CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00455741Updated May 18, 2018Results posted

Postmenopausal Women Estrogen and Progesterone Infusion

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Estradiol infusion and Progesterone infusion in Postmenopause and Aging, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 45 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-18.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
45 Years to 80 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to study the effects of aging, estrogen and progesterone on the brain. Specifically, we want to look at how the hypothalamus and pituitary (two small glands in the brain) respond to estrogen. The pituitary gland is controlled by the hypothalamus. The hypothalamus secretes GnRH (Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone) that signals the pituitary to secrete the reproductive hormones, LH (Luteinizing Hormone) and FSH (Follicle Stimulating Hormone). These hormones act on the ovaries and signal the ovaries to produce estrogen and progesterone. Estrogen in the bloodstream then acts on the brain to modulate this system with changes in LH and FSH. Early changes associated with low levels of estrogen are inhibitory (estrogen negative feedback) while higher levels of estrogen (such as those present when a follicle in the ovary is ready to ovulate) stimulate LH to cause ovulation (positive feedback). This study will determine: 1) hypothalamic and pituitary levels of glucose uptake (as a measure of brain metabolic activity) at baseline and in association with estrogen negative feedback on LH (24 hr) and estrogen positive feedback on LH (72 hr); and 2) the effect of aging on estrogen feedback on LH, assessing negative feedback (nadir \~ 24 hr) and positive feedback (peak between 72 and 96 hr).

Read the detailed description

The transition to menopause is characterized by a decline in the numbers of functional ovarian follicles followed by a decrease in levels of inhibin A and B and complex changes in estradiol, which include an initial increase followed by an inevitable decrease. Therefore, there are dynamic changes in the hypothalamic-pituitary feedback from the aging ovary, prior to the ultimate loss of feedback that occurs with the complete cessation of ovarian function. While there is ample evidence that the loss of ovarian function is a major contributor to the menopause, there is evidence from animal models that primary age-related neuroendocrine changes may also contribute to reproductive aging. Specifically, there is evidence for changes in the hypothalamic and pituitary responses to estrogen negative and positive feedback. An understanding of the age-related changes in the physiology of the hypothalamic and pituitary responsiveness to gonadal steroid feedback is critical in determining whether hypothalamic and pituitary changes per se contribute to the menopause and the impact of the loss of reproductive function on the brain.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postmenopause
  • Aging

Keywords

  • menopause
  • estrogen
  • progesterone
  • hormone replacement
  • aging
  • PET
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,536 studies on the registry; 446 are open to participants now.

Of its 214 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 161 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

postmenopausal women young (age 45-55) or old (age 70-80) History of natural menopause defined by the absence of menses for at least 12 months (or history of surgical menopause defined as bilateral oophorectomy) Normal TSH, PRL and CBC, and Factor V activity Normal BUN and Creatinine (\< 2 times the upper limit of normal) BMI between 18 to 30 kg/m2 An increased FSH measured at the screening visit will be consistent with menopause. If the initial determination is low, a repeat sample may be drawn.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Hormonal medication or herbal supplements and/or over the counter menopause therapy in the 2 months prior to study Any absolute contraindications to the use of physiologic replacement doses of estrogen and/or progesterone History of coronary artery disease Medications thought to act centrally on the GnRH pulse generator History of breast cancer or blood clots Smoking more than 10 cigarettes/day Prior history of allergic reaction to any dyes used with x-rays or scans and/ or any other contraindications to PET scans No metal implants, pacemakers, aneurysm clips, implanted hearing aids and/or any other contraindications to MRI scan

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Young postmenopausal women

    Graded estradiol infusion to young postmenopausal women. Graded progesterone infusion to young postmenopausal women.

    Drug: Estradiol infusion · Drug: Progesterone infusion

  • Active comparator
    Older postmenopausal women

    Graded estradiol infusion to young postmenopausal women. Graded progesterone infusion to young postmenopausal women..

    Drug: Estradiol infusion · Drug: Progesterone infusion

Interventions

  • DrugEstradiol infusion

    Graded estradiol infusion of 0.1 mcg/kg/hr for 12 hr, 0.135 mcg/kg/hr for 12 hr, 0.165 mcg/kg/hr for 12 hr and 0.2 mcg/kg/hr for 60 hr.

  • DrugProgesterone infusion

    Progesterone infusion of 4.77 nmol/kg/hr (1.5 mcg/kg/hr) for 24 hr and 6.36 nmol/kg/hr (2 mcg/kg/hr) for the final 24 hr of the 5-day study.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Effect of Aging on Estrogen Negative Feedback on LH

    Difference between baseline LH (average of 3 samples drawn 15 min apart) and nadir LH based on a 3-point moving average of blood samples drawn every 4 hours over 120 hr, expressed as a percent of baseline (% baseline).

    Time frame: Baseline at 0 time before infusion, nadir occurred between 8 and 60 hr (mean 24 hr)

  2. Effect of Aging on Estrogen Positive Feedback on LH

    LH area under the curve in response to estrogen positive feedback. Area under the curve was calculated from blood samples drawn every 4 hours from the onset of positive feedback until the end of the study (120 min). The onset of positive feedback is defined as the time when LH first exceeds mean + 2SD of the previous three time points and shows a sustained rise.

    Time frame: Onset of surge (average of 61 hr from beginnning of infusion until the end of the study (120 hr)

Secondary outcomes

  1. 18 FDG Uptake at the Pituitary During Estrogen Infusion: LH Negative Feedback

    Regional cerebral glucose metabolism (rCMRglu) is used as a measure of neuronal metabolic activity and calculated as average uptake (voxels) of 18 flurodeoxyglucose within the region of interest (ROI) and expressed simply as units. Normalized uptake refers to co-registration of the PET with the MRI to provide more accurate anatomic correlates.

    Time frame: Baseline vs 24 hr after the onset of steroid infusion

  2. 18 FDG Uptake at the Hypothalamus During Estrogen Infusion: LH Negative Feedback

    Regional cerebral glucose metabolism (rCMRglu) is used as a measure of neuronal metabolic activity and calculated as average uptake (voxels) of 18 flurodeoxyglucose within the region of interest (ROI) and expressed simply as units. Normalized uptake refers to co-registration of the PET with the MRI to provide more accurate anatomic correlates.

    Time frame: 0 vs 24 hr

  3. 18 FDG Uptake at the Pituitary During Estrogen Infusion: LH Positive Feedback

    Regional cerebral glucose metabolism (rCMRglu) is used as a measure of neuronal metabolic activity and calculated as average uptake (voxels) of 18 flurodeoxyglucose within the region of interest (ROI) and expressed simply as units. Normalized uptake refers to co-registration of the PET with the MRI to provide more accurate anatomic correlates.

    Time frame: 24 hr vs 72 hr

  4. 18 FDG Uptake at the Hypothalamus During Estrogen Infusion: LH Positive Feedback

    Regional cerebral glucose metabolism (rCMRglu) is used as a measure of neuronal metabolic activity and calculated as average uptake (voxels) of 18 flurodeoxyglucose within the region of interest (ROI) and expressed simply as units. Normalized uptake refers to co-registration of the PET with the MRI to provide more accurate anatomic correlates.

    Time frame: 24 vs 72 hr

07

Results

Posted May 18, 2018
Limitations and caveats
PET scan data addresses hypothalamic vs pituitary sites of negative and positive estrogen feedback on LH, but there was insufficient power to address the effect of aging on these secondary measures..

Participant flow

36 subjects consented; 6 failed screening, 2 decided not to participate.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneYounger PMWOlder PMW
Started1312
Completed1311
Not completed01
Withdrew: Physician decision01

Outcome measures

PrimaryEffect of Aging on Estrogen Negative Feedback on LH

Difference between baseline LH (average of 3 samples drawn 15 min apart) and nadir LH based on a 3-point moving average of blood samples drawn every 4 hours over 120 hr, expressed as a percent of baseline (% baseline).

Time frame:
Baseline at 0 time before infusion, nadir occurred between 8 and 60 hr (mean 24 hr)
Reported as:
Mean · % change from baseline
Effect of Aging on Estrogen Negative Feedback on LH
% change from baselineYounger PMWOlder PMW
Effect of Aging on Estrogen Negative Feedback on LH-52.8 ± 3.0-53.2 ± 2.3
Statistical analysis
  • Younger PMW vs Older PMW · ANOVA · p = 0.90
  • Younger PMW vs Older PMW · ANOVA · p = <0.03 (a priori threshold for significance is p\<0.05)
PrimaryEffect of Aging on Estrogen Positive Feedback on LH

LH area under the curve in response to estrogen positive feedback. Area under the curve was calculated from blood samples drawn every 4 hours from the onset of positive feedback until the end of the study (120 min). The onset of positive feedback is defined as the time when LH first exceeds mean + 2SD of the previous three time points and shows a sustained rise.

Time frame:
Onset of surge (average of 61 hr from beginnning of infusion until the end of the study (120 hr)
Reported as:
Mean · IU*hr/L
Effect of Aging on Estrogen Positive Feedback on LH
IU*hr/LYoung Postmenopausal WomenOlder Postmenopausal Women
Effect of Aging on Estrogen Positive Feedback on LH4544.6 ± 636.32885.5 ± 316.7
Statistical analysis
  • Young Postmenopausal Women vs Older Postmenopausal Women · ANOVA · p = =0.03 (a priori significance level p\<0.05)
Secondary18 FDG Uptake at the Pituitary During Estrogen Infusion: LH Negative Feedback

Regional cerebral glucose metabolism (rCMRglu) is used as a measure of neuronal metabolic activity and calculated as average uptake (voxels) of 18 flurodeoxyglucose within the region of interest (ROI) and expressed simply as units. Normalized uptake refers to co-registration of the PET with the MRI to provide more accurate anatomic correlates.

Time frame:
Baseline vs 24 hr after the onset of steroid infusion
Reported as:
Mean · units
18 FDG Uptake at the Pituitary During Estrogen Infusion: LH Negative Feedback
unitsBaseline PituitaryNegative Feedback Pituitary
18 FDG Uptake at the Pituitary During Estrogen Infusion: LH Negative Feedback45.8 ± 4.548.4 ± 4.0
Statistical analysis
  • Baseline Pituitary vs Negative Feedback Pituitary · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.49 (threshold for significance p\<0.05)
Secondary18 FDG Uptake at the Hypothalamus During Estrogen Infusion: LH Negative Feedback

Regional cerebral glucose metabolism (rCMRglu) is used as a measure of neuronal metabolic activity and calculated as average uptake (voxels) of 18 flurodeoxyglucose within the region of interest (ROI) and expressed simply as units. Normalized uptake refers to co-registration of the PET with the MRI to provide more accurate anatomic correlates.

Time frame:
0 vs 24 hr
Reported as:
Mean · units
18 FDG Uptake at the Hypothalamus During Estrogen Infusion: LH Negative Feedback
unitsBaseline HypothalamusNegative Feedback Hypothalamus
18 FDG Uptake at the Hypothalamus During Estrogen Infusion: LH Negative Feedback69.0 ± 3.363.1 ± 2.8
Statistical analysis
  • Baseline Hypothalamus vs Negative Feedback Hypothalamus · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.02 (a priori threshold for significance p\<0.05)
Secondary18 FDG Uptake at the Pituitary During Estrogen Infusion: LH Positive Feedback

Regional cerebral glucose metabolism (rCMRglu) is used as a measure of neuronal metabolic activity and calculated as average uptake (voxels) of 18 flurodeoxyglucose within the region of interest (ROI) and expressed simply as units. Normalized uptake refers to co-registration of the PET with the MRI to provide more accurate anatomic correlates.

Time frame:
24 hr vs 72 hr
Reported as:
Mean · units
18 FDG Uptake at the Pituitary During Estrogen Infusion: LH Positive Feedback
unitsPituitary at 24 hrPituitary at 72 hr
18 FDG Uptake at the Pituitary During Estrogen Infusion: LH Positive Feedback48.0 ± 4.054.3 ± 4.4
Statistical analysis
  • Pituitary at 24 hr vs Pituitary at 72 hr · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.03
Secondary18 FDG Uptake at the Hypothalamus During Estrogen Infusion: LH Positive Feedback

Regional cerebral glucose metabolism (rCMRglu) is used as a measure of neuronal metabolic activity and calculated as average uptake (voxels) of 18 flurodeoxyglucose within the region of interest (ROI) and expressed simply as units. Normalized uptake refers to co-registration of the PET with the MRI to provide more accurate anatomic correlates.

Time frame:
24 vs 72 hr
Reported as:
Mean · unit
18 FDG Uptake at the Hypothalamus During Estrogen Infusion: LH Positive Feedback
unitHypothalamus at 24 hrHypothalamus 72 hr
18 FDG Uptake at the Hypothalamus During Estrogen Infusion: LH Positive Feedback63.1 ± 2.866.2 ± 3.7
Statistical analysis
  • Hypothalamus at 24 hr vs Hypothalamus 72 hr · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.07 (a priori significance set at p\<0.05)

Adverse events

Collected over 60 days for each subject; 4 years in total. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Younger PMW0/13 (0%)0/13 (0%)2/13 (15.4%)
Older PMW0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)1/12 (8.3%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventYounger PMWOlder PMW
vasomotor symptomsVascular disorders2/130/12
anemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/131/12

Baseline characteristics

All subjects were healthy and had experienced their last menstrual period 18 mo previously. Subjects were not on any medications known to interact with the neuroendocrine reproductive axis, including over-the-counter medications or herbal remedies. Factor V Leiden mutations were absent in all patients.

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(years)Younger PMWOlder PMWTotal
Mean49.9 ± 3.875.2 ± 3.661.3 ± 13.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Younger PMWOlder PMWTotal
Female131225
Male000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Younger PMWOlder PMWTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American505
White81220
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Younger PMWOlder PMWTotal
United States131220
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Shaw ND, Srouji SS, Histed SN, Hall JE. Differential effects of aging on estrogen negative and positive feedback. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Aug;301(2):E351-5. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00150.2011. Epub 2011 May 10. PubMed 21558550 ↗
  • Ottowitz WE, Derro D, Dougherty DD, Lindquist MA, Fischman AJ, Hall JE. FDG-PET analysis of amygdalar-cortical network covariance during pre- versus post-menopausal estrogen levels: potential relevance to resting state networks, mood, and cognition. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2008 Aug;29(4):467-74. PubMed 18766152 ↗
  • Ottowitz WE, Dougherty DD, Fischman AJ, Hall JE. [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography demonstration of estrogen negative and positive feedback on luteinizing hormone secretion in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Aug;93(8):3208-14. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-0203. Epub 2008 Jun 3. PubMed 18522979 ↗
  • Ottowitz WE, Siedlecki KL, Lindquist MA, Dougherty DD, Fischman AJ, Hall JE. Evaluation of prefrontal-hippocampal effective connectivity following 24 hours of estrogen infusion: an FDG-PET study. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2008 Nov;33(10):1419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.09.013. Epub 2008 Oct 31. PubMed 18977091 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Requests for sharing coded results without patient identifiers can be made directly to the PI.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 18, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00455741
Lead sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Responsible party
Janet E. Hall, MD (Associate Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 4, 2007
Start date
Nov 2000
Primary completion
Feb 2007
Completion
Aug 22, 2015
Results posted
May 18, 2018
Last update
May 18, 2018

Study contacts

Janet E Hall, M.D.
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion