CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00336401Updated Jul 30, 2010

Peri-Operative And Long-Term Cardioprotective Properties Of Sevoflurane In High Risk Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery

A Phase 4 interventional study of Sevoflurane or Propofol in Non Cardiac Surgery, sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 45 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-07-30.

Sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto · Phase 4 and Interventional

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Non-cardiac surgery is associated with significant cardiac morbidity and mortality. Volatile anesthetics have a cardioprotective effects which results in preservation of left ventricular function and lower troponin I levels. Lower troponin release has been correlated with better long term event free survival in both cardiac and non cardiac surgery. A recently completed meta-analysis suggests that sevoflurane is a superior volatile agent. The evidence of a cardioprotective effect in non-cardiac surgery is lacking. Base on the current literature, we intend to evaluate the protective potential of sevoflurane versus propofol anesthesia in high risk patients undergoing elective non-cardiac procedures.

Hypothesis: The use of Sevoflurane as a general anesthetic reduces postoperative troponin release, the incidence of myocardial infarction and/or long term morbidity in patients at low to moderate risk of postoperative cardiac complications, who are undergoing noncardiac surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non Cardiac Surgery

Keywords

  • anesthesia
  • non cardiac surgery
  • cardiac outcomes
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University Health Network, Toronto is the lead sponsor of 1,411 studies on the registry; 292 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Any patient undergoing non-cardiac surgery is eligible if s/he: 1.) is ≥45 years old;2.) Has an expected length of stay ≥48 hours; AND3.) Fulfills any 2 of the six criteria for high cardiac risk as defined by the revised Cardiac Risk Index.(see details in protocol)4.) Informed consent

Exclusion criteria:A patient will be ineligible for this study if s/he:1) Prior adverse reaction to sevoflurane (MH patient) or propofol.2) Previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery with complete revascularization in the preceding five years with no evidence of cardiac ischemia since the procedure; or3) Has concomitant life-threatening disease likely to limit life expectancy to \<30 days. -

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single

Interventions

  • DrugSevoflurane or Propofol
06

Study locations

1 site
  • Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada
07

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 30, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00336401
Lead sponsor
University Health Network, Toronto
First posted
Jun 13, 2006
Start date
Oct 2006
Completion
Feb 2008
Last update
Jul 30, 2010

Study contacts

Scott Beattie, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2006. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion