CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00488280Updated Nov 8, 2024

Restoring Walking in Non-ambulatory Children With Severe Chronic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) (Kids STEP Study)

An observational study in Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), sponsored by University of Florida. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 13 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-08.

Sponsored by University of Florida · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
7
Ages
3 Years to 13 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Kids STEP Study aims to

  1. Determine if walking can be restored in children with incomplete SCI and little to no leg movement
  2. Identify the neural pathways that permit recovery of walking
Read the detailed description

Locomotor training (LT) is an activity-based therapy to promote plasticity and recovery of walking. It is based on animal studies investigating walking recovery after spinal cord injury and the nervous system's control of walking. Normal walking is achieved through the interaction of multiple levels of the neural axis (cortex, brain stem, spinal cord). However, a basic rhythmic walking pattern is generated by central pattern generators (CPGs) located within the spinal cord. Investigations of central pattern generators indicate that sensory input specific to the task of walking can enhance the firing of these spinal neuronal centers. Thus, LT is an intensive walking program designed to provide sensory input to the spinal cord so that the neural output from the spinal CPGs can be maximized. In addition, LT uses a treadmill and a harness to provide partial body weight support enabling persons with injury to repetitively practice walking in a safe, enabling environment.

Children enrolled in the study (after medical clearance and consent to participate) will undergo extensive testing and complete 12 weeks of locomotor training. Testing will examine the child's neurologic and functional status. Tests to examine functional status include: ASIA evaluation of sensory and motor function, gait analysis, comprehensive strength tests, and assessment of skills such as cycling, stepping, and kicking. Tests to examine the child's neurologic injury include: MRI, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), and reflex testing. Locomotor training will be conducted daily (5 days/ week) for a total of 60 sessions over 12 weeks. During training children will work closely with therapists, researcher, and trainers to practice walking skills on the treadmill and over-ground.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)

Keywords

  • walking
  • walking recovery
  • physical therapy
  • locomotor training
  • body weight support
  • neuroplasticity
  • step
  • treadmill
  • treadmill training
  • locomotion
03

In context

Spinal Cord Injuries

1,948 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries; 505 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 7 is below the median of 60 across 323 observational studies indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries.

Browse Spinal Cord Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Florida is the lead sponsor of 1,254 studies on the registry; 201 are open to participants now.

Of its 170 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 13 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Children with SCI for whom walking recovery is unlikely

Inclusion criteria

Individuals with SCI will include:

  • Pre-adolescent children, ages 3-13 yrs old
  • A diagnosis of first time, non-progressive SCI, upper motor neuron lesion, including, but not limited to, etiology from trauma, inflammation, vascular, surgical re-section due to localized tumor removal or orthopedic pathology resulting in clinical signs of lower cervical or thoracic spinal cord injury
  • Non-ambulatory or impaired ambulation for greater than 1 yr, such that physical assistance and the use of assistive devices (i.e. walker) and/or leg braces (i.e. knee- ankle- foot orthoses (KAFOs)) are required to ambulate
  • A SCI as defined by the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale category B or C
  • A medically stable condition that is asymptomatic for bladder infection, decubiti, osteoporosis, cardiopulmonary disease, pain, or other significant medical complications that would prohibit or interfere with testing of walking function and training or alter compliance with a training protocol
  • Documented medical approval from the participant's personal physician verifying the participant's medical status
  • Parent's informed consent for children

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Children with SCI who -

  • Are currently participating in a rehabilitation program or another research protocol that could interfere or influence the outcome measures of the current study
  • Have a history of congenital SCI (e.g. Chiari malformation, myelomeningocele, intraspinal neoplasm, Frederich's ataxia) or other degenerative spinal disorders (e.g. spinocerebellar degeneration or syringomyelia) that may complicate the treatment and/or evaluation procedures
  • Children who are diabetic or have implants, pacemakers, or devices which are not NMR/MRI compatible and are not suitable for the study
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
7 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Kids Step Study: Locomotor Training

    All children who participate will be in the experimental cohort, KSS-#, and receive 60 sessions of daily locomotor training. This experimental cohort will also undergo clinical and neurophysiological testing pre, during, and post 60 sessions of locomotor training.

    Behavioral: Locomotor Training

Interventions

  • BehavioralLocomotor Training

    Task-specific practice of walking with assistance from trainers using body weight support and treadmill followed by training over ground, 5x/week, approximately 1.5 hours/day

    Also known as: body weight supported treadmill training, activity-based therapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recovery of walking, assessed in treadmill/ BWS environment and overground

    Time frame: pre-training, after 20, 40, and 60 sessions of locomotor training

Secondary outcomes

  1. Amount of daily step activity

    Time frame: during and post 60 sessions of locomotor training

  2. Walking independence, WISCI II

    Time frame: during and post 60 sessions of locomotor training

  3. Stepping assessment and kinematic analysis

    Time frame: Post 20, 40, and 60 sessions of locomotor training

  4. Analysis of locomotor tasks such as crawling, swimming, cycling

    Time frame: post 20, 40, and 60 sessions of locomotor training

  5. Self-selected and fast gait speed

    Time frame: Pre-training and after 20, 40, 60 sessions (post-LT)

  6. Spinal MRI to assess injury

    Time frame: Pre-training

  7. Spinal reflex assessment (H reflex)

    Time frame: Pre-training and post-training

  8. Correlation of locomotion recovery and isolated voluntary leg movement (ASIA motor score)

    Time frame: Pre-training and post-training

  9. Correlation and assessment of reticulospinal tract (Acoustic startle reflex)with recovery of locomotion

    Time frame: Pre-training and post-training

  10. Correlation and assessment of corticospinal tract integrity via transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Time frame: Pre-training and post-training

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Florida
    Gainesville, Florida 32610, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Barbeau H, Nadeau S, Garneau C. Physical determinants, emerging concepts, and training approaches in gait of individuals with spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2006 Mar-Apr;23(3-4):571-85. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.23.571. PubMed 16629638 ↗
  • Barbeau H, Ladouceur M, Norman KE, Pepin A, Leroux A. Walking after spinal cord injury: evaluation, treatment, and functional recovery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Feb;80(2):225-35. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90126-0. PubMed 10025502 ↗
  • Behrman AL, Lawless-Dixon AR, Davis SB, Bowden MG, Nair P, Phadke C, Hannold EM, Plummer P, Harkema SJ. Locomotor training progression and outcomes after incomplete spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 2005 Dec;85(12):1356-71. PubMed 16305274 ↗
  • Behrman AL, Harkema SJ. Locomotor training after human spinal cord injury: a series of case studies. Phys Ther. 2000 Jul;80(7):688-700. PubMed 10869131 ↗
  • Edgerton VR, Tillakaratne NJ, Bigbee AJ, de Leon RD, Roy RR. Plasticity of the spinal neural circuitry after injury. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:145-67. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144308. PubMed 15217329 ↗
  • Behrman AL, Bowden MG, Nair PM. Neuroplasticity after spinal cord injury and training: an emerging paradigm shift in rehabilitation and walking recovery. Phys Ther. 2006 Oct;86(10):1406-25. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20050212. PubMed 17012645 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 8, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00488280
Lead sponsor
University of Florida
Collaborators
The Craig H. Neilsen Foundation, Brooks Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 20, 2007
Start date
Feb 2007
Primary completion
Sep 2012
Completion
Sep 2012
Last update
Nov 8, 2024

Study contacts

Andrea L Behrman, PhD, PT
principal investigator · University of Florida
Dena R Howland, PhD, OT
principal investigator · University of Florida

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion