A Phase 3 interventional study of cytosine arabinoside in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, sponsored by Northern Italy Leukemia Group. Completed at 17 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-03-31.
Sponsored by Northern Italy Leukemia Group · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
The study was set up to assess:
A risk-oriented postremission therapy: HR patients will be electively submitted to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), whenever possible (related/unrelated donor/cord blood; ablative/non-ablative conditioning according to national and local protocols and guidelines). Provided sufficient blood stem cells were previously collected (>2x10e6/kg Cluster of Differentiation 34 cells), SR patients and HR patients excluded from allo-SCT and aged 65 years or less will be randomized to: myeloablative autologous blood stem cell transplantation vs non-myeloablative, multicycle, autologous blood stem cell-supported high-dose cytarabine-based therapy.
Adult AML is a difficult-to-treat illness because of both biological and therapeutic reasons. Most patients are aged >50 years and/or present with comorbid conditions and/or display high-risk AML-related features (poor risk, cytogenetics, prior myelodysplasia, secondary AML). This results in unsatisfactory response to conventional first-line therapy and makes it difficult to apply the most effective post-remission consolidation options (allo-SCT in younger patients with HR features, autologous blood stem cell transplantation and high-dose cytarabine-based therapy in the remainder).
In a prior, phase II uncontrolled NILG trial (registered NCT 00400637),a two-step increasing intensity induction was adopted in order to optimize induction results. 51% of ICE-refractory cases responded to the salvage regimen, irrespective of risk class. In the same study, all HR patients had to be sent to allografting whereas SR patients (by clinico-cytogenetics criteria) were to receive up to three high-dose cytarabine-based cycles, each one supported by a fixed amount of autologous blood-stem cells (1-2x10e6/kg Cluster of Differentiation 34 cells cells), to minimize the risks of high-dose cytarabine-related myelosuppression and to increase treatment intensity by reducing intercycle delays. DFS was 41% at 5 years, 58% in SR patients aged \<55 years, 47% in SR patients aged >55 years, and 47% in HR patients with an identifiable donor. No treatment-related death occurred during the pancytopenic phase in 118 patients receiving 299 blood stem-cell supported high-dose cytarabine cycles.
These facts led to the present trial, in which 1) high-dose induction formerly used as salvage is directly compared to standard ICE chemotherapy and 2) the blood-stem cell supported multicycle high-dose cytarabine program is directly compared to a standard autologous blood stem cell transplantation.
RANDOM 1 CYCLE 1
CYCLE 2 (if CR achieved after cycle 1): Standard IC: idarubicin 10 mg/m2/d on dd 1-3, cytarabine 100 mg/m2/bd on dd 1-7, G-CSF.
CYCLE 3: Intermediate-dose cytarabine 1 g/m2/bd on dd 1-4 followed by G-CSF and by stem cell collection (1-2x10e6/kg CD34+ cells in three separate bags)
ALLO-SCT (Allogeneic Stem Cells Transplantation): All HR patients are eligible to allo-SCT as first therapeutic option. Allo-SCT procedure: any type according to local protocols/guidelines.
RANDOM 2
All SR patients and HR ones excluded from allo-SCT:
Patients excluded from Random 2 as well as from allo-SCT receive attenuated, unsupported consolidation with 1-2 intermediate-dose cytarabine cycles. Patients aged >65 years are excluded from Random 2.
RISK CLASSIFICATION Cytogenetic risk classification is based on MRC/ECOG-SWOG/CALGB criteria (cytogenetic risk classes: favorable, normal/intermediate, unfavorable, other, unknown); clinical risk classification is based on selected diagnostic criteria and response to chemotherapy cycle 1. The final risk model integrates cytogenetic and clinical risk to encompass two broad risk classes (SR and HR).
3,035 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; 746 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 573 is above the median of 40 across 2,561 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute.
Browse Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute studies →Northern Italy Leukemia Group is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion criteria:
Remission induction arm A is with conventional chemotherapy cycle ("ICE": idarubicin, standard-dose cytarabine, etoposide)
Drug: cytosine arabinoside
Remission induction therapy with high-dose cytarabine sequential regimen (HD-Ara-C, idarubicin)
Drug: cytosine arabinoside
Arm A: use of standard-dose cytosine arabinoside (100 mg/m2/bd iv. on days 1-7) in association with idarubicin and etoposide. Arm B: use of high-dose cytosine arabinoside (1000-2000 mg/m2/bd according to age +/-65 years iv. on days 1-2 and 8-9) in association with idarubicin.
Also known as: Aracytin, Cytarabine, Cytosar
Remission induction (R1): Complete remission (CR) rate after cycle 1
Time frame: 30 days after beginning chemotherapy.
Remission consolidation (R2): Length of remission (DFS, disease-free survival)
Time frame: 5 years
R1: CR with incomplete hematological recovery
Time frame: 30 days after beginning chemotherapy
R1:Complete cytogenetic remission
Time frame: 30 days after beginning chemotherapy
R1: Treatment-related death (TRD)
Time frame: 2 months
R2: Overall survival (OS)
Time frame: 5 years
Remission duration and cumulative incidence of relapse
Time frame: 5 years
Treatment-related death
Time frame: 5 years
Quality of Life
Time frame: 1 year and 3 years
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Cytarabine
Northern Italy Leukemia Group