CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00462631PEPCAD IVUpdated Feb 19, 2016

Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon Versus Drug Eluting Stent in Native Coronary Artery Stenoses of Diabetic Patients

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon and paclitaxel eluting stent in Coronary Stenosis and Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by Heart Centre Rotenburg. Completed at 1 site in Malaysia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-02-19.

Sponsored by Heart Centre Rotenburg · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
84
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of Paclitaxel-eluting PTCA-balloon dilation (SeQuentTM Please) followed by cobalt-chromium stent (CoroflexTM Blue) deployment versus Paclitaxel-eluting stent (TaxusTM LibertéTM) deployment in the treatment of de-novo-stenoses in native coronary arteries (reference diameter:more then 2.5 mm and below 3.5 mm, length of stenosis ≥ 10 mm ≤ 20 mm) of patients with diabetes mellitus for ≥ 3 years for procedural success and preservation of vessel patency.

This study is a prospective, randomized, multi-center, two-armed phase-II pilot study conducted in Malaysia and Thailand.

128 diabetes mellitus patients shall complete the study per protocol after random assignment to either of the treatment groups on the order of 20 to 50 patients per center.

Diabetes mellitus patients with stable or selected forms of unstable angina or documented ischemia due to a de-novo stenosis in a native coronary artery will be enrolled. Vessels may not supply an entirely infarcted myocardial area.

Late lumen loss at 9 months is the primary endpoint.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Stenosis
  • Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

  • coronary artery
  • Diabetes
03

In context

Coronary Stenosis

302 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Stenosis; 63 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 84 is below the median of 200 across 160 interventional studies indexed under Coronary Stenosis.

Browse Coronary Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Heart Centre Rotenburg is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • History of diabetes mellitus of at least 3 yrs prior to enrollment. Diabetes mellitus may be treated either orally or s.c.
  • Stable blood glucose level for the 6 months preceding enrollment as reflected by HbA1c concentrations measured exclusively ≤ 8 %
  • Patients with stable angina pectoris (CCS class 1-3) or with unstable angina pectoris (Braunwald class 1-2, A-C) or documented ischemia or with documented silent ischemia
  • Patients eligible for coronary revascularization by means of PCI
  • Women of childbearing potential may not be pregnant nor have the desire to becoming pregnant during the first year following the study procedure. Hence, patients will be advised to use an adequate birth control method up to and including 6 months follow-up
  • Patients who are mentally and linguistically able to understand the aim of the study and to show sufficient compliance in following the study protocol
  • Patients must agree to undergo the 9 months angiographic follow-up
  • Patients must agree to undergo the 3 year clinical follow-up
  • De-novo native coronary artery stenosis (reference diameter: ≥2.5 mm and ≤ 3.5 mm, length of stenosis: ≥ 10 mm and ≤ 20 mm)
  • Target lesion is ≥ 3 mm distant from a major side branch (> 2.0 mm in diameter) and ≥ 3 mm form a previously deployed stent of any type (including active and passive coatings, bare metal stents)
  • The target lesion must be treated with a single stent only (multiple stenting shifts the patient to the intention-to-treat group)
  • Single or multi-vessel coronary artery disease

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with acute (\< 24 h) or recent (48 hours) myocardial infarction
  • Patients with unstable angina pectoris (Braunwald class 3)
  • Patients with severe congestive heart failure
  • Patients with severe heart failure NYHA IV
  • Patients with severe valvular heart disease
  • Women who are pregnant or lactating
  • Patients with another coronary stent implanted previously into the target vessel, drug eluting stents less than 9 months and bare metal stents or stents with passive coatings less than 3 months before the PEPCAD IV DM PCI
  • Patients with bleeding diathesis in whom anticoagulation or anti-platelet medication is contraindicated
  • Patients who had a cerebral stroke \< 6 months prior to the procedure
  • Patient participates in other clinical trials involving any investigational device or drug
  • Untreated hyperthyroidism
  • Patient has presence or history of severe renal failure (GFR\<30ml/min) and is therefore not eligible for angiography. Patient's serum creatinine levels must be documented
  • Post transplantation of any organ or immune suppressive medication
  • Other disease to jeopardize follow-up (e.g., malignancy)
  • Addiction to any drug or to alcohol
  • Patients with any type of surgery during the week preceding the interventional procedure.
  • Therapy with anticoagulants
  • Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus as reflected by an HbA1c ≥ 8% during the six months prior to enrollment in PEPCAD IV DM
  • Patient has a history of peptic ulcer or gastric/intestinal bleeding during the past 6 months.
  • Evidence of extensive thrombosis within target vessel before the intervention
  • Side branch > 2 mm in diameter originating from the lesion
  • Stent within the same vessel less than 3 mm distant from target lesion
  • Multi-lesion percutaneous coronary intervention within one vessel (PCI of a total of two lesions one each in a different vessels is permitted)
  • Target lesion located in any type of coronary bypass (i.e., venous graft, arterial bypass) or graft/native artery connection
  • Coronary artery occlusions of any type (e.g., acute or chronic)
  • In-stent restenosis
  • In-segment restenosis of the native vessel within 4 mm adjacent to the target lesion
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
84 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    paclitaxel eluting balloon followed by bare metal stent

    Device: Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon · Device: bare metal stent

  • Active comparator
    2

    Paclitaxel eluting stent

    Device: paclitaxel eluting stent

Interventions

  • DevicePaclitaxel Eluting Balloon

    Paclitaxel eluting balloon

  • Devicepaclitaxel eluting stent

    paclitaxel eluting stent

  • Devicebare metal stent

    bare metal stent

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Late lumen loss at 9 months

    Time frame: 9 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Procedural success

    Time frame: during procedure

  2. Occurrence of acute (up to 48 hours), subacute (up to 30 days), and late thrombosis

    Time frame: 3 years

  3. 30-day MACE rate

    Time frame: 30 days

  4. Percent in-stent stenosis at 9 months

    Time frame: 9 months

  5. Percent in-segment stenosis at 9 months

    Time frame: 9 months

  6. In-stent late loss index at 9 months

    Time frame: 9 months

  7. Angiographic binary in-stent stenosis rate at 9 months

    Time frame: 9 months

  8. In-segment late loss index at 9 months

    Time frame: 9 months

  9. Angiographic binary in-segment stenosis rate at 9 months

    Time frame: 9 months

  10. Acute and cumulative MACE rate at 9 months

    Time frame: 9 months

  11. Cumulative MACE rate after 2 years

    Time frame: 2 years

  12. Indication for premature follow-up

    Time frame: up to 9 months

  13. Type of recurrence (Mehran-Classification)

    Time frame: 9 months

  14. Target vessel failure

    Time frame: 9 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Cardiology Department, Institut Jantung Negara
    Kuala Lumpur, 50400, Malaysia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ali RM, Degenhardt R, Zambahari R, Tresukosol D, Ahmad WA, Kamar Hb, Kui-Hian S, Ong TK, bin Ismail O, bin Elis S, Udychalerm W, Ackermann H, Boxberger M, Unverdorben M. Paclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty and cobalt-chromium stents versus conventional angioplasty and paclitaxel-eluting stents in the treatment of native coronary artery stenoses in patients with diabetes mellitus. EuroIntervention. 2011 May;7 Suppl K:K83-92. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7SKA15. PubMed 22027736 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 19, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00462631
Lead sponsor
Heart Centre Rotenburg
Collaborators
B. Braun Medical SA
Responsible party
Ralf Degenhardt, PhD (Data Manager, Heart Centre Rotenburg) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 19, 2007
Start date
May 2007
Primary completion
Sep 2011
Completion
Feb 2016
Last update
Feb 19, 2016

Study contacts

Rosli M Ali, MD
principal investigator · Cardiology Department Institut Jantung Negara National Heart Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion