ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00380861Updated Jul 24, 2023Results posted

Does Implant Design Improve Postoperative Flexion?

An interventional study of Total knee replacement using the PFC Sigma RPF knee implant. and Total knee replacement using the PFC Sigma RP knee implant in Non-inflammatory Arthritis, sponsored by DePuy Orthopaedics. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-24.

Sponsored by DePuy Orthopaedics (part of Johnson & Johnson) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2006, registered Sep 2006).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
93
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will evaluate whether design features of one implant design allows more knee bend than the other. Patients will have 1 design in the left knee and 1 design in their right knee. Both knee surgeries will be on the same day.

Read the detailed description

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether the passive, non-weight-bearing flexion is superior with the posterior-stabilized PFC® Sigma™ RP-F compared to the posterior-stabilized PFC® Sigma™ RP in bilateral Subjects receiving both implants and if this difference is a function of implant design.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-inflammatory Arthritis

Keywords

  • Total Knee Replacement
  • Flexion
  • Range of Motion
  • Activities of Daily Living
  • Implant design
  • Subject Satisfaction
  • Non-inflammatory arthritis
03

In context

Lead sponsor

DePuy Orthopaedics is the lead sponsor of 45 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (100%) have results posted.

First submitted after DePuy Orthopaedics became part of Johnson & Johnson.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Non-Inflammatory Arthritis
  • Age = 40-70 years
  • Male or female
  • Suitable for devices in study
  • Needing primary simultaneous bilateral knee replacements
  • Willing to consent and authorize release of personal health information
  • Subjects who are able to understand this clinical investigation, co-operate with investigational procedures and are willing to return to the clinic, hospital and predefined physical therapy centers for all the required postoperative follow-ups,

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Existing conditions that would compromise participation
  • Multiple joint involvement
  • Pregnant/lactating women
  • Inflammatory arthritis
  • Fixed flexion contracture greater than 20 degrees
  • Previous knee replacement of any type
  • Needing device(s) not specified in protocol
  • The Subject is a known drug or alcohol abuser or has a psychological disorder that would compromise follow-up
  • Those who have participated in an investigation in the last 3 months
  • Those involved in personal injury litigation, medical-legal or workers compensation claims
  • Failure to follow surgical technique details specified in the protocol
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
93 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    PFC Sigma RP-F

    PFC® Sigma™ RP-F knee implant is a posterior stabilized cemented component cemented that is implanted with a standard posterior stabilized surgical technique.

    Device: Total knee replacement using the PFC Sigma RPF knee implant.

  • Active comparator
    PFC Sigma RP

    P.F.C.® Sigma™ Rotating Platform (RP) Cruciate Retaining Knee System has a special insert that helps the knee move more like it did before the knee replacement.

    Device: Total knee replacement using the PFC Sigma RP knee implant

Interventions

  • DeviceTotal knee replacement using the PFC Sigma RPF knee implant.

    Total knee replacement

  • DeviceTotal knee replacement using the PFC Sigma RP knee implant

    Total knee replacement

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Knee Society Passive Flexion at 6 Months

    The patient lies supine (on their back) on the table and a medically trained professional moves the limb to bend the knee to a maximum flexion position. The angle of flexion is measured with a goniometer, which is an angle-measuring device.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Subgroup Analysis - Passive Flexion Analyzed and Reported for Pre-op, 6- and 12-months, for Subjects With Less Than 120 Degrees Passive Flexion Pre-op in Either Knee

    The patient lies supine (on their back) on the table and a medically trained professional moves the limb to bend the knee to a maximum flexion position. The angle of flexion is measured with a goniometer, which is an angle-measuring device.

    Time frame: Collected at Pre-operative, 2 and 6 weeks and 6- and 12-months, analyzed and reported for pre-op, 6- and 12-months

  2. Patient Specific Anthropometrics

    Various Patient specific anthropometrics were examined to assess their potential influence and interaction on post-op outcomes.

    Time frame: Collected at pre-op

  3. American Knee Society (AKS) Score

    AKS Score post-op at 12-months is reported for the final visit AKS score is a 0 -100-point scale with 100 being best knee condition.

    Time frame: Collected Pre-operative, 2 and 6 weeks and 6 and 12 months follow up. Reporting for final 12-month interval

  4. KOOS Pain Sub-score

    KOOS is a self-reported outcome measure assessing the patient's opinion about health, symptoms, and functionality of their knee. There are 5 sub-scales: symptoms, pain activity of daily living, sports/recreation and quality of life. Further, the sub-score for pain is a percentage score from 0 to 100, 0 representing extreme problems and 100 representing no problems.

    Time frame: Pre-operative, 2 and 6 weeks and 6 and 12 months and analyzed and reported for pre-op, 6- and 12-months follow up

  5. Ability to Perform Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) as Per the KOOS Sub-scale for ADLs

    KOOS is a self-reported outcome measure assessing the patient's opinion about health, symptoms, and functionality of their knee. There are 5 sub-scales: symptoms, pain, activity of daily living, sports/recreation and quality of life. The score is a percentage score from 0 to 100 with 0 representing extreme problems and 100 representing no problems.

    Time frame: Collected at pre-operative, 2 and 6 weeks and 6 and 12 months, analyzed and reported for pre-op, 6 and 12-months

  6. Patellar Crepitus Defined as No Crepitus, FINE or COARSE

    Patellar Crepitus (grinding in the knee) analyzed and reported for pre-op, 6-months and 12-months and classified as No Crepitus, FINE or COARSE.

    Time frame: Collected at Pre-operative, 6 weeks and 6 and 12 months

  7. Subject Satisfaction

    Secondary objective to compare the pre-op goals and post-op satisfaction through the interpretation of data collected with the use of Palm technology for bilateral knee patients

    Time frame: Collected pre-and post-op, reported at 12-months

  8. Single Leg Active Flexion (SLAF)

    Weight-bearing single leg active flexion (SLAF). A medically trained professional conducts this test using a goniometer, which is an angle-measuring device. Of note, pre-op patients have a lower number because they were unable or unwilling to participate in SLAF due to pain.

    Time frame: Pre-op, 6- and 12-months

07

Results

Posted Apr 5, 2011

Participant flow

There were eight clinical investigators participating in the investigation. Subjects who were to receive simultaneous bilateral knee replacement were recruited for this study, where one knee was to receive the PFC Sigma Rotating Platform high flexion (RP-F) device and the other knee was to receive the PFC Sigma Rotating Platform (RP) device. 93 Subjects were enrolled in the study.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePFC® Sigma™ RP-F, Posterior Stabilized Total Knee ReplacementPFC® Sigma™ RP, Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Replacement
Started9391
Completed7574
Not completed1817

Outcome measures

SecondarySubgroup Analysis - Passive Flexion Analyzed and Reported for Pre-op, 6- and 12-months, for Subjects With Less Than 120 Degrees Passive Flexion Pre-op in Either Knee

The patient lies supine (on their back) on the table and a medically trained professional moves the limb to bend the knee to a maximum flexion position. The angle of flexion is measured with a goniometer, which is an angle-measuring device.

Time frame:
Collected at Pre-operative, 2 and 6 weeks and 6- and 12-months, analyzed and reported for pre-op, 6- and 12-months
Reported as:
Mean · Degrees of passive flexion
Subgroup Analysis - Passive Flexion Analyzed and Reported for Pre-op, 6- and 12-months, for Subjects With Less Than 120 Degrees Passive Flexion Pre-op in Either Knee
Degrees of passive flexionPassive Flexion for Standard Knee Device at Pre-opPassive Flexion for Standard Knee Device at 6-monthsPassive Flexion for Standard Knee Device at 12-monthsPassive Flexion for High Flexion Knee Device at Pre-opPassive Flexion for High Flexion Knee Device at 6-monthsPassive Flexion for High Flexion Knee Device at 12-months
Subgroup Analysis - Passive Flexion Analyzed and Reported for Pre-op, 6- and 12-months, for Subjects With Less Than 120 Degrees Passive Flexion Pre-op in Either Knee111.6 ± 6.0118.9 ± 13.9120.2 ± 11.3111.4 ± 5.8120.9 ± 12.7124.7 ± 9.8
SecondaryPatient Specific Anthropometrics

Various Patient specific anthropometrics were examined to assess their potential influence and interaction on post-op outcomes.

Time frame:
Collected at pre-op
Reported as:
Mean · Centimeters
Patient Specific Anthropometrics
CentimetersThigh Circumference in Centimeters (cm)Ankle Circumference in Centimeters (cm)Skin-fold in Centimeters (cm)
Patient Specific Anthropometrics50.2 ± 6.324.8 ± 2.73.23 ± 1.46
SecondaryAmerican Knee Society (AKS) Score

AKS Score post-op at 12-months is reported for the final visit AKS score is a 0 -100-point scale with 100 being best knee condition.

Time frame:
Collected Pre-operative, 2 and 6 weeks and 6 and 12 months follow up. Reporting for final 12-month interval
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
American Knee Society (AKS) Score
Units on a scaleAKS for the Standard Knee DeviceAKS for the High Flexion Knee Device
American Knee Society (AKS) Score85.6 ± 11.587.0 ± 10.7
SecondaryKOOS Pain Sub-score

KOOS is a self-reported outcome measure assessing the patient's opinion about health, symptoms, and functionality of their knee. There are 5 sub-scales: symptoms, pain activity of daily living, sports/recreation and quality of life. Further, the sub-score for pain is a percentage score from 0 to 100, 0 representing extreme problems and 100 representing no problems.

Time frame:
Pre-operative, 2 and 6 weeks and 6 and 12 months and analyzed and reported for pre-op, 6- and 12-months follow up
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
KOOS Pain Sub-score
Units on a scaleKOOS Pain Sub-score Standard Knee Device at Pre-opKOOS Pain Sub-score Standard Knee Device at 6-monthsKOOS Pain Sub-score Standard Knee Device at 12-monthsKOOS Pain Sub-score High Flexion Knee Device at Pre-opKOOS Pain Sub-score High Flexion Knee Device at 6-monthsKOOS Pain Sub-score High Flexion Knee Device at 12-months
KOOS Pain Sub-score45.7 ± 19.284.0 ± 14.889.5 ± 14.045.3 ± 18.283.1 ± 14.990.0 ± 11.8
SecondaryAbility to Perform Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) as Per the KOOS Sub-scale for ADLs

KOOS is a self-reported outcome measure assessing the patient's opinion about health, symptoms, and functionality of their knee. There are 5 sub-scales: symptoms, pain, activity of daily living, sports/recreation and quality of life. The score is a percentage score from 0 to 100 with 0 representing extreme problems and 100 representing no problems.

Time frame:
Collected at pre-operative, 2 and 6 weeks and 6 and 12 months, analyzed and reported for pre-op, 6 and 12-months
Reported as:
Mean · Points on a scale
Ability to Perform Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) as Per the KOOS Sub-scale for ADLs
Points on a scaleKOOS Sub-scale for Activity of Daily Living (ADL) for Standard Knee Device at Pre-opKOOS Sub-scale for Activity of Daily Living for Standard Knee Device at 6-months.KOOS Sub-scale for Activity of Daily Living for Standard Knee Device at 12-months.KOOS Sub-scale for Activity of Daily Living for High Flexion Knee Device at Pre-opKOOS Sub-scale for Activity of Daily Living for High Flexion Knee Device at 6-monthsKOOS Sub-scale for Activity of Daily Living for High Flexion Knee Device at 12-months
Ability to Perform Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) as Per the KOOS Sub-scale for ADLs49.0 ± 20.285.4 ± 14.090.4 ± 11.847.9 ± 19.285.6 ± 12.790.1 ± 11.3
SecondaryPatellar Crepitus Defined as No Crepitus, FINE or COARSE

Patellar Crepitus (grinding in the knee) analyzed and reported for pre-op, 6-months and 12-months and classified as No Crepitus, FINE or COARSE.

Time frame:
Collected at Pre-operative, 6 weeks and 6 and 12 months
Reported as:
Count of units · Knees
Patellar Crepitus Defined as No Crepitus, FINE or COARSE
KneesPatellar Crepitus in Standard (RP) Flexion Cohort at Pre-OpPatellar Crepitus in High Flexion Cohort (RPF) at Pre-opPatellar Crepitus in Standard Flexion (RP) Cohort at 6-monthsPatellar Crepitus in High Flexion (RPF) Cohort at 6 MonthsPatellar Crepitus in Standard Flexion (RP) Cohort at 12-monthsPatellar Crepitus in High Flexion (RPF) Cohort at 12-months
NO Crepitus151344415252
FINE Crepitus313721292222
COARSE Crepitus45429544
SecondarySubject Satisfaction

Secondary objective to compare the pre-op goals and post-op satisfaction through the interpretation of data collected with the use of Palm technology for bilateral knee patients

Time frame:
Collected pre-and post-op, reported at 12-months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Subject Satisfaction
ParticipantsAll Bilateral Patients Reporting Satisfaction at 12-months After Knee Replacement
Subject Satisfaction84
PrimaryKnee Society Passive Flexion at 6 Months

The patient lies supine (on their back) on the table and a medically trained professional moves the limb to bend the knee to a maximum flexion position. The angle of flexion is measured with a goniometer, which is an angle-measuring device.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · Degrees of passive flexion
Knee Society Passive Flexion at 6 Months
Degrees of passive flexionPFC® Sigma™ RP-F, Posterior Stabilized Total Knee ReplacementPFC® Sigma™ RP, Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Replacement
Knee Society Passive Flexion at 6 Months124.2 ± 11.2124.0 ± 10.6
SecondarySingle Leg Active Flexion (SLAF)

Weight-bearing single leg active flexion (SLAF). A medically trained professional conducts this test using a goniometer, which is an angle-measuring device. Of note, pre-op patients have a lower number because they were unable or unwilling to participate in SLAF due to pain.

Time frame:
Pre-op, 6- and 12-months
Reported as:
Mean · Degrees of flexion
Single Leg Active Flexion (SLAF)
Degrees of flexionSingle Leg Active Flexsion (SLAF) for the Standard Knee Device at Pre-opSingle Leg Active Flexion (SLAF) for Standard Knee Device at 6-monthsSingle Leg Active Flexion (SLAF) for Standard Knee Device at 12-monthsSingle Leg Active Flexion (SLAF) High Flexion Knee Device at Pre-opSingle Leg Active Flexion (SLAF) for the High Flexion Knee Device at 6-monthsSingle Leg Active Flexion (SLAF) for the High Flexion Knee Device at 12-months
Single Leg Active Flexion (SLAF)124.6 ± 11.1126.0 ± 11.0126.6 ± 10.6120.9 ± 13.3125.2 ± 10.8127.5 ± 11.1

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
PFC® Sigma™ RP-F, Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Replacement—3/93 (3.2%)10/93 (10.8%)
PFC® Sigma™ RP, Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Replacement—2/91 (2.2%)8/91 (8.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPFC® Sigma™ RP-F, Posterior Stabilized Total Knee ReplacementPFC® Sigma™ RP, Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Replacement
InfectionInfections and infestations1/931/91
LooseningInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/931/91
Polyethylene FailureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/930/91
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPFC® Sigma™ RP-F, Posterior Stabilized Total Knee ReplacementPFC® Sigma™ RP, Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Replacement
RespiratoryRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders8/938/91
MusculoskeletalMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders5/934/91

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PFC® Sigma™ RP-F, Posterior Stabilized Total Knee ReplacementPFC® Sigma™ RP, Posterior Stabilized Total Knee ReplacementTotal
Mean61.4 ± 5.661.4 ± 5.761.4 ± 5.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(knees)PFC® Sigma™ RP-F, Posterior Stabilized Total Knee ReplacementPFC® Sigma™ RP, Posterior Stabilized Total Knee ReplacementTotal
Female6160121
Male323163
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(knees)PFC® Sigma™ RP-F, Posterior Stabilized Total Knee ReplacementPFC® Sigma™ RP, Posterior Stabilized Total Knee ReplacementTotal
United States — United States9391184
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • Doug Dennis
    Denver, Colorado 80210, United States
  • Heekin Orthopaedics
    Jacksonville, Florida 32204, United States
  • University of Iowa Hospital & Clinic Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery
    Iowa City, Iowa 01075, United States
  • Lakewood Orthopaedic Surgeons
    Lakewood, Washington 98499, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Tippett SR, Mang J, Dwyer KA, Lesko J, O'Dell T. Collecting data with Palm technology: comparing preoperative expectations and postoperative satisfaction in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Dec;92 Suppl 2:59-67. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00827. No abstract available. PubMed 21123592 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2006 to primary completion in Dec 2009, 45 months.

Results were first posted in Apr 2011, 1 year 4 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 26, 2006
First posted
Sep 27, 2006
StartActual
Mar 1, 2006
Primary completionActual
Dec 1, 2009
CompletionActual
Dec 1, 2009
Results first posted
Apr 5, 2011
Last update
Jul 24, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00380861
Lead sponsor
DePuy Orthopaedics
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 27, 2006
Start date
Mar 1, 2006
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2009
Completion
Dec 1, 2009
Results posted
Apr 5, 2011
Last update
Jul 24, 2023

Study contacts

Tammy O'Dell, EMT, CCRA, CCRC
study director · DePuy Orthopaedics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion