CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00325039TOMUSUpdated Jan 14, 2014Results posted

TOMUS-Trial Of Mid-Urethral Slings

A Phase 4 interventional study of retropubic mid-urethral sling (TVT) and transobturator mid-urethral sling (TVT-O and the Monarc) in Urinary Incontinence, sponsored by Carelon Research. Completed at 11 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 21 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-01-14.

Sponsored by Carelon Research · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
597
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The primary aim of this clinical trial is to compare treatment success for two minimally invasive surgical procedures to treat stress urinary incontinence in women. These procedures are called mid-urethral slings. The secondary aims of the trial are to compare other outcomes for the two surgical procedures, including quality of life, sexual function, satisfaction with treatment outcomes, complications, and the need for other treatments(s) after surgery. Follow-up will be a minimum of two years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Incontinence

Keywords

  • Urinary Incontinence, Stress
  • Surgery
03

In context

Urinary Incontinence

1,363 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Incontinence; 228 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 597 is above the median of 66 across 1,011 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Incontinence.

Browse Urinary Incontinence studies →

Lead sponsor

Carelon Research is the lead sponsor of 55 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Female
  • Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) as evidenced by all of the following:
  • Self-reported stress-type urinary incontinence symptoms, of duration ≥ 3 months
  • Medical, Epidemiological and Social Aspects of Aging (MESA) stress symptom score (percent of total possible stress score) greater than MESA urge symptom score (percent of total possible urge score)
  • Observation of leakage by provocative stress test at a bladder volume ≤ 300ml
  • Bladder capacity ≥ 200ml by stress test
  • Post-void residual (PVR) ≤ 100cc with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) Stage I or lower. If POP is Stage II-IV, PVR >100cc but ≤ 500cc is allowed
  • Eligible for both retropubic and transobturator procedures
  • No medical contraindications, e.g., current urinary tract infection (UTI), history of pelvic irradiation, history of lower urinary tract cancer
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I, II, or III
  • No current intermittent catheterization
  • Available for 24-months of follow-up and able to complete study assessments, per clinician judgment
  • Signed consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \<21 years
  • Non-ambulatory (ambulatory with assistive devices does not exclude the patient)
  • Pregnancy by self-report or positive pregnancy test, or self-reported intention to ever become pregnant
  • Current chemotherapy or current or history of pelvic radiation therapy
  • Systemic disease known to affect bladder function (i.e., Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, spina bifida, spinal cord injury or trauma)
  • Urethral diverticulum, current or previous (i.e. repaired)
  • Prior augmentation cystoplasty or artificial sphincter
  • Implanted nerve stimulators for urinary symptoms
  • History of synthetic sling for stress urinary incontinence
  • \<12 months post-partum
  • Laparoscopic or open pelvic surgery \<3 months*
  • Current evaluation or treatment for chronic pelvic pain (painful bladder syndrome)
  • Participation in another treatment intervention trial that might influence the results of this trial
  • Need for concomitant surgery requiring an abdominal incision, use of graft material in the anterior compartment, or any use of synthetic graft material
  • Enrollment in other urinary incontinence trials including SISTEr/E-SISTEr or BE-DRI/E-BE-DRI
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
597 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    1

    retropubic mid-urethral sling (TVT) The specific TVT used was the Tension-free Vaginal Tape (Gynecare)

    Procedure: retropubic mid-urethral sling (TVT)

  • Active comparator
    2

    transobturator mid-urethral sling (TVT-O and the Monarc) Two transobturator slings were used: the Tension-free Vaginal Tape Obturator (Gynecare), which is placed starting inside the vagina and coming out through the obturator foramen ("in-to-out") or the Monarc (American Medical System), which is placed starting in the groin area, passing through the obturator foramen, and then into the vagina ("out-to-in").

    Procedure: transobturator mid-urethral sling (TVT-O and the Monarc)

Interventions

  • Procedureretropubic mid-urethral sling (TVT)

    This trial is a comparison of two types of mid-urethral slings. The retropubic mid-urethral mesh sling is used for treatment of stress incontinence; this procedure was less invasive than the fascial sling procedures that were reference standards at the start of the study. Specifically, a synthetic tape is passed transvaginally at the midurethral level through the retropubic space.

  • Proceduretransobturator mid-urethral sling (TVT-O and the Monarc)

    This trial is a comparison of two types of mid-urethral slings. The transobturator mid-urethral sling is used for treatment of stress incontinence; this procedure was developed to minimize the potential for bladder and bowel injuries associated with the retropubic sling, since the sling is passed through the obturator canal, avoiding the pelvic organs in the retropubic space.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Objective Treatment Success at 12 Months

    Objective treatment success: negative stress test, negative pad test, and no retreatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) including behavioral, pharmacologic or surgical procedures A provocative stress test standardized to volume and position is performed for direct observation of urine leakage. Observed urine loss from the urethra coincidental with the Valsalva maneuver or cough is a positive test; a negative test indicates no urine loss. Pad testing quantifies the amount of urine involuntarily lost and is used to reflect everyday incontinence; it is negative if loss is \<15g/24 hrs.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Subjective Treatment Success at 12 Months

    Absence of self-reported symptoms of stress-type urinary incontinence, as assessed with the use of the Medical, Epidemiological and Social Aspects of Aging (MESA) questionnaire (responded never to all 9 MESA questions), no leakage recorded in a 3-day voiding diary and no retreatment for stress incontinence including behavioral, pharmacologic or surgical treatment.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Satisfaction at 12 Months

    Patient satisfaction was assessed at the 12 month visit with the questions, "how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the result of bladder surgery related to urine leakage?" Possible responses were completely satisfied, mostly satisfied, neutral, mostly dissatisfied, and completely dissatisfied. Completely and mostly satisfied were reported as "satisfied" and neutral, most dissatisfied and completely dissatisfied as "not satisfied".

    Time frame: Follow-Up

  2. Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 12 Months

    Scores on the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire range from 0 to 400 with higher scores indicating greater impact. The scores are changes from baseline to the 12 month visit (baseline - 12 months).

    Time frame: Baseline - 12 months

  3. Bother as Measured by the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI) at 12 Months

    Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI) scores range from 0 to 300 with higher scores indicating greater distress. Scores are changes from baseline to the 12 month visit (baseline - 12 months)

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Results

Posted Sep 27, 2012

Participant flow

Recruitment took place between April 2006 and June 2008. Patients were recruited from nine clinical sites. TOMUS (Trial Of Mid-Urethral Slings) was conducted by the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN), a cooperative network consisting of urologists and urogynecologists at 9 clinical centers and a biostatistical coordinating center.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRetropubic (RMUS)Transobturator (TMUS)
Started298299
Completed280285
Not completed1814
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1814

Outcome measures

PrimaryObjective Treatment Success at 12 Months

Objective treatment success: negative stress test, negative pad test, and no retreatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) including behavioral, pharmacologic or surgical procedures A provocative stress test standardized to volume and position is performed for direct observation of urine leakage. Observed urine loss from the urethra coincidental with the Valsalva maneuver or cough is a positive test; a negative test indicates no urine loss. Pad testing quantifies the amount of urine involuntarily lost and is used to reflect everyday incontinence; it is negative if loss is \<15g/24 hrs.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Objective Treatment Success at 12 Months
percentage of participantsRetropubic (RMUS)Transobturator (TMUS)
Objective Treatment Success at 12 Months80.877.7
Statistical analysis
  • Retropubic (RMUS) vs Transobturator (TMUS) · Difference in success rate (rmus-tmus): 3.0 · 95% CI -3.6 to 9.6
SecondaryPatient Satisfaction at 12 Months

Patient satisfaction was assessed at the 12 month visit with the questions, "how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the result of bladder surgery related to urine leakage?" Possible responses were completely satisfied, mostly satisfied, neutral, mostly dissatisfied, and completely dissatisfied. Completely and mostly satisfied were reported as "satisfied" and neutral, most dissatisfied and completely dissatisfied as "not satisfied".

Time frame:
Follow-Up
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants analyzed
Patient Satisfaction at 12 Months
percentage of participants analyzedRetropubic (RMUS)Transobturator (TMUS)
Patient Satisfaction at 12 Months85.990.0
Statistical analysis
  • Retropubic (RMUS) vs Transobturator (TMUS) · Chi-squared · p = 0.14 (This was not adjusted for multiple comparisons; the a priori threshold for statistical significance was 0.05.) · Difference in proportions: -4.1
PrimarySubjective Treatment Success at 12 Months

Absence of self-reported symptoms of stress-type urinary incontinence, as assessed with the use of the Medical, Epidemiological and Social Aspects of Aging (MESA) questionnaire (responded never to all 9 MESA questions), no leakage recorded in a 3-day voiding diary and no retreatment for stress incontinence including behavioral, pharmacologic or surgical treatment.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Subjective Treatment Success at 12 Months
percentage of participantsRetropubic (RMUS)Transobturator (TMUS)
Subjective Treatment Success at 12 Months62.255.8
Statistical analysis
  • Retropubic (RMUS) vs Transobturator (TMUS) · Difference in success (rmus - tmus): 6.4 · 95% CI -1.6 to 14.3
SecondaryChange in Quality of Life From Baseline to 12 Months

Scores on the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire range from 0 to 400 with higher scores indicating greater impact. The scores are changes from baseline to the 12 month visit (baseline - 12 months).

Time frame:
Baseline - 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 12 Months
units on a scaleRetropubic (RMUS)Transobturator (TMUS)
Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 12 Months126.8 ± 94.5132.9 ± 97.8
Statistical analysis
  • Retropubic (RMUS) vs Transobturator (TMUS) · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.47
SecondaryBother as Measured by the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI) at 12 Months

Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI) scores range from 0 to 300 with higher scores indicating greater distress. Scores are changes from baseline to the 12 month visit (baseline - 12 months)

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Bother as Measured by the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI) at 12 Months
units on a scaleRetropubic (RMUS)Transobturator (TMUS)
Bother as Measured by the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI) at 12 Months106.7 ± 48.0110.3 ± 51.2
Statistical analysis
  • Retropubic (RMUS) vs Transobturator (TMUS) · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.41

Adverse events

Collected over Consistent with the primary outcome reported at 12 months, adverse event data through the 12 month visit are reported here.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Retropubic (RMUS)—41/298 (13.8%)110/298 (36.9%)
Transobturator (TMUS)—19/299 (6.4%)89/299 (29.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 13
Most frequent serious events
EventRetropubic (RMUS)Transobturator (TMUS)
Bladder perforationSurgical and medical procedures15/2980/299
Vaginal epithelial perforationSurgical and medical procedures6/29813/299
Mesh exposureSurgical and medical procedures9/2985/299
Voiding dysfunction requiring surgery, use of catheter or bothRenal and urinary disorders8/2980/299
Surgical site infectionSurgical and medical procedures0/2982/299
Mesh erosionSurgical and medical procedures1/2981/299
Urethral perforationRenal and urinary disorders1/2980/299
Recurrent cystitis, leading to diagnostic cystoscopyRenal and urinary disorders1/2980/299
Postoperative bleedingBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/2980/299
Neurologic symptomsNervous system disorders1/2980/299
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 20
Most frequent other events
EventRetropubic (RMUS)Transobturator (TMUS)
GenitourinaryRenal and urinary disorders40/29824/299
Persistent urge incontinenceRenal and urinary disorders36/29830/299
Neurologic symptom of weaknessNervous system disorders7/29821/299
Vascular or hematologicVascular disorders18/2987/299
Voiding dysfunctionRenal and urinary disorders10/2984/299
Self-reported pain 6 or more weeks after procedureGeneral disorders7/2986/299
Neurologic symptom of numbnessNervous system disorders6/2987/299
Mesh exposureSurgical and medical procedures4/2983/299
Surgical site infectionSurgical and medical procedures2/2982/299
Granulation tissueSurgical and medical procedures2/2982/299

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Yrs)Retropubic (RMUS)Transobturator (TMUS)Total
Mean52.7 ± 10.553.1 ± 11.552.9 ± 11.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Retropubic (RMUS)Transobturator (TMUS)Total
Female298299597
Male000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Retropubic (RMUS)Transobturator (TMUS)Total
United States298299597
08

Study locations

11 sites
  • University of Alabama
    Birmingham, Alabama 35294, United States
  • University of California
    San Diego, California 92103, United States
  • Kaiser Permanente
    San Diego, California 92110, United States
  • Loyola University Medical Center
    Maywood, Illinois 60153, United States
  • University of Maryland
    Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
  • Oakwood Hospital/Cancer Center
    Dearborn, Michigan 48123, United States
  • William Beaumont Hospital
    Royal Oak, Michigan 48123, United States
  • University of Pittsburgh
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • University of Texas Southwestern
    Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
  • University of Texas Health Sciences Center
    San Antonio, Texas 78229-3900, United States
  • University of Utah
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Chai TC, Huang L, Kenton K, Richter HE, Baker J, Kraus S, Litman H; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN). Association of baseline urodynamic measures of urethral function with clinical, demographic, and other urodynamic variables in women prior to undergoing midurethral sling surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012 Apr;31(4):496-501. doi: 10.1002/nau.21198. Epub 2012 Feb 29. PubMed 22378483 ↗
  • Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Chai TC, Markland AD, Menefee SA, Sirls L, Sutkin G, Zimmern P, Arisco A, Huang L, Tennstedt S, Stoddard A. Risk factors for urinary tract infection following incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Oct;22(10):1255-65. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1429-9. Epub 2011 May 11. PubMed 21560012 ↗
  • Richter HE, Litman HJ, Lukacz ES, Sirls LT, Rickey L, Norton P, Lemack GE, Kraus S, Moalli P, Fitzgerald MP, Dandreo KJ, Huang L, Kusek JW; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Demographic and clinical predictors of treatment failure one year after midurethral sling surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;117(4):913-921. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820f3892. PubMed 21422865 ↗
  • Chai TC, Kenton K, Xu Y, Sirls L, Zyczynski H, Wilson TS, Rahn DD, Whitcomb EL, Hsu Y, Gormley EA. Effects of concomitant surgeries during midurethral slings (MUS) on postoperative complications, voiding dysfunction, continence outcomes, and urodynamic variables. Urology. 2012 Jun;79(6):1256-61. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.048. Epub 2012 Apr 25. PubMed 22542356 ↗
  • Brubaker L, Norton PA, Albo ME, Chai TC, Dandreo KJ, Lloyd KL, Lowder JL, Sirls LT, Lemack GE, Arisco AM, Xu Y, Kusek JW; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Adverse events over two years after retropubic or transobturator midurethral sling surgery: findings from the Trial of Midurethral Slings (TOMUS) study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;205(5):498.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.011. Epub 2011 Jul 20. PubMed 21925636 ↗
  • Nager CW, Sirls L, Litman HJ, Richter H, Nygaard I, Chai T, Kraus S, Zyczynski H, Kenton K, Huang L, Kusek J, Lemack G; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Baseline urodynamic predictors of treatment failure 1 year after mid urethral sling surgery. J Urol. 2011 Aug;186(2):597-603. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.105. Epub 2011 Jun 16. PubMed 21683412 ↗
  • Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN). The Trial of Mid-Urethral Slings (TOMUS): Design and Methodology. J Appl Res. 2008;8(1):AlboVol8No1. PubMed 24772006 ↗
  • Brubaker L, Rickey L, Xu Y, Markland A, Lemack G, Ghetti C, Kahn MA, Nagaraju P, Norton P, Chang TD, Stoddard A; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Symptoms of combined prolapse and urinary incontinence in large surgical cohorts. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Feb;115(2 Pt 1):310-316. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181cb86b2. PubMed 20093904 ↗
  • Nager CW, Kraus SR, Kenton K, Sirls L, Chai TC, Wai C, Sutkin G, Leng W, Litman H, Huang L, Tennstedt S, Richter HE; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Urodynamics, the supine empty bladder stress test, and incontinence severity. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010 Sep;29(7):1306-11. doi: 10.1002/nau.20836. PubMed 20127832 ↗
  • Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, Kenton K, Norton PA, Sirls LT, Kraus SR, Chai TC, Lemack GE, Dandreo KJ, Varner RE, Menefee S, Ghetti C, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Khandwala S, Rozanski TA, Johnson H, Schaffer J, Stoddard AM, Holley RL, Nager CW, Moalli P, Mueller E, Arisco AM, Corton M, Tennstedt S, Chang TD, Gormley EA, Litman HJ; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 3;362(22):2066-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912658. Epub 2010 May 17. PubMed 20479459 ↗
  • Richter HE, Kenton K, Huang L, Nygaard I, Kraus S, Whitcomb E, Chai TC, Lemack G, Sirls L, Dandreo KJ, Stoddard A. The impact of obesity on urinary incontinence symptoms, severity, urodynamic characteristics and quality of life. J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):622-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.09.083. Epub 2009 Dec 16. PubMed 20018326 ↗
  • Sirls LT, Tennstedt S, Albo M, Chai T, Kenton K, Huang L, Stoddard AM, Arisco A, Gormley EA. Factors associated with quality of life in women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2010 Dec;184(6):2411-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.08.019. Epub 2010 Oct 16. PubMed 20952014 ↗
  • Brubaker L, Litman HJ, Kim HY, Zimmern P, Dyer K, Kusek JW, Richter HE, Stoddard A; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Missing data frequency and correlates in two randomized surgical trials for urinary incontinence in women. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Aug;26(8):1155-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2661-5. Epub 2015 Mar 24. PubMed 25800900 ↗
  • Wai CY, Curto TM, Zyczynski HM, Stoddard AM, Burgio KL, Brubaker L, Rickey LM, Menefee SA; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network*. Patient satisfaction after midurethral sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 May;121(5):1009-1016. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31828ca49e. PubMed 23635737 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 14, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00325039
Lead sponsor
Carelon Research
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 11, 2006
Start date
Apr 2006
Primary completion
Jun 2010
Completion
Jun 2013
Results posted
Sep 27, 2012
Last update
Jan 14, 2014

Study contacts

Ann Gormley, M.D.
study chair · Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion