CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00413920Updated Apr 21, 2011Results posted

Efficacy and Safety of Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium and Cyclosporine in Combination With and Without Steroids, in Adult Renal Transplant Recipients

A Phase 3 interventional study of Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) and Prednisone in Renal Transplantation, sponsored by Novartis. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-04-21.

Sponsored by Novartis · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
222
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will investigate the efficacy and safety of a steroid avoidance regimen in comparison with steroid treatment in combination with an initially higher dose of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) and cyclosporine microemulsion in de novo renal transplant recipients. Patients will be randomly allocated to receive either EC-MPS or steroids in combination with EC-MPS. Patients of both treatment groups will receive monoclonal antibody induction therapy and a perioperative bolus of steroids and cyclosporine.

02

Conditions studied

  • Renal Transplantation

Keywords

  • Steroids avoidance,
  • enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS),
  • de novo renal transplantation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Novartis is the lead sponsor of 703 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Primary donor kidney transplant
  • Panel reactive antibody (PRA) ≤ 20%

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Multi-organ transplantation including dual kidneys or previous transplant with any other organ different from kidney
  • Non-heart beating donor or kidney from a non-compatible donor

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
222 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Without Steroids

    Patients received Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS), administered orally 2 times a day for 6 months. Patients also received cyclosporine and a dose of methylprednisolone immediately after transplantation, but did not subsequently receive oral corticosteroids for the remainder of the study.

    Drug: Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS)

  • Active comparator
    With Steroids

    Patients received Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS), administered orally 2 times a day for 6 months. Patients also received cyclosporine and a dose of methylprednisolone immediately after transplantation, and subsequently continued to receive daily oral prednisone.

    Drug: Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) · Drug: Prednisone

Interventions

  • DrugEnteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS)

    An initial dose of 1080 mg EC-MPS was administered immediately before transplantation. Then, during the first 6 weeks post-transplantation, EC-MPS was administered at a dose of 1080 mg twice a day 12 hours apart. From week 7 until the end of the study (month 6), EC-MPS was administered at standard dose of 720 mg twice a day.

    Also known as: Myfortic

  • DrugPrednisone

    Oral tablets

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With the Occurrence of Treatment Failures at 6 Months Post-transplantation

    Treatment failures defined as Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or loss to follow-up. Only BPAR from other biopsies than the protocol defined biopsy at Month 3 are described. Acute rejection: an episode of acute renal dysfunction diagnosed as rejection on the basis of biopsy or clinical observations, treated with anti-rejection medication. BPAR: renal transplant biopsy finding of acute cellular or antibody mediated rejection. Graft loss: allograft will be presumed to be lost on the day the patient starts dialysis and is not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis.

    Time frame: 6 months post transplantation

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Number of Participants With BPAR, Clinical Acute Rejection (AR) and Treated AR at 6 Months

    If a participant experienced several BPAR, only the rejection with highest grade is taken into account. Only events that occurred before study treatment discontinuation are taken into account. Only BPAR from other biopsies than the protocol defined biopsy at Month 3 are described. Acute rejection: an episode of acute renal dysfunction diagnosed as rejection on the basis of biopsy or clinical observations, treated with anti-rejection medication. BPAR: renal transplant biopsy finding of acute cellular or antibody mediated rejection.

    Time frame: Month 6

  2. Number of Participants With Treatment Failure, BPAR, Clinical Acute Rejection (AR) and Treated AR at 3 Months

    A treatment failure is a Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), a graft loss, a death, or a loss to follow-up. Only BPAR from other biopsies than the protocol defined biopsy at Month 3 are described. Acute rejection: an episode of acute renal dysfunction diagnosed as rejection on the basis of biopsy or clinical observations, treated with anti-rejection medication. BPAR: renal transplant biopsy finding of acute cellular or antibody mediated rejection. Graft loss: The allograft will be presumed lost on the day the patient starts dialysis and is not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis.

    Time frame: Month 3

  3. Number of Participants With Subclinical Histological Rejections

    The number of participants with subclinical histological rejections was determined by renal biopsy screening at 3 months in 125 patients, providing adequate samples for 112 biopsies.

    Time frame: Month 3

  4. Number of Participants With Treatment Failure at 3 Months by Graft Recovery Status

    The number of participants with treatment failure defined as a Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), a graft loss, a death, or a loss to follow-up at 3 months by graft recovery status. Delayed graft function is defined as the need for dialysis within the first 7 days post-transplantation, excluding the first post-transplantation day. Slow graft function is defined as a serum creatinine value \> 250 µmol/L at day 5.

    Time frame: Month 3

  5. Number of Participants Requiring Steroids in Non-steroid Treatment Group

    Time frame: Months 3 and 6

07

Results

Posted Feb 7, 2011

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneWithout SteroidsWith Steroids
Started112110
Completed8482
Not completed2828
Withdrew: Adverse event911
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy119
Withdrew: Death35
Withdrew: Graft loss53

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With the Occurrence of Treatment Failures at 6 Months Post-transplantation

Treatment failures defined as Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or loss to follow-up. Only BPAR from other biopsies than the protocol defined biopsy at Month 3 are described. Acute rejection: an episode of acute renal dysfunction diagnosed as rejection on the basis of biopsy or clinical observations, treated with anti-rejection medication. BPAR: renal transplant biopsy finding of acute cellular or antibody mediated rejection. Graft loss: allograft will be presumed to be lost on the day the patient starts dialysis and is not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis.

Time frame:
6 months post transplantation
Reported as:
Number · Number of participants
Number of Participants With the Occurrence of Treatment Failures at 6 Months Post-transplantation
Number of participantsWithout SteroidsWith Steroids
Number of Participants With the Occurrence of Treatment Failures at 6 Months Post-transplantation2016
SecondaryThe Number of Participants With BPAR, Clinical Acute Rejection (AR) and Treated AR at 6 Months

If a participant experienced several BPAR, only the rejection with highest grade is taken into account. Only events that occurred before study treatment discontinuation are taken into account. Only BPAR from other biopsies than the protocol defined biopsy at Month 3 are described. Acute rejection: an episode of acute renal dysfunction diagnosed as rejection on the basis of biopsy or clinical observations, treated with anti-rejection medication. BPAR: renal transplant biopsy finding of acute cellular or antibody mediated rejection.

Time frame:
Month 6
Reported as:
Number · Number of participants
The Number of Participants With BPAR, Clinical Acute Rejection (AR) and Treated AR at 6 Months
Number of participantsWithout SteroidsWith Steroids
Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection138
Graft Loss53
Death25
Loss to Follow-up00
Acute Rejection3721
Treated Acute Rejection3619
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Failure, BPAR, Clinical Acute Rejection (AR) and Treated AR at 3 Months

A treatment failure is a Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), a graft loss, a death, or a loss to follow-up. Only BPAR from other biopsies than the protocol defined biopsy at Month 3 are described. Acute rejection: an episode of acute renal dysfunction diagnosed as rejection on the basis of biopsy or clinical observations, treated with anti-rejection medication. BPAR: renal transplant biopsy finding of acute cellular or antibody mediated rejection. Graft loss: The allograft will be presumed lost on the day the patient starts dialysis and is not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis.

Time frame:
Month 3
Reported as:
Number · Number of participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Failure, BPAR, Clinical Acute Rejection (AR) and Treated AR at 3 Months
Number of participantsWithout SteroidsWith Steroids
Treatment Failure178
Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection105
Graft Loss51
Death22
Loss to Follow-up00
Acute Rejection3219
Treated Acute Rejection3116
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Subclinical Histological Rejections

The number of participants with subclinical histological rejections was determined by renal biopsy screening at 3 months in 125 patients, providing adequate samples for 112 biopsies.

Time frame:
Month 3
Reported as:
Number · Number of participants
Number of Participants With Subclinical Histological Rejections
Number of participantsWithout SteroidsWith Steroids
Sample quality inadequate76
Subclinical rejection1217
Borderline lesions25
BPAR1012
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Failure at 3 Months by Graft Recovery Status

The number of participants with treatment failure defined as a Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), a graft loss, a death, or a loss to follow-up at 3 months by graft recovery status. Delayed graft function is defined as the need for dialysis within the first 7 days post-transplantation, excluding the first post-transplantation day. Slow graft function is defined as a serum creatinine value \> 250 µmol/L at day 5.

Time frame:
Month 3
Reported as:
Number · Number of participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Failure at 3 Months by Graft Recovery Status
Number of participantsWithout SteroidsWith Steroids
Delayed Graft Function [N= 25,24]84
Slow Graft Function [N= 36,23]61
Immediate Graft Function [N= 51,63]33
SecondaryNumber of Participants Requiring Steroids in Non-steroid Treatment Group
Time frame:
Months 3 and 6
Reported as:
Number · Number of participants
Number of Participants Requiring Steroids in Non-steroid Treatment Group
Number of participantsWithout Steroids
3 Months25
6 Months20

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Without Steroids—72/112 (64.3%)104/112 (92.9%)
With Steroids—69/110 (62.7%)107/110 (97.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 204
Most frequent serious events
EventWithout SteroidsWith Steroids
Renal failure acuteRenal and urinary disorders12/11210/110
PyrexiaGeneral disorders10/11210/110
Cytomegalovirus infectionInfections and infestations6/11210/110
Blood creatinine increasedInvestigations10/1128/110
PyelonephritisInfections and infestations5/1129/110
Graft dysfunctionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications8/1128/110
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders5/1126/110
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders2/1125/110
LymphoceleVascular disorders3/1125/110
ChillsGeneral disorders5/1123/110
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 31
Most frequent other events
EventWithout SteroidsWith Steroids
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders60/11256/110
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations34/11239/110
HyperglycaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders30/11231/110
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders27/11227/110
DyslipidaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders10/11221/110
LeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders21/11212/110
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders20/11218/110
HypertensionVascular disorders20/11217/110
HyperkalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders19/1129/110
Graft dysfunctionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications16/11218/110

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Without SteroidsWith SteroidsTotal
Mean51.0 ± 10.2450.9 ± 11.9151.0 ± 11.07
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Without SteroidsWith SteroidsTotal
< 45 years332558
45-60 years5658114
>= 60 years232750
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Without SteroidsWith SteroidsTotal
Female364076
Male7670146
08

Study locations

1 site
  • C.H.U. La Milétrie
    Poitiers, France
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 21, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00413920
Lead sponsor
Novartis
First posted
Dec 20, 2006
Start date
Apr 2007
Primary completion
Mar 2009
Results posted
Feb 7, 2011
Last update
Apr 21, 2011

Study contacts

Novartis
study director · Novartis
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion