CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00472667PRORATAUpdated Nov 25, 2008

PROcalcitonin Reduce Antibiotic Treatments in Acute-Ill Patients (PRORATA)

An interventional study of Procalcitonin guided strategy in Bacterial Infections, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2008-11-25.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
630
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study is a prospective, randomized, controlled intervention trial conducted in 9 centers, comparing a conventional strategy versus a PCT-guided strategy to start or to discontinue antibiotics, in patients with suspected community or hospital- acquired infection.

Read the detailed description

Clinical and laboratory signs are neither specific nor sensitive for diagnosis of sepsis in critically-ill patients. Because delaying antimicrobial therapy may be deleterious, broad-spectrum antibiotics are widely used in ICU -patients, even when they are not needed. In addition, only few well-designed studies concerning the duration of antibiotic treatment have been so far published. Consequently, many patients received antibiotics during the ICU stay. Many studies have shown that exposure to antibiotics, the so called "selection pressure" is an independent risk factor for acquisition of resistance in individual patients. Therefore, reducing antibiotic use is probably necessary to control antibiotic resistance. Many clinical studies have shown that procalcitonin (PCT) is able to distinguish the inflammatory response to infection from other types of inflammation and to distinguish bacterial from viral infections. Recent studies have shown that PCT guidance substantially and safely reduced antibiotic overuse in patients with lower respiratory tract infections. We aimed to evaluate the role of PCT in reducing the use of antibiotics in ICU adult patients. The study is a prospective, randomized, controlled intervention trial conducted in 9 centers, comparing a conventional strategy versus a PCT-guided strategy to start or to discontinue antibiotics, in patients with suspected community or hospital- acquired infection.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bacterial Infections

Keywords

  • Bacterial infections
  • Procalcitonin
  • Intensive care unit
  • Antibiotic therapy
  • Suspicion of bacterial infection or proven
03

In context

Infections

6,687 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 630 is above the median of 120 across 4,200 interventional studies indexed under Infections.

Browse Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,505 studies on the registry; 1,006 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient hospitalised in the ICU
  • Bacterial infection suspected
  • At ICU admission the patient do not receive antibiotics or receive antibiotics for less than 24hours and an interval between admission and inclusion \< 12 hours
  • During ICU stay, provided that the interval between the start of suspected infection and inclusion is \< 12hours
  • Written inform consent from the patient or relatives. The consent may be obtained after the enrollment if the patient is not able to give consent and if there is no relatives

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \< 18 years
  • Pregnancy
  • Patient expected to remain hospitalised in the ICU for less than 3 days
  • Neutropenia
  • Infection or presumed infection requiring prolonged antibiotic therapy (endocarditis,osteo-articular infection, mediastinitis, deep abscess, tuberculosis, pneumocystis pneumonia, toxoplasmosis).
  • Simplified Acute Physiology Score II at ICU admission (calculated during the first 12h)
  • Attending physician declining to use full life support.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
630 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    Procalcitonin guided strategy

    Procedure: Procalcitonin guided strategy

Interventions

  • ProcedureProcalcitonin guided strategy

    Procalcitonin guided strategy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Exposition to antibiotics, defined by antibiotic-free days

    Time frame: assessed 28 days after inclusion

  2. Mortality

    Time frame: at Day 28 and Day 60

Secondary outcomes

  1. Consumption of antibiotics expressed as the Defined Daily Dose/1000 ICU-days

    Time frame: between D1 and D28

  2. The length of ICU and hospital stay

    Time frame: during the stay at the hospital

  3. The evolution of SOFA score parameters

    Time frame: between D1 and D28

  4. The number of mechanical ventilation-free days

    Time frame: at D28

  5. The acquisition cost of antibiotics

    Time frame: between D1 and D28

  6. The percentage of emerging multiresistant bacteria between D1 and D28, as assessed by microbiologic examination of all clinical samples.

    Time frame: between D1 and D28

  7. The percentages of relapses of infection

    Time frame: between D1 and D28

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Chu Bichat Claude Bernard
    Paris, 75018, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bouadma L, Luyt CE, Tubach F, Cracco C, Alvarez A, Schwebel C, Schortgen F, Lasocki S, Veber B, Dehoux M, Bernard M, Pasquet B, Regnier B, Brun-Buisson C, Chastre J, Wolff M; PRORATA trial group. Use of procalcitonin to reduce patients' exposure to antibiotics in intensive care units (PRORATA trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010 Feb 6;375(9713):463-74. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61879-1. Epub 2010 Jan 25. PubMed 20097417 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 25, 2008, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00472667
Lead sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
First posted
May 14, 2007
Start date
Jul 2007
Primary completion
May 2008
Completion
May 2008
Last update
Nov 25, 2008

Study contacts

Lila BOUADMA, MD
principal investigator · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2007. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion