ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00495287Updated Mar 31, 2016

A Remission Induction Therapy and Risk-oriented Postremission Strategy for Adult Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)

A Phase 3 interventional study of cytosine arabinoside in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, sponsored by Northern Italy Leukemia Group. Completed at 17 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-03-31.

Sponsored by Northern Italy Leukemia Group · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
573
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study was set up to assess:

  1. Standard-dose versus high-dose remission induction therapy. A standard ICE chemotherapy vs sequential high-dose cytarabine, with appropriate supportive/prophylactic measures, followed by morphological, cytogenetic and molecular monitoring of remission.
  2. A risk-oriented postremission therapy: HR patients will be electively submitted to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), whenever possible (related/unrelated donor/cord blood; ablative/non-ablative conditioning according to national and local protocols and guidelines). Provided sufficient blood stem cells were previously collected (>2x10e6/kg Cluster of Differentiation 34 cells), SR patients and HR patients excluded from allo-SCT and aged 65 years or less will be randomized to: myeloablative autologous blood stem cell transplantation vs non-myeloablative, multicycle, autologous blood stem cell-supported high-dose cytarabine-based therapy.

    • HR/SR patients unable to be randomized because of inadequate blood stem cell yield will receive intermediate-dose consolidation; patients aged >65 years will be treated with age-adapted therapy.
Read the detailed description

Adult AML is a difficult-to-treat illness because of both biological and therapeutic reasons. Most patients are aged >50 years and/or present with comorbid conditions and/or display high-risk AML-related features (poor risk, cytogenetics, prior myelodysplasia, secondary AML). This results in unsatisfactory response to conventional first-line therapy and makes it difficult to apply the most effective post-remission consolidation options (allo-SCT in younger patients with HR features, autologous blood stem cell transplantation and high-dose cytarabine-based therapy in the remainder).

In a prior, phase II uncontrolled NILG trial (registered NCT 00400637),a two-step increasing intensity induction was adopted in order to optimize induction results. 51% of ICE-refractory cases responded to the salvage regimen, irrespective of risk class. In the same study, all HR patients had to be sent to allografting whereas SR patients (by clinico-cytogenetics criteria) were to receive up to three high-dose cytarabine-based cycles, each one supported by a fixed amount of autologous blood-stem cells (1-2x10e6/kg Cluster of Differentiation 34 cells cells), to minimize the risks of high-dose cytarabine-related myelosuppression and to increase treatment intensity by reducing intercycle delays. DFS was 41% at 5 years, 58% in SR patients aged \<55 years, 47% in SR patients aged >55 years, and 47% in HR patients with an identifiable donor. No treatment-related death occurred during the pancytopenic phase in 118 patients receiving 299 blood stem-cell supported high-dose cytarabine cycles.

These facts led to the present trial, in which 1) high-dose induction formerly used as salvage is directly compared to standard ICE chemotherapy and 2) the blood-stem cell supported multicycle high-dose cytarabine program is directly compared to a standard autologous blood stem cell transplantation.

RANDOM 1 CYCLE 1

  • Standard ICE (all drugs by IV route): idarubicin 12 mg/m2/d on dd 1-3, cytarabine 100 mg/m2/bd on dd 1-7, etoposide 100 mg/m2/d on dd 1-5, G-CSF from d 11.
  • High-dose sequential (all drugs by IV route): cytarabine 2* g/m2/bd on dd 1-2 and 8-9, idarubicin 18 mg/m2/d on dd 3 and 10, G-Colony Stimulating Factory (G-CSF) from d 11. *1 g/m2 in frail patients aged 60-65 and in all those aged >65 years.

CYCLE 2 (if CR achieved after cycle 1): Standard IC: idarubicin 10 mg/m2/d on dd 1-3, cytarabine 100 mg/m2/bd on dd 1-7, G-CSF.

CYCLE 3: Intermediate-dose cytarabine 1 g/m2/bd on dd 1-4 followed by G-CSF and by stem cell collection (1-2x10e6/kg CD34+ cells in three separate bags)

ALLO-SCT (Allogeneic Stem Cells Transplantation): All HR patients are eligible to allo-SCT as first therapeutic option. Allo-SCT procedure: any type according to local protocols/guidelines.

RANDOM 2

All SR patients and HR ones excluded from allo-SCT:

  • Autologous blood stem cell transplantation after BU-CY2 regimen (Busulfan 0.8 mg/kg IV on dd -8 to -5, Cy 60 mg/kg/d on dd -4 to -3, autograft on d 0 (2-6x10e6/kg CD34+ cells) and G-CSF from d +1.
  • Autologous blood stem cell supported multicycle therapy (x3, monthly) with cytarabine 2 g/m2/bd on dd 1-5, idarubicin 8 mg/m2/d on dd 1-2, autograft on d 6 (1-2x10e6/kg CD34+ cells) and G-CSF from d 8.

Patients excluded from Random 2 as well as from allo-SCT receive attenuated, unsupported consolidation with 1-2 intermediate-dose cytarabine cycles. Patients aged >65 years are excluded from Random 2.

RISK CLASSIFICATION Cytogenetic risk classification is based on MRC/ECOG-SWOG/CALGB criteria (cytogenetic risk classes: favorable, normal/intermediate, unfavorable, other, unknown); clinical risk classification is based on selected diagnostic criteria and response to chemotherapy cycle 1. The final risk model integrates cytogenetic and clinical risk to encompass two broad risk classes (SR and HR).

  • Standard risk (SR): favorable cytogenetics, CR achieved after cycle 1; or normal/intermediate cytogenetics, CR achieved after cycle 1, lack of high-risk characteristics.
  • High risk (HR): unfavorable cytogenetics; or normal/intermediate cytogenetics with any high-risk characteristic (WBC >50x10e9/l,FAB M0,6,7 or corresponding WHO, secondary AML, Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)-associated AML, hepatosplenomegaly, FLT3 mutation, CR) not achieved with cycle, persistent cytogenetic abnormality at CR), or other/unknown cytogenetics.
02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

Keywords

  • Acute myelogenous leukemia
  • Adult patients
  • Cytogenetic risk class
  • Clinico-cytogenetic risk model
  • Risk-oriented therapy
03

In context

Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

3,035 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; 746 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 573 is above the median of 40 across 2,561 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute.

Browse Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute studies →

Lead sponsor

Northern Italy Leukemia Group is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 16+ years
  • Diagnosis of untreated (or only hydroxyurea/cyclophosphamide) acute myelogenous leukemia (AML, including myeloid sarcoma) or high-risk myelodysplasia (RAEB-2), either de novo or following an antecedent hematological disorder, or secondary to chemo-radiotherapy for other cancer
  • Signed informed consent
  • Adequate sampling for full cytological, cytochemical, cytogenetic and immunobiological disease characterization by revised FAB, EGIL and WHO criteria
  • ECOG performance status 0-2 or reversible ECOG 3 score following intensive care of complications.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia
  • Pre-existing, uncontrolled pathology such as cardiac disease (congestive/ischemic, acute myocardial infarction within the past 3 months, untreatable arrythmias, NYHA classes III and IV), severe liver disease with serum bilirubin >3 mg/dL and/or ALT >3 x upper normal limit (unless attributable to AML), kidney function impairment with serum creatinine >2 mg/dL (unless attributable to AML), and severe neuropsychiatric disorder that impairs the patient's ability to understand and sign the informed consent, or to cope with the intended treatment plan
  • Known HIV positive serology
  • Other active hematological or non-hematological cancers with life expectancy \<1 year
  • Pregnancy (fertile women will be advised not to become pregnant while on treatment; and male patients to adopt contraceptive methods)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
573 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    A

    Remission induction arm A is with conventional chemotherapy cycle ("ICE": idarubicin, standard-dose cytarabine, etoposide)

    Drug: cytosine arabinoside

  • Experimental
    B

    Remission induction therapy with high-dose cytarabine sequential regimen (HD-Ara-C, idarubicin)

    Drug: cytosine arabinoside

Interventions

  • Arm A: use of standard-dose cytosine arabinoside (100 mg/m2/bd iv. on days 1-7) in association with idarubicin and etoposide. Arm B: use of high-dose cytosine arabinoside (1000-2000 mg/m2/bd according to age +/-65 years iv. on days 1-2 and 8-9) in association with idarubicin.

    Also known as: Aracytin, Cytarabine, Cytosar

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Remission induction (R1): Complete remission (CR) rate after cycle 1

    Time frame: 30 days after beginning chemotherapy.

  2. Remission consolidation (R2): Length of remission (DFS, disease-free survival)

    Time frame: 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. R1: CR with incomplete hematological recovery

    Time frame: 30 days after beginning chemotherapy

  2. R1:Complete cytogenetic remission

    Time frame: 30 days after beginning chemotherapy

  3. R1: Treatment-related death (TRD)

    Time frame: 2 months

  4. R2: Overall survival (OS)

    Time frame: 5 years

  5. Remission duration and cumulative incidence of relapse

    Time frame: 5 years

  6. Treatment-related death

    Time frame: 5 years

  7. Quality of Life

    Time frame: 1 year and 3 years

07

Study locations

17 sites
  • Dipartimento di Ematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale - Azienda Osp. Nazionale Santi Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo
    Alessandria, AL, Italy
  • USC Ematologia Azienda Papa Giovanni XXIII
    Bergamo, BG, Italy
  • Ospedale Spedali Civili di Brescia
    Brescia, Brescia, Italy
  • Ospedale Generale di Bolzano
    Bolzano, Bz, Italy
  • S.C. Ematologia - Azienda Ospedaliera S.Croce e Carle
    Cuneo, CN, Italy
  • Istituti Ospitalieri
    Cremona, Cremona, Italy
  • Ematologia - AOU Careggi
    Florence, FI, Italy
  • Istituto Clinico Humanitas
    Rozzano, Milano, Italy
  • Ematologia Centro TMO - Fondazione IRCSS Ospedale Maggiore
    Milan, MI, Italy
  • Ematologia e TMO - Ospedale San Raffaele
    Milan, MI, Italy
  • Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori
    Milan, MI, Italy
  • Ematologia - TMO - Ospedale San Gerardo
    Monza, MI, Italy
  • A.O.U San Giovanni Battista-Divisione Ematologica dell'Università
    Torino, TO, Italy
  • Ematologia 2 - Osp. Molinette San Giovanni Battista
    Torino, TO, Italy
  • Ospedale Mauriziano
    Torino, TO, Italy
  • Ospedale di Circolo di Varese
    Varese, Varese, Italy
  • Ospedale dell'Angelo
    Mestre, Venezia, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Caprioli C, Lussana F, Salmoiraghi S, Cavagna R, Buklijas K, Elidi L, Zanghi' P, Michelato A, Delaini F, Oldani E, Intermesoli T, Grassi A, Gianfaldoni G, Mannelli F, Ferrero D, Audisio E, Terruzzi E, De Paoli L, Cattaneo C, Borlenghi E, Cavattoni I, Tajana M, Scattolin AM, Mattei D, Corradini P, Campiotti L, Ciceri F, Bernardi M, Todisco E, Cortelezzi A, Falini B, Pavoni C, Bassan R, Spinelli O, Rambaldi A. Clinical significance of chromatin-spliceosome acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Northern Italy Leukemia Group (NILG) randomized trial 02/06. Haematologica. 2021 Oct 1;106(10):2578-2587. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2020.252825. PubMed 32855275 ↗
  • Gianfaldoni G, Mannelli F, Intermesoli T, Bencini S, Giupponi D, Farina G, Cutini I, Bonetti MI, Masciulli A, Audisio E, Ferrero D, Pavoni C, Scattolin AM, Bosi A, Rambaldi A, Bassan R. Early peripheral clearance of leukemia-associated immunophenotypes in AML: centralized analysis of a randomized trial. Blood Adv. 2020 Jan 28;4(2):301-311. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000406. PubMed 31978214 ↗
  • Bassan R, Intermesoli T, Masciulli A, Pavoni C, Boschini C, Gianfaldoni G, Marmont F, Cavattoni I, Mattei D, Terruzzi E, De Paoli L, Cattaneo C, Borlenghi E, Ciceri F, Bernardi M, Scattolin AM, Todisco E, Campiotti L, Corradini P, Cortelezzi A, Ferrero D, Zanghi P, Oldani E, Spinelli O, Audisio E, Cortelazzo S, Bosi A, Falini B, Pogliani EM, Rambaldi A. Randomized trial comparing standard vs sequential high-dose chemotherapy for inducing early CR in adult AML. Blood Adv. 2019 Apr 9;3(7):1103-1117. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018026625. PubMed 30948365 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 31, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00495287
Lead sponsor
Northern Italy Leukemia Group
Responsible party
DR RENATO BASSAN (Medical Doctor, Northern Italy Leukemia Group) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 3, 2007
Start date
Nov 2006
Primary completion
Jul 2015
Completion
Dec 2015
Last update
Mar 31, 2016

Study contacts

Renato Bassan, MD
principal investigator · Norther Italy Leukemia Group

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Cytarabine

Start the discussion