A Phase 3 interventional study of Influenza Vaccination in Influenza, sponsored by Protein Sciences Corporation. Completed at 7 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2009-12-17.
Sponsored by Protein Sciences Corporation · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention
The purpose of this study were to obtain additional evidence in support of the safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant hemagglutinin (rHA) vaccine in an elderly population, and to establish non-inferiority of the immunogenicity of the rHA vaccine when compared with a licensed trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV). Another purpose was to provide a preliminary estimate of the relative efficacy of the two vaccines against culture-positive influenza-like illness during the subsequent epidemic.
Annual influenza epidemics are associated with serious excess morbidity and mortality, particularly among the elderly. Licensed trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines (TIVs) have been shown to reduce hospitalization and death following influenza in this vulnerable population, but their efficacy is lower than that observed in younger, healthy populations. In addition, recent studies have questioned the level of effectiveness of TIV in the elderly, suggesting that cohort studies have overestimated the benefits of immunization with current TIV formulations in this age group. In view of these considerations, it is widely accepted that improved and alternative vaccines are needed for control of seasonal and pandemic influenza.
Currently available TIVs are prepared from viruses that are grown in embryonated hens' eggs. Alternative substrates for vaccine production are desirable in order to reduce the vulnerability of and to expand influenza vaccine supply. Recombinant DNA techniques allow for expression of the influenza hemagglutinin (rHA) by baculovirus vectors in insect cell cultures. Advantages of this technique include speed of production, absence of egg protein, and a highly purified product. Previous studies among healthy younger and older adults have confirmed that rHA vaccines are safe, well tolerated and immunogenic at dosages up to nine times higher than those contained in TIV. Dose-related increases in serum antibody levels after immunization also were observed.
2,214 studies on the registry are indexed under Influenza, Human; 163 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 870 is above the median of 238 across 1,853 interventional studies indexed under Influenza, Human.
Browse Influenza, Human studies →Protein Sciences Corporation is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Recombinant Trivalent Hemagglutinin Influenza Vaccine: 2005-2006 formulation containing 45μg of each hemagglutinin derived from A/New Caledonia (H1N1), A/Wisconsin (H3N2) and B/Ohio 135μg total
Biological: Influenza Vaccination
Licensed trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV): 2005-2006 formulation containing 15μg of each hemagglutinin derived from A/Wisconsin (H3N2), A/New Caledonia (H1N1) and B/Malaysia 45μg total (Fluzone, sanofi pasteur)
Biological: Influenza Vaccination
0.5mL dose for intramuscular injection
Also known as: FluBlok, Fluzone, rHA, rHA0, recombinant hemagglutinin, TIV
Evaluation of safety and reactogenicity of FluBlok and TIV in medically stable adults 65 years and older.
Time frame: influenza season
Comparison of relative efficacy and effectiveness of FluBlok and TIV in medically stable adults 65 years and older.
Time frame: influenza season
Evaluation and comparison of immunogenicity of FluBlok and TIV in medically stable adults 65 years and older.
Time frame: influenza season
This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Protein Sciences Corporation