ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00426751Updated Nov 27, 2012Results posted

Efficacy Of Eptifibatide Compared To Abciximab In Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) For Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Abciximab and Eptifibatide in Infarction, Myocardial, sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. Completed at 24 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-11-27.

Sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
429
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Multinational, multicentre, randomised, prospective, open, parallel group study directly comparing two glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa inhibitors, abciximab and eptifibatide, added early to standard treatment before primary PCI of STEMI patients with respect to effect on sum-ST-resolution after 60 minutes post-procedure and other measures of myocardial reperfusion

02

Conditions studied

  • Infarction, Myocardial

Keywords

  • Eptifibatide
  • ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction
  • STEMI
  • Abciximab
03

In context

Myocardial Infarction

2,779 studies on the registry are indexed under Myocardial Infarction; 417 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 429 is above the median of 148 across 1,613 interventional studies indexed under Myocardial Infarction.

Browse Myocardial Infarction studies →

Lead sponsor

GlaxoSmithKline is the lead sponsor of 3,647 studies on the registry; 118 are open to participants now.

Of its 264 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 239 (91%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women must be postmenopausal (i.e.12 months without menstrual period), or surgically sterile, i.e. women of child bearing potential are not allowed to be included into the study. In cases of doubt a pregnancy test should be performed. (NB -post menopausal women currently receiving hormone replacement are permissible)
  • Acute myocardial infarction \< 12 h defined as:

    1. Angina or equivalent symptoms > 20 min and
    2. ST elevation in 2 contiguous ECG leads (= 2 mm precordial lead, = 1 mm limb lead). This ECG recording serves as baseline ECG, i.e. ECG I.
  • Planned primary percutaneous coronary intervention
  • The subject has given written informed, dated consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects not able to give informed consent
  • Left Bundle Branch Block
  • Thrombolytic therapy within 24 hours before randomization
  • Oral anticoagulation with International Normalized Ratio (INR) > 2
  • Known platelets \< 100.000/µl or known hemorrhagic diathesis
  • Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) within the past 6 months or any permanent residual neurological defect
  • Evidence of an active gastrointestinal or urogenital bleeding
  • Major surgery within 6 weeks
  • History of allergic reaction to abciximab or eptifibatide or any component used in the study (including contrast media)
  • Known severe renal (creatinine clearance \<30ml/min) or hepatic insufficiency as well as Alanine transaminase (ALT)/aspartate transaminase (AST) elevations = 3xUpper limit normal (ULN); isolated AST-elevation is not considered an exclusion criteria from study participation
  • Severe concomitant disease with life expectation \< 1 year
  • Subject has participated in any study using an investigational drug or device within 30 days or within 5 half-lives of the investigational drug (whichever is longer) of entry into this study.
  • Subjects who will be inaccessible due to geographic or social factors during treatment or follow-up
  • In France, a subject is neither affiliated with nor a beneficiary of a social security category.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
429 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Abciximab

    Intravenous bolus of 0.25 mg/kg followed by continuous intravenous infusion of 0.125 mcg/kg/min (max. 10 mcg/min) for 12 h after PCI.

    Drug: Abciximab

  • Experimental
    Eptifibatide

    Intravenous bolus of 180 mcg/kg followed immediately by a continuous infusion of 2.0 mcg/kg/ min for 20-24 h after end of PCI, and a second bolus of 180 mcg/kg administered 10 min after the first bolus.

    Drug: Eptifibatide

Interventions

  • Intravenous bolus of 0.25 mg/kg followed by continuous intravenous infusion of 0.125 mcg/kg/min (max. 10 mcg/min) for 12 h after PCI.

  • Intravenous bolus of 180 mcg/kg followed immediately by a continuous infusion of 2.0 mdg/kg/ min for 20-24 h after end of PCI, and a second bolus of 180 mcg/kg administered 10 min after the first bolus.

    Also known as: Abciximab

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Complete Sum ST Resolution (STR) 60 Minutes (Min) After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) (Per Protocol Population)

    Sum STR was calculated as the difference between baseline (ECG I) and ECG III. The sum STR is the segment elevation resolution from all ECG leads associated with the infarct location. ST resolution, a method used to evaluate myocardial reperfusion, was expressed as a percentage of the baseline value (Complete: ≥ 70% resolution).

    Time frame: Baseline (ECG I) and 60 min +/- 15 min after PCI (ECG III)

  2. Number of Participants With Complete Sum ST Resolution (STR) 60 Min After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) (Intent-to-Treat Population)

    Sum STR was calculated as the difference between baseline (ECG I) and ECG III. The sum STR is the segment elevation resolution from all ECG leads associated with the infarct location. ST resolution, a method used to evaluate myocardial reperfusion, was expressed as a percentage of the baseline value (Complete: ≥ 70% resolution).

    Time frame: Baseline (ECG I) and 60 min +/- 15 min after PCI (ECG III)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Complete or Partial Sum ST Resolution (STR) 60 Min After PCI

    Sum STR was calculated as the difference between baseline (ECGI) and ECG III. The sum STR is the segment elevation resolution from all ECG leads associated with infarct location. ST resolution, a method used to evaluate myocardial reperfusion, was expressed as a percentage of the baseline (Complete: ≥ 70% resolution; Partial: ≥ 30% and \< 70% resolution; None: \< 30% resolution).

    Time frame: Baseline (ECG I) and 60 min +/- 15 min after PCI (ECG III)

  2. Number of Participants With Complete Single Lead ST Resolution (STR) 60 Min After PCI

    Single lead STR is calculated as the difference (as a percentage) between baseline (ECG I) and ECG III of either the ST elevation on one of the leads (II, III, aVF, V5, and V6) or the ST depression of one of the precordial leads (V1- V4), whichever lead showed the largest deviation either at baseline or at ECG III, respectively (Complete: ≥ 70%; Partial: ≥ 30% and \<70%).

    Time frame: Baseline (ECG I) and 60 min +/- 15 min after PCI (ECG III)

  3. Mean Change From Baseline in the Sum ST Resolution 60 Min After PCI

    Sum STR was calculated as the difference between baseline (ECGI) and ECG III. The sum STR is the segment elevation resolution from all ECG leads associated with infarct location. ST resolution, a method used to evaluate myocardial reperfusion, was expressed as a percentage of the baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (ECG I) and 60 min +/- 15 min after PCI (ECG III)

  4. Mean Change From Baseline in Single Lead ST Resolution (STR) 60 Min After PCI

    Single lead STR is calculated as the difference between baseline (ECG I) and ECG III of either the ST elevation on one of the leads (II, III, aVF, V5, and V6) or the ST depression of one of the precordial leads (V1 -V4), whichever lead showed the largest deviation either at baseline or at follow-up, respectively. STR was expressed as a percentage from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (ECG I) and 60 min +/- 15 min after PCI (ECG III)

  5. Mean Change From Baseline in the Sum ST Resolution (STR) Before PCI

    Mean sum STR was calculated as the difference between baseline (ECGI) and ECG II: the mean of the sum of ST elevation resolution from all ECG leads associated with infarct location. ST resolution was expressed as a percentage from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (ECG I) and immediately prior to PCI (ECG II)

  6. Mean Maximum ST Deviation Existing (Max STE) 60 Min After PCI

    Max STE is measured similarly to single-lead STR, but was not compared with the ST deviation on the baseline ECG I. It was the existing ST deviation on the single ECG lead of maximum ST deviation present at 60 minutes after the PCI (ECG III).

    Time frame: 60 min +/- 15 min after PCI (ECG III)

  7. Number of Participants With the Indicated Patency of Infarcted Vessels According to Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Classification Before PCI

    Number of participants with the respective patency of the infarcted vessels was evaluated by TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) flow grades (Grade 0 = No perfusion, Grade 1 = Penetration with minimal perfusion, Grade 2 = Partial perfusion, Grade 3 = Complete perfusion), as assessed by core angiography lab.

    Time frame: immediately before PCI

  8. Number of Participants With TIMI 3 Patency of Infarcted Vessels Following PCI

    The number of participants with TIMI grade 3 (complete perfusion) patency of the infarcted vessels following PCI, as assessed by core angiography lab, was measured.

    Time frame: after PCI

  9. Mean Number of Corrected TIMI Frame Counts (cTIMI) Following PCI

    cTIMI frame counts (number of cineframes needed for dye to reach standardized distal landmarks in a coronary vessel; objective index of coronary blood flow) following PCI, as assessed by core angiography lab.

    Time frame: after PCI

  10. Number of Participants With the Indicated Myocardial Blush Grade (TIMI Myocardial Perfusion Grade [TMPG]) After PCI

    The number of participants with the indicated myocardial blush grade (TMPG), used to assess the myocardial reperfusion in the infarcted myocardium following PCI (as assessed by the core angiography laboratory), was measured. Blush grades: 0 = failure of dye to enter the microvasculature; 1 = dye slowly enters but fails to exit the microvasculature; 2 = delayed entry and exit of dye from the microvasculature; 3: normal entry and exit of dye from the microvasculature. Blush that is of only mild intensity throughout the washout phase but fades minimally is also classified as grade 3.

    Time frame: after PCI

  11. Combined Endpoint: Number of Participants With Events of Death, Re-myocardial Infarction (MI), and Urgent Target Vessel Revascularisation (UTVR)

    The number of participants who died, experienced re-MI, or experienced UTVR (necessity of re-PCI of the target vessel or coronary artery bypass graft \[CABG\] because of recurrent ischaemic angina within 30 days after PCI) within the specified timeframe was measured.

    Time frame: Day 7 or hospital discharge; Day 30 after index-MI

  12. Number of Participants Who Died, and/or Experienced Re-MI and UTVR (Individually Counted)

    The number of participants who died, and/or experienced re-MI or UTVR (individually counted) within the specified timeframe was measured.

    Time frame: Day 7 or hospital discharge; Day 30 after index-MI

  13. Number of Participants Who Experienced Stroke or Major Bleeding Complications

    Number of participants who experienced stroke (hemorrhagic, non-hemorrhagic) or major bleedings (TIMI class: intracranial haemorrhage, spontaneous bleeding, bleeding at any instrumented site, retroperitoneal bleeding, or clinically significant overt haemorrhage associated with a drop in haematocrit of ≥ 15% or a drop in haemoglobin of ≥ 5 g/dL).

    Time frame: Day 7 or hospital discharge; Day 30 after index-MI

  14. Number of Participants Who Died and or Experienced Re-MI Until 6 Months After PCI

    The number of participants who died and/or experienced re-MI within 6 month after PCI was measured.

    Time frame: until 6 Month (Day 180) after index-MI

  15. Number of Participants With Heart Failure Until 6 Months After PCI

    The number of participants with heart failure within 6 month after PCI was measured.

    Time frame: until 6 Months (Day 180) after index-MI

  16. Number of Participants With Major Bleedings (TIMI Classification)

    Number of participants with major bleedings (according to TIMI classification: intracranial haemorrhage, spontaneous bleeding, bleeding at any instrumented site, retroperitoneal bleeding, or clinically significant overt haemorrhage associated with a drop in haematocrit of ≥ 15% or a drop in haemoglobin of ≥ 5 g/dL) within the specified timeframe was measured.

    Time frame: Day 7 or hospital discharge; Day 30 after index-MI

  17. Number of Participants With Minor Bleedings (TIMI Classification)

    The number of participants with minor bleedings (according to TIMI classification: clinically overt bleeding \[e.g., gross haematuria or haematemesis) associated with a drop in haematocrit of ≥ 9% or a drop in haemoglobin of ≥ 3 g/dL) within the specified timeframe was measured.

    Time frame: Day 7 or hospital discharge; Day 30 after index-MI

  18. Mean Duration of Stay in the Ward

    Costs were measured as the duration of stay in the ward (outpatient, normal ward, and intensive care unit) within the specified timeframe was measured.

    Time frame: until 6 months after index-MI

07

Results

Posted Apr 26, 2010

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEptifibatideAbciximab
Started226203
Completed204183
Not completed2220
Withdrew: Adverse event81
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up76
Withdrew: Consent withdrawn01
Withdrew: Other reasons712

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Complete Sum ST Resolution (STR) 60 Minutes (Min) After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) (Per Protocol Population)

Sum STR was calculated as the difference between baseline (ECG I) and ECG III. The sum STR is the segment elevation resolution from all ECG leads associated with the infarct location. ST resolution, a method used to evaluate myocardial reperfusion, was expressed as a percentage of the baseline value (Complete: ≥ 70% resolution).

Time frame:
Baseline (ECG I) and 60 min +/- 15 min after PCI (ECG III)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Complete Sum ST Resolution (STR) 60 Minutes (Min) After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) (Per Protocol Population)
participantsEptifibatideAbciximab
Number of Participants With Complete Sum ST Resolution (STR) 60 Minutes (Min) After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) (Per Protocol Population)7165
Statistical analysis
  • Eptifibatide vs Abciximab · Median difference (final values): 2.1 · 90% CI -8.5 to 12.8
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Complete Sum ST Resolution (STR) 60 Min After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) (Intent-to-Treat Population)

Sum STR was calculated as the difference between baseline (ECG I) and ECG III. The sum STR is the segment elevation resolution from all ECG leads associated with the infarct location. ST resolution, a method used to evaluate myocardial reperfusion, was expressed as a percentage of the baseline value (Complete: ≥ 70% resolution).

Time frame:
Baseline (ECG I) and 60 min +/- 15 min after PCI (ECG III)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Complete Sum ST Resolution (STR) 60 Min After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) (Intent-to-Treat Population)
participantsEptifibatideAbciximab
Number of Participants With Complete Sum ST Resolution (STR) 60 Min After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) (Intent-to-Treat Population)124103
Statistical analysis
  • Eptifibatide vs Abciximab · Mean difference (final values): 6.8 · 95% CI -3.0 to 16.6Analysis based on the ITT population confirmed the results observed in the PP population.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Complete or Partial Sum ST Resolution (STR) 60 Min After PCI

Sum STR was calculated as the difference between baseline (ECGI) and ECG III. The sum STR is the segment elevation resolution from all ECG leads associated with infarct location. ST resolution, a method used to evaluate myocardial reperfusion, was expressed as a percentage of the baseline (Complete: ≥ 70% resolution; Partial: ≥ 30% and \< 70% resolution; None: \< 30% resolution).

Time frame:
Baseline (ECG I) and 60 min +/- 15 min after PCI (ECG III)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Complete or Partial Sum ST Resolution (STR) 60 Min After PCI
participantsEptifibatideAbciximab
Complete sum STR( ≥70%)124103
Complete or partial sum STR (≥30%)180154
Partial sum STR (≥30% and <70%)5651
No sum STR (<30%)3442
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Complete Single Lead ST Resolution (STR) 60 Min After PCI

Single lead STR is calculated as the difference (as a percentage) between baseline (ECG I) and ECG III of either the ST elevation on one of the leads (II, III, aVF, V5, and V6) or the ST depression of one of the precordial leads (V1- V4), whichever lead showed the largest deviation either at baseline or at ECG III, respectively (Complete: ≥ 70%; Partial: ≥ 30% and \<70%).

Time frame:
Baseline (ECG I) and 60 min +/- 15 min after PCI (ECG III)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Complete Single Lead ST Resolution (STR) 60 Min After PCI
participantsEptifibatideAbciximab
Number of Participants With Complete Single Lead ST Resolution (STR) 60 Min After PCI10582
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in the Sum ST Resolution 60 Min After PCI

Sum STR was calculated as the difference between baseline (ECGI) and ECG III. The sum STR is the segment elevation resolution from all ECG leads associated with infarct location. ST resolution, a method used to evaluate myocardial reperfusion, was expressed as a percentage of the baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (ECG I) and 60 min +/- 15 min after PCI (ECG III)
Reported as:
Mean · percent change
Mean Change From Baseline in the Sum ST Resolution 60 Min After PCI
percent changeEptifibatideAbciximab
Mean Change From Baseline in the Sum ST Resolution 60 Min After PCI71.6 ± 27.266.3 ± 31.1
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Single Lead ST Resolution (STR) 60 Min After PCI

Single lead STR is calculated as the difference between baseline (ECG I) and ECG III of either the ST elevation on one of the leads (II, III, aVF, V5, and V6) or the ST depression of one of the precordial leads (V1 -V4), whichever lead showed the largest deviation either at baseline or at follow-up, respectively. STR was expressed as a percentage from baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (ECG I) and 60 min +/- 15 min after PCI (ECG III)
Reported as:
Mean · percent change
Mean Change From Baseline in Single Lead ST Resolution (STR) 60 Min After PCI
percent changeEptifibatideAbciximab
Mean Change From Baseline in Single Lead ST Resolution (STR) 60 Min After PCI70.2 ± 25.564.0 ± 28.7
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in the Sum ST Resolution (STR) Before PCI

Mean sum STR was calculated as the difference between baseline (ECGI) and ECG II: the mean of the sum of ST elevation resolution from all ECG leads associated with infarct location. ST resolution was expressed as a percentage from baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (ECG I) and immediately prior to PCI (ECG II)
Reported as:
Mean · percent change
Mean Change From Baseline in the Sum ST Resolution (STR) Before PCI
percent changeEptifibatideAbciximab
Mean Change From Baseline in the Sum ST Resolution (STR) Before PCI25.9 ± 32.021.2 ± 29.0
SecondaryMean Maximum ST Deviation Existing (Max STE) 60 Min After PCI

Max STE is measured similarly to single-lead STR, but was not compared with the ST deviation on the baseline ECG I. It was the existing ST deviation on the single ECG lead of maximum ST deviation present at 60 minutes after the PCI (ECG III).

Time frame:
60 min +/- 15 min after PCI (ECG III)
Reported as:
Mean · millimeters (mm)
Mean Maximum ST Deviation Existing (Max STE) 60 Min After PCI
millimeters (mm)EptifibatideAbciximab
Mean Maximum ST Deviation Existing (Max STE) 60 Min After PCI1.1 ± 1.11.4 ± 1.4
SecondaryNumber of Participants With the Indicated Patency of Infarcted Vessels According to Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Classification Before PCI

Number of participants with the respective patency of the infarcted vessels was evaluated by TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) flow grades (Grade 0 = No perfusion, Grade 1 = Penetration with minimal perfusion, Grade 2 = Partial perfusion, Grade 3 = Complete perfusion), as assessed by core angiography lab.

Time frame:
immediately before PCI
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Patency of Infarcted Vessels According to Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Classification Before PCI
participantsEptifibatideAbciximab
TIMI 3 patency before PCI7459
TIMI 2/3 patency before PCI8567
TIMI 0/1 patency before PCI117123
SecondaryNumber of Participants With TIMI 3 Patency of Infarcted Vessels Following PCI

The number of participants with TIMI grade 3 (complete perfusion) patency of the infarcted vessels following PCI, as assessed by core angiography lab, was measured.

Time frame:
after PCI
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With TIMI 3 Patency of Infarcted Vessels Following PCI
participantsEptifibatideAbciximab
Number of Participants With TIMI 3 Patency of Infarcted Vessels Following PCI145137
SecondaryMean Number of Corrected TIMI Frame Counts (cTIMI) Following PCI

cTIMI frame counts (number of cineframes needed for dye to reach standardized distal landmarks in a coronary vessel; objective index of coronary blood flow) following PCI, as assessed by core angiography lab.

Time frame:
after PCI
Reported as:
Mean · number of frame counts
Mean Number of Corrected TIMI Frame Counts (cTIMI) Following PCI
number of frame countsEptifibatideAbciximab
Mean Number of Corrected TIMI Frame Counts (cTIMI) Following PCI25.3 ± 21.023.6 ± 17.9
SecondaryNumber of Participants With the Indicated Myocardial Blush Grade (TIMI Myocardial Perfusion Grade [TMPG]) After PCI

The number of participants with the indicated myocardial blush grade (TMPG), used to assess the myocardial reperfusion in the infarcted myocardium following PCI (as assessed by the core angiography laboratory), was measured. Blush grades: 0 = failure of dye to enter the microvasculature; 1 = dye slowly enters but fails to exit the microvasculature; 2 = delayed entry and exit of dye from the microvasculature; 3: normal entry and exit of dye from the microvasculature. Blush that is of only mild intensity throughout the washout phase but fades minimally is also classified as grade 3.

Time frame:
after PCI
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Myocardial Blush Grade (TIMI Myocardial Perfusion Grade [TMPG]) After PCI
participantsEptifibatideAbciximab
Myocardial blush Grade 36454
Myocardial blush Grade 200
Myocardial blush Grade 19896
Myocardial blush Grade 01311
Not assessable3834
SecondaryCombined Endpoint: Number of Participants With Events of Death, Re-myocardial Infarction (MI), and Urgent Target Vessel Revascularisation (UTVR)

The number of participants who died, experienced re-MI, or experienced UTVR (necessity of re-PCI of the target vessel or coronary artery bypass graft \[CABG\] because of recurrent ischaemic angina within 30 days after PCI) within the specified timeframe was measured.

Time frame:
Day 7 or hospital discharge; Day 30 after index-MI
Reported as:
Number · participants
Combined Endpoint: Number of Participants With Events of Death, Re-myocardial Infarction (MI), and Urgent Target Vessel Revascularisation (UTVR)
participantsEptifibatideAbciximab
Death, re-MI, or UTVR until day 7 or discharge1214
Death, re-MI, or UTVR until day 301717
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Died, and/or Experienced Re-MI and UTVR (Individually Counted)

The number of participants who died, and/or experienced re-MI or UTVR (individually counted) within the specified timeframe was measured.

Time frame:
Day 7 or hospital discharge; Day 30 after index-MI
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Who Died, and/or Experienced Re-MI and UTVR (Individually Counted)
participantsEptifibatideAbciximab
Deaths until day 7 or discharge87
Deaths until day 30137
Re-MI until day 7 or discharge03
Re-MI until day 3005
UTVR until day 7 or discharge58
UTVR until day 30510
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Experienced Stroke or Major Bleeding Complications

Number of participants who experienced stroke (hemorrhagic, non-hemorrhagic) or major bleedings (TIMI class: intracranial haemorrhage, spontaneous bleeding, bleeding at any instrumented site, retroperitoneal bleeding, or clinically significant overt haemorrhage associated with a drop in haematocrit of ≥ 15% or a drop in haemoglobin of ≥ 5 g/dL).

Time frame:
Day 7 or hospital discharge; Day 30 after index-MI
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Who Experienced Stroke or Major Bleeding Complications
participantsEptifibatideAbciximab
Stroke or major bleeding until day 7 or discharge61
Stroke or major bleeding until day 3062
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Died and or Experienced Re-MI Until 6 Months After PCI

The number of participants who died and/or experienced re-MI within 6 month after PCI was measured.

Time frame:
until 6 Month (Day 180) after index-MI
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Who Died and or Experienced Re-MI Until 6 Months After PCI
participantsEptifibatideAbciximab
Number of Participants Who Died and or Experienced Re-MI Until 6 Months After PCI1515
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Heart Failure Until 6 Months After PCI

The number of participants with heart failure within 6 month after PCI was measured.

Time frame:
until 6 Months (Day 180) after index-MI
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Heart Failure Until 6 Months After PCI
participantsEptifibatideAbciximab
Number of Participants With Heart Failure Until 6 Months After PCI2322
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Major Bleedings (TIMI Classification)

Number of participants with major bleedings (according to TIMI classification: intracranial haemorrhage, spontaneous bleeding, bleeding at any instrumented site, retroperitoneal bleeding, or clinically significant overt haemorrhage associated with a drop in haematocrit of ≥ 15% or a drop in haemoglobin of ≥ 5 g/dL) within the specified timeframe was measured.

Time frame:
Day 7 or hospital discharge; Day 30 after index-MI
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Major Bleedings (TIMI Classification)
participantsEptifibatideAbciximab
Major bleedings (TIMI classification) until day 760
Major bleedings (TIMI classification) until day 3061
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Minor Bleedings (TIMI Classification)

The number of participants with minor bleedings (according to TIMI classification: clinically overt bleeding \[e.g., gross haematuria or haematemesis) associated with a drop in haematocrit of ≥ 9% or a drop in haemoglobin of ≥ 3 g/dL) within the specified timeframe was measured.

Time frame:
Day 7 or hospital discharge; Day 30 after index-MI
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Minor Bleedings (TIMI Classification)
participantsEptifibatideAbciximab
Minor bleedings (TIMI classification) until day 71912
Minor bleedings (TIMI classification) until day 301912
SecondaryMean Duration of Stay in the Ward

Costs were measured as the duration of stay in the ward (outpatient, normal ward, and intensive care unit) within the specified timeframe was measured.

Time frame:
until 6 months after index-MI
Reported as:
Mean · days
Mean Duration of Stay in the Ward
daysEptifibatideAbciximab
Mean Duration of Stay in the Ward8.0 ± 6.79.7 ± 11.9

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Eptifibatide—24/226 (10.6%)49/226 (21.7%)
Abciximab—19/201 (9.5%)28/201 (13.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 42
Most frequent serious events
EventEptifibatideAbciximab
Cardiogenic shockCardiac disorders4/2262/201
Angina pectorisCardiac disorders2/2262/201
Pericardial effusionCardiac disorders0/2262/201
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders2/2260/201
Ventricular tachycardiaCardiac disorders2/2260/201
HaemorrhageVascular disorders2/2260/201
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders0/2261/201
Atrioventricular block completeCardiac disorders0/2261/201
Ventricular septal defectCongenital, familial and genetic disorders0/2261/201
MalaiseGeneral disorders0/2261/201
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventEptifibatideAbciximab
Post procedural heamatomaInjury, poisoning and procedural complications12/2269/201
Angina pectorisCardiac disorders11/2265/201
Ventricular tachycardiaCardiac disorders9/2266/201
Ventricular extrasystolesCardiac disorders7/2264/201
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders5/2260/201
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders5/2260/201
HeadacheNervous system disorders0/2264/201

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)EptifibatideAbciximabTotal
Mean61.3 ± 12.560.5 ± 12.760.9 ± 12.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)EptifibatideAbciximabTotal
Female503989
Male164157321
08

Study locations

24 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Alençon, 61014, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Bordeaux, 33076, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Caen, 14033, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Créteil, 94010, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Lille, 59037, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Melun, 77000, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Melun, 77007, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Nancy, 54000, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Ollioules, 83190, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Pau, 64046, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Perpignan, 66000, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Pessac, 33604, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Toulon, 83056, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg 79106, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg 69120, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Würzburg, Bavaria 97080, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Offenbach, Hesse 63069, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia 52074, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Dortmund, North Rhine-Westphalia 44137, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Mönchengladbach, North Rhine-Westphalia 41063, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Neuss, North Rhine-Westphalia 41464, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Rhineland-Palatinate 67063, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Homburg, Saarland 66421, Germany
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Zeymer U, Margenet A, Haude M, Bode C, Lablanche JM, Heuer H, Schroder R, Kropff S, Bourkaib R, Banik N, Zahn R, Teiger E. Randomized comparison of eptifibatide versus abciximab in primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the EVA-AMI Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Aug 3;56(6):463-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.08.093. PubMed 20670755 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 27, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00426751
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 25, 2007
Start date
Oct 2006
Primary completion
Dec 2007
Completion
Dec 2007
Results posted
Apr 26, 2010
Last update
Nov 27, 2012

Study contacts

GSK Clinical Trials
study director · GlaxoSmithKline
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Eptifibatide

Start the discussion