMaribavir 100 mg BIDGanciclovir 1000 mg TID
Cytomegalovirus InfectionInfections and infestations12/1472/156
Liver Transplant RejectionImmune system disorders4/14712/156
Hepatic Enzyme IncreasedInvestigations8/1474/156
PyrexiaGeneral disorders4/1477/156
Bile Duct StenosisHepatobiliary disorders4/1472/156
Post Procedural Bile LeakHepatobiliary disorders4/1472/156
Renal FailureRenal and urinary disorders4/1473/156
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/1474/156
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders2/1474/156
AscitesHepatobiliary disorders3/1474/156
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 40
Most frequent other events
EventMaribavir 100 mg BIDGanciclovir 1000 mg TID
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders41/14736/156
HeadacheNervous system disorders20/14729/156
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders14/14728/156
TremorNervous system disorders25/14720/156
DysgeusiaGastrointestinal disorders22/14720/156
Urinary Tract InfectionRenal and urinary disorders22/14711/156
HyperkalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders19/14721/156
HypertensionVascular disorders18/14721/156
Oedema PeripheralGeneral disorders19/14715/156
LeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders12/14719/156

Baseline characteristics

The Intent-to-Treat Safety (ITT-S) population, defined as all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study drug, regardless of whether they had any post-baseline evaluations.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Maribavir 100 mg BIDGanciclovir 1000 mg TIDTotal
Mean55 ± 9.053 ± 8.954 ± 9.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Maribavir 100 mg BIDGanciclovir 1000 mg TIDTotal
Female273764
Male120119239
Distribution of age
Distribution of age(Participants)Maribavir 100 mg BIDGanciclovir 1000 mg TIDTotal
18 to 44 years192241
45 to 64 years109123232
65 to 75 years191130
08

Study locations

55 sites
  • Mayo Clinic Arizona
    Phoenix, Arizona 85006, United States
  • University of California at San Diego
    La Jolla, California 92103, United States
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
  • UCLA Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • University of California at San Francisco
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
  • Stanford University Medical Center
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
  • University of Colorado Health Sciences Center
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Georgetown University
    Washington, District of Columbia 20007, United States
  • Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
    Jacksonville, Florida 32224, United States
  • Tampa General
    Tampa, Florida 33606, United States
  • Emory University
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Northwestern University Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • Rush University Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • University of Illinois at Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • University of Chicago Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
  • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
    Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States
  • University of Kansas Medical Center
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
  • University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center
    Lexington, Kentucky 40536, United States
  • Jewish Hospital Louisville
    Louisville, Kentucky 40202, United States
  • Tulane University Hospital and Clinic
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, United States
  • Ochsner Clinic
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70121, United States
  • New England Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02111, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Lahey Clinic
    Burlington, Massachusetts 01805, United States
  • University of Michigan
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • Henry Ford Health System
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • University of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • Washington University School of Medicine
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • University of Nebraska
    Omaha, Nebraska 68198, United States
  • University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
    Newark, New Jersey 07101, United States
  • NYU School of Medicine
    New York, New York 10016, United States
  • Columbia University Medical Center
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • University of Rochester Medical Center- Strong Memorial
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
  • New York Medical College
    Valhalla, New York 10595, United States
  • University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • University of Cincinnati Medical Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45267, United States
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • Integris Baptist Medical Center
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73112, United States
  • Oregon Health and Sciences University
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • University of Pennsylvania Hospital
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15240, United States
  • Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
  • Methodist Transplant Institute
    Memphis, Tennessee 38104, United States
  • Baylor University Medical Center (Dallas)
    Dallas, Texas 75246, United States
  • Baylor College of Medicine (Houston)
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Methodist Hospital
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • UT Memorial Hermann Hospital and Texas Liver Center
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • University of Virginia Health System
    Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, United States
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
    Richmond, Virginia 23298, United States
  • Univeristy of Washington Medical Center
    Seattle, Washington 98195-7110, United States
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00497796
Lead sponsor
Shire
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 9, 2007
Start date
Jul 23, 2007
Primary completion
Sep 14, 2009
Completion
Sep 14, 2009
Results posted
Jun 4, 2015
Last update
Jun 11, 2021

Study contacts

Study Director
study director · Takeda

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion