ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00323609Updated Jan 2, 2018Results posted

KAVIAR Study - Kyphoplasty And Vertebroplasty In the Augmentation and Restoration of Vertebral Body Compression Fractures

An interventional study of Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty in Vertebral Body Compression Fractures, sponsored by Medtronic Spine LLC. Terminated at 26 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-01-02.

Sponsored by Medtronic Spine LLC (part of Medtronic) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Why this study was terminated
Due to high number of patients terminating study early, low patient enrollment and difficulty in patient/investigator willingness for randomization
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
404
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients with osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures will be randomly assigned to treatment with balloon kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty. Over 2 years of follow-up, back pain, back function, quality of life, adverse events, subsequent fractures and cumulative healthcare costs will be compared.

Read the detailed description

Medtronic Spine LLC is sponsoring the KAVIAR study, a randomized clinical trial comparing balloon kyphoplasty to vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures (VCFs). Up to 1,234 subjects at up to 75 study centers with one to three VCFs and VB morphologies suitable for both balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty will be randomly assigned to receive one or the other procedure. Study visits will occur at baseline, 30 days postoperatively, and at 3, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. At all visits, adverse events, back pain, back function and quality of life will be assessed. In addition, a 7-day phone call will be conducted, which will include assessment of back pain, narcotic use and adverse events. At baseline, pre-discharge, 3-, 12- and 24-month visits, lateral spine x-rays will be taken. The primary endpoint will be the proportion of patients with one or more subsequent fractures at 12 and 24 months, detected radiographically as determined by a core radiology laboratory. Secondary clinical endpoints include changes from baseline in back pain, back function and quality of life, and adverse events. Secondary radiographic comparisons include the restoration and maintenance of VB height and angulation, and sagittal vertical axis, a measure of global sagittal balance. A postoperative CT scan will be evaluated to detect cement extravasation and to examine the relationship between cement distribution and clinical outcomes. Another important feature of the study is a detailed healthcare utilization data assessment. Combined with a costing methodology based on Medicare cost data and other sources, cumulative two-year healthcare costs related to VCF will be estimated. Combined with quality of life measurements, the cost analysis will allow a calculation of the relative cost-effectiveness of balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty. Sample size is based on the primary endpoint, the proportion with subsequent fractures at 12 and 24 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vertebral Body Compression Fractures

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Kyphoplasty
  • Vertebroplasty
  • Balloon Kyphoplasty
  • Inflatable Bone Tamp
  • Spine
  • Back Pain
  • Vertebral Compression Fracture
  • Vertebral Body Compression Fracture
03

In context

Back Pain

728 studies on the registry are indexed under Back Pain; 109 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 404 is above the median of 70 across 593 interventional studies indexed under Back Pain.

Browse Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Medtronic Spine LLC is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

First submitted before Medtronic Spine LLC became part of Medtronic.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

All subjects must meet all of the following criteria to be enrolled into the study:

  1. Age > 21
  2. 1 to 3 target VCFs meeting the following criteria:

    1. Fracture due to diagnosed or presumed underlying primary or secondary osteoporosis
    2. All target VCFs are between T5 and L5
    3. All target VCFs to be treated show either: i. Height change: An acute (\< 6 month) change in VB height or morphology from a previous x-ray, CT or MRI, with height loss at the anterior, middle or posterior portion of the VB consistent with a worsening of 1 or more grades by the Genant criteria (17), OR ii. Positive MRI or bone scan: VB shows hyperintense signal on STIR sequence MRI or target VB is positive on radionuclide bone scan
    4. All VCFs to be treated have fracture age (time from pain onset to evaluation by the Investigator) of 6 months or less
    5. Back pain correlating with the location of at least one VCF
  3. Treatment of all target VCFs is technically feasible by and clinically appropriate for BOTH vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty. (Team approach only: Both the vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty physician have reviewed radiographic studies and agree to this prior to enrolling the subject in the study.)
  4. Pre-treatment back pain by numerical rating scale (NRS) score > 4 (0-10 scale)
  5. Pre-treatment Oswestry Disability Index >20 (0 - 100 scale)
  6. Subject states availability for all study visits
  7. Subject is able to understand the risks and benefits of participating in the study and is willing to provide written
  8. Subject has mental capacity to comply with the protocol requirements for 2-year duration of study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Subjects who meet any of the following conditions may not be enrolled into the study:

  1. VB morphology or configuration is such that either balloon kyphoplasty OR vertebroplasty is not technically feasible for the targeted VCFs
  2. Fracture due to high-energy trauma
  3. Suspected OR proven cancer inside index vertebral body. Note that patients with chemotherapy-related osteoporosis may be included.
  4. Disabling back pain due to causes other than acute fracture (e.g., sacroiliac fracture, symptomatic degenerative disc disease, lumbar spinal stenosis)
  5. Any painful VCF with fracture age > 6 months
  6. Any objective evidence of neurologic compromise at baseline
  7. Previous balloon kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty for any VCF
  8. Spine stabilization beyond balloon kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty required for targeted VCFs
  9. Significant clinical comorbidity that may potentially interfere with long-term data collection or follow-up (e.g., dementia, severe comorbid illness)
  10. Pre-existing conditions contrary to either balloon kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty, such as:

    1. Irreversible coagulopathy or bleeding disorder. Note regarding reversible coagulopathies: Subjects on coumadin or other anticoagulants may participate. Investigators should follow routine practices for perioperative discontinuation and re-initiation of anticoagulants.
    2. Allergy to any device materials (e.g., bone cement) for balloon kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty. Note that in subjects with allergy to iodine-based contrast, other non-iodine contrast solutions may be used.
    3. Any evidence of VB or systemic infection
  11. Pregnant or
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
404 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Kyphoplasty

    Procedure: Kyphoplasty

  • Active comparator
    Vertebroplasty

    Procedure: Vertebroplasty

Interventions

  • ProcedureVertebroplasty

    Vertebroplasty involves placement of a needle into the vertebral body. Cement is injected into the vertebral body.

  • ProcedureKyphoplasty

    Balloon Kyphoplasty involves two inflatable bone tamps placed into the vertebral body in the spine. After the tamps are removed, the void is filled with viscous bone cement.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent of Subjects With One or More Subsequent Radiographic Fractures at 12 Months

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Percent of Subjects With One or More Subsequent Radiographic Fractures 24 Months

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Back Pain

    Back pain was assessed on a 10-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).

    Time frame: 7 days, 30 days, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation

  2. Back Function-Oswestry Disability Index

    The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Questionnaire was used to assess patient back function. The ODI score ranges from 0-100. The best score is 0 (no disability) and worst is 100 (maximum disability).

    Time frame: 30 days, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation

  3. Quality of Life by SF-36

    The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was used to assess general health status. The SF-36 results are summarized into two components, a physical component summary (PCS) and a mental component summary (MCS). The score for PCS and MCS is between 0 and 100, with higher scores denoting better quality of life.

    Time frame: 30 days, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation

  4. Quality of Life -- EQ5D Index

    EQ-5D index scores range from 0 to 1.0 on a scale where 0 = death and 1.0 = perfect health.

    Time frame: 30 days, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation

  5. Rate of Serious Adverse Events at 30 Days

    Rate of serious adverse events is presented as the percentage of the participants who reported serious adverse events within 30 days after initial treatment. For this study, serious adverse events (SAEs) included death, serious deterioration in health, life threatening injury/illness, hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization, or resulted in medical or surgical intervention.

    Time frame: 30 days post-operation

  6. Rate of Procedure/Device Related or Possibly Related Serious Adverse Events at 30 Days

    Rate of Procedure/Device related or possibly related serious adverse events is presented as the percentage of the participants who reported Procedure/Device related or possibly related serious adverse events within 30 days after initial treatment.

    Time frame: 30 days post-operation

  7. Change in Anterior Vertebral Body Height

    Time frame: Pre-op, Pre-discharge, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation

  8. Change in Middle Vertebral Body Height

    Time frame: Pre-op, Pre-discharge, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation

  9. Change in Posterior Vertebral Body Height

    Time frame: Pre-op, Pre-discharge, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation

  10. Change in Vertebral Body Kyphosis Angle

    The vertebral kyphosis angle was defined as the angle formed by lines drawn parallel to the superior and inferior endplates of the treated fractured vertebral body.

    Time frame: Pre-op, Pre-discharge, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation

  11. Change in Vertebral Body Local Cobb Angle (LCA)

    The vertebral body local Cobb angle is a measurement of the 3-level functional unit consisting of the treated fractured vertebral body and the nearest adjacent vertebrae and is defined as the angle formed by lines drawn parallel to the superior endplate of the cranial adjacent vertebral body and the inferior endplate of the adjacent caudal vertebral body.

    Time frame: Pre-op, Pre-discharge, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation

  12. Change in Global Sagittal Balance.

    Change in global sagittal balance as measured by sagittal vertical axis.

    Time frame: Pre-op, Pre-discharge, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation

  13. VCF-related Health Care Utilization

    Health care utilization assessments conducted by monthly phone call to participating patients.

    Time frame: Monthly for 24 months post-op

07

Results

Posted Aug 8, 2012
Limitations and caveats
The original study design required n=1,234 randomized patients; however, the study was stopped early with only n=404 enrolled patients, due to low enrollment, difficulty in willingness to randomize patients and a high proportion of early terminations

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneKyphoplastyVertebroplastyKyphoplasty Not Treated PatientsVertebroplasty Not Treated Patients
Started191190815
Completed1009100
Not completed9199815
Withdrew: Death162100
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up91000
Withdrew: Physician decision2001
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject112344
Withdrew: Other non-vcf-related medical condition3200
Withdrew: Sponsor discontinued trial292900
Withdrew: Unrelenting or severe back pain1100
Withdrew: Logistical withdrawal9501
Withdrew: Other reason11849

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercent of Subjects With One or More Subsequent Radiographic Fractures at 12 Months
Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percent of Subjects With One or More Subsequent Radiographic Fractures at 12 Months
percentage of participantsKyphoplastyVertebroplasty
No subsequent VCF64.356.5
One or more subsequent VCFs35.743.5
Statistical analysis
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · Fisher Exact · p = 0.214
SecondaryBack Pain

Back pain was assessed on a 10-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).

Time frame:
7 days, 30 days, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Back Pain
units on a scaleKyphoplastyVertebroplasty
Back pain at baseline (n=191, 190)7.8 ± 1.87.7 ± 1.8
Back pain at 7days (n=184, 180)4.2 ± 2.84.0 ± 2.5
Back pain at 30 days (n=169, 173)3.6 ± 2.93.5 ± 2.7
Back pain at 3 months (n=158, 156)3.3 ± 3.03.2 ± 2.8
Back pain at 12 months (n=142, 133)3.2 ± 3.03.5 ± 2.9
Back pain at 24 months (n=112, 108)3.7 ± 3.23.8 ± 3.0
Statistical analysis
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.430 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.655 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.756 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.503 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.837 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
SecondaryBack Function-Oswestry Disability Index

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Questionnaire was used to assess patient back function. The ODI score ranges from 0-100. The best score is 0 (no disability) and worst is 100 (maximum disability).

Time frame:
30 days, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Back Function-Oswestry Disability Index
units on a scaleKyphoplastyVertebroplasty
ODI at baseline (n=191, 189)59.0 ± 17.557.8 ± 16.0
ODI at 30 days (n=164, 156)36.2 ± 19.834.6 ± 17.6
ODI at 3 months (n=153, 141)30.4 ± 18.630.8 ± 18.0
ODI at 12 months (n=138, 119)29.2 ± 18.128.2 ± 17.8
ODI at 24 months (n=108, 93)32.1 ± 19.430.8 ± 17.8
Statistical analysis
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.785 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.393 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.875 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.833 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
SecondaryQuality of Life by SF-36

The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was used to assess general health status. The SF-36 results are summarized into two components, a physical component summary (PCS) and a mental component summary (MCS). The score for PCS and MCS is between 0 and 100, with higher scores denoting better quality of life.

Time frame:
30 days, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Quality of Life by SF-36
units on a scaleKyphoplastyVertebroplasty
SF-36 PCS at baseline (n=189, 190)27.92 ± 7.4627.78 ± 8.20
SF-36 PCS at 30 days (n=162, 155)33.09 ± 10.1334.51 ± 9.69
SF-36 PCS at 3 months (n=153, 138)36.06 ± 11.3236.27 ± 10.66
SF-36 PCS at 12 months (n=138, 118)36.07 ± 11.3337.39 ± 11.09
SF-36 PCS at 24 months (n=108, 92)34.94 ± 11.8135.10 ± 9.98
SF-36 MCS at baseline (n=189, 190)40.87 ± 13.3743.38 ± 12.73
SF-36 MCS at 30 days (n=162, 155)46.56 ± 12.8347.43 ± 12.23
SF-36 MCS at 3 months (n=153, 138)49.86 ± 11.6249.85 ± 11.16
SF-36 MCS at 12 months (n=138, 118)50.84 ± 11.7549.99 ± 11.14
SF-36 MCS at 24 months (n=108, 92)48.84 ± 13.3548.66 ± 12.24
Statistical analysis
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.180 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.822 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.291 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.996 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.983 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.576 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.393 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.722 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
SecondaryQuality of Life -- EQ5D Index

EQ-5D index scores range from 0 to 1.0 on a scale where 0 = death and 1.0 = perfect health.

Time frame:
30 days, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Quality of Life -- EQ5D Index
units on a scaleKyphoplastyVertebroplasty
EQ5D index at baseline (n=189,189)0.44 ± 0.260.42 ± 0.24
EQ5D index at 30 days (n=164, 156)0.70 ± 0.190.71 ± 0.19
EQ5D index at 3 months (n=152, 140)0.75 ± 0.180.75 ± 0.17
EQ5D index at 12 months (n=137, 119)0.76 ± 0.180.77 ± 0.16
EQ5D index at 24 months (n=108, 94)0.72 ± 0.220.74 ± 0.19
Statistical analysis
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.318 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.523 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.634 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.457 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
SecondaryRate of Serious Adverse Events at 30 Days

Rate of serious adverse events is presented as the percentage of the participants who reported serious adverse events within 30 days after initial treatment. For this study, serious adverse events (SAEs) included death, serious deterioration in health, life threatening injury/illness, hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization, or resulted in medical or surgical intervention.

Time frame:
30 days post-operation
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Rate of Serious Adverse Events at 30 Days
percentage of participantsKyphoplastyVertebroplasty
Rate of Serious Adverse Events at 30 Days26.227.4
Statistical analysis
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · Fisher Exact · p = 0.818
PrimaryPercent of Subjects With One or More Subsequent Radiographic Fractures 24 Months
Time frame:
24 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percent of Subjects With One or More Subsequent Radiographic Fractures 24 Months
percentage of participantsKyphoplastyVertebroplasty
No subsequence VCF50.942.3
One or more subsequence VCFs49.157.7
Statistical analysis
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · Fisher Exact · p = 0.226
SecondaryRate of Procedure/Device Related or Possibly Related Serious Adverse Events at 30 Days

Rate of Procedure/Device related or possibly related serious adverse events is presented as the percentage of the participants who reported Procedure/Device related or possibly related serious adverse events within 30 days after initial treatment.

Time frame:
30 days post-operation
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Rate of Procedure/Device Related or Possibly Related Serious Adverse Events at 30 Days
percentage of participantsKyphoplastyVertebroplasty
Rate of Procedure/Device Related or Possibly Related Serious Adverse Events at 30 Days4.24.2
Statistical analysis
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · Fisher Exact · p = 1.0
SecondaryChange in Anterior Vertebral Body Height
Time frame:
Pre-op, Pre-discharge, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Change in Anterior Vertebral Body Height
mmKyphoplastyVertebroplasty
Estimated Pre-Fracture (EP) height (n=231, 222)24.32 ± 3.9324.49 ± 4.09
Vertebral body height at Pre-op (n=224, 212)15.91 ± 5.7915.15 ± 6.04
Height Loss from EP/Absolute Height Loss (AHL)-8.43 ± 4.47-9.22 ± 5.15
Change from pre-op to pre-discharge (n=217, 200)2.51 ± 3.192.40 ± 3.03
Change from pre-op to 3 months (n=176, 157)1.26 ± 2.991.23 ± 3.13
Change from pre-op to 12 months (n=158, 128)1.33 ± 3.121.05 ± 2.96
Change from pre-op to 24 months (n=101, 93)1.00 ± 3.080.75 ± 3.05
Statistical analysis
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.112 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with Absolute Height Loss (AHL) as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.364 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with Absolute Height Loss (AHL) as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.185 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with Absolute Height Loss (AHL) as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.100 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with Absolute Height Loss (AHL) as covariate.)
SecondaryChange in Middle Vertebral Body Height
Time frame:
Pre-op, Pre-discharge, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Change in Middle Vertebral Body Height
mmKyphoplastyVertebroplasty
Estimated Pre-Fracture Height (EP) (n=231, 222)23.45 ± 3.4623.68 ± 3.58
Vertebral body height at pre-op (n=225, 211)16.08 ± 5.0815.92 ± 5.12
Height loss from EP/ Absolute Height Loss (AHL)-7.42 ± 4.06-7.60 ± 4.09
change from pre-op at pre-discharge (n=219, 200)2.33 ± 2.721.84 ± 2.38
Change from pre-op at 3 months (n=177, 159)1.34 ± 2.591.18 ± 2.55
Change from pre-op at 12 months (n=161, 128)1.31 ± 2.800.92 ± 2.51
Change from pre-op at 24 months (n=104, 92)0.98 ± 2.580.67 ± 2.78
Statistical analysis
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.005 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with Absolute Height Loss (AHL) as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.382 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with Absolute Height Loss (AHL) as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.196 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with Absolute Height Loss (AHL) as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.281 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with Absolute Height Loss (AHL) as covariate.)
SecondaryChange in Posterior Vertebral Body Height
Time frame:
Pre-op, Pre-discharge, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Change in Posterior Vertebral Body Height
mmKyphoplastyVertebroplasty
Estimated Pre-Fracture Height (n=231, 222)25.89 ± 3.4526.10 ± 3.67
Vertebral body height at pre-op (n=225, 210)23.41 ± 4.1123.47 ± 4.36
Height Loss from EP/Absolute Height Loss (AHL)-2.52 ± 2.47-2.49 ± 2.46
Change from pre-op to pre-discharge (n=220, 199)0.82 ± 1.740.49 ± 1.50
Change from pre-op to 3 months (n=179, 160)0.10 ± 1.640.06 ± 1.63
Change from pre-op to 12 months (n=161, 129)-0.03 ± 1.79-0.00 ± 1.78
Change from pre-op to 24 months (n=104, 93)-0.21 ± 1.55-0.30 ± 1.79
Statistical analysis
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.033 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with Absolute Height Loss (AHL) as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.981 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with Absolute Height Loss (AHL) as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.631 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with Absolute Height Loss (AHL) as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.790 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with Absolute Height Loss (AHL) as covariate.)
SecondaryChange in Vertebral Body Kyphosis Angle

The vertebral kyphosis angle was defined as the angle formed by lines drawn parallel to the superior and inferior endplates of the treated fractured vertebral body.

Time frame:
Pre-op, Pre-discharge, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
Reported as:
Mean · degree
Change in Vertebral Body Kyphosis Angle
degreeKyphoplastyVertebroplasty
Kyphosis angle at pre-op (n=219, 210)-14.17 ± 8.29-15.68 ± 8.12
Change from pre-op to pre-discharge (n=213, 195)3.10 ± 5.223.41 ± 5.67
Change from pre-op to 3 months (n=168, 155)1.78 ± 5.252.28 ± 5.72
Change from pre-op to 12 months (n=154, 127)1.97 ± 5.381.51 ± 5.30
Change from pre-op to 24 months (n=99, 92)2.09 ± 5.951.43 ± 5.01
Statistical analysis
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.663 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.933 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.089 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.036 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
SecondaryChange in Vertebral Body Local Cobb Angle (LCA)

The vertebral body local Cobb angle is a measurement of the 3-level functional unit consisting of the treated fractured vertebral body and the nearest adjacent vertebrae and is defined as the angle formed by lines drawn parallel to the superior endplate of the cranial adjacent vertebral body and the inferior endplate of the adjacent caudal vertebral body.

Time frame:
Pre-op, Pre-discharge, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation
Reported as:
Mean · degree
Change in Vertebral Body Local Cobb Angle (LCA)
degreeKyphoplastyVertebroplasty
Vertebral body LCA at pre-op (n=213, 203)-14.00 ± 19.71-15.48 ± 18.67
Change from pre-op to pre-discharge (n=203, 186)2.37 ± 5.842.84 ± 4.33
Change from pre-op to 3 months (n=166, 146)-0.22 ± 5.46-0.43 ± 6.67
Change from pre-op to 12 months (n=151, 118)0.38 ± 10.150.03 ± 8.15
Change from pre-op to 24 months (n=98, 85)-1.15 ± 8.43-0.57 ± 6.35
Statistical analysis
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.472 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.745 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.565 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
  • Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty · ANCOVA · p = 0.687 (P-value was obtained from ANCOVA with baseline value as covariate.)
SecondaryChange in Global Sagittal Balance.

Change in global sagittal balance as measured by sagittal vertical axis.

Time frame:
Pre-op, Pre-discharge, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operation

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryVCF-related Health Care Utilization

Health care utilization assessments conducted by monthly phone call to participating patients.

Time frame:
Monthly for 24 months post-op

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over 24 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Kyphoplasty—125/191 (65.4%)55/191 (28.8%)
Vertebroplasty—125/190 (65.8%)69/190 (36.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 357
Most frequent serious events
EventKyphoplastyVertebroplasty
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders42/19142/190
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications30/19132/190
Thoracic vertebral fractureMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders19/19119/190
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations10/19118/190
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders15/1917/190
PneumoniaInfections and infestations14/19112/190
Lumbar vertebral fractureMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders9/19113/190
Cardiac failure congestiveCardiac disorders6/19110/190
BronchitisInfections and infestations10/1917/190
Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders4/1918/190
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 102
Most frequent other events
EventKyphoplastyVertebroplasty
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications23/19120/190
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders9/19119/190
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders4/1915/190
Procedural painInjury, poisoning and procedural complications5/1912/190
Rib fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/1914/190
BronchitisInfections and infestations0/1913/190
Back injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1913/190
Musculoskeletal painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/1913/190
Neck painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/1913/190
Thoracic vertebral fractureMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/1913/190

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)KyphoplastyVertebroplastyTotal
Mean75.5 ± 10.375.7 ± 10.575.6 ± 10.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)KyphoplastyVertebroplastyTotal
Female151144295
Male404686
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)KyphoplastyVertebroplastyTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native011
Asian123
Black or African American347
Hispanic8210
White178181359
Other101
Current Weight
Current Weight(lbs)KyphoplastyVertebroplastyTotal
Mean154.0 ± 40.2160.2 ± 42.9157.1 ± 41.6
Current Height
Current Height(inches)KyphoplastyVertebroplastyTotal
Mean63.8 ± 4.364.5 ± 4.064.1 ± 4.2
Smoking Habit
Smoking Habit(participants)KyphoplastyVertebroplastyTotal
Never Smoked9284176
Former Smoker6884152
Current Smoker312253
Osteoporosis Cause
Osteoporosis Cause(participants)KyphoplastyVertebroplastyTotal
Suspected or confirmed primary osteoporosis179172351
Suspected or confirmed secondary osteoporosis121830
Number of patients with intend to treat VCFs
Number of patients with intend to treat VCFs(participants)KyphoplastyVertebroplastyTotal
One level of VCFs intend to treat149150299
Two levels of VCFs intend to treat333265
Three levels of VCFs intend to treat9817
08

Study locations

26 sites
  • Scottsdale Medical Imaging, Ltd
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85252, United States
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Solutions
    San Jose, California 95128, United States
  • Torrance Memorial Medical Center
    Torrance, California 90505, United States
  • Western Slope Study Group
    Grand Junction, Colorado 81501, United States
  • The Center for Spinal Disorders
    Tampa, Florida 33637, United States
  • Radiology Associates of Atlanta
    Atlanta, Georgia 30309, United States
  • Ochsner Medical Center
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70121, United States
  • William Beaumont Hospital
    Royal Oak, Michigan 48073, United States
  • Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City
    Kansas City, Missouri 64111, United States
  • Northwest Research & Educational Institute
    Billings, Montana 59101, United States
  • Renown Regional Medical Center
    Reno, Nevada 89502, United States
  • University Orthopedics
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
  • Atrium Medical Center
    Franklin, Ohio 45005, United States
  • The Toledo Hospital
    Toledo, Ohio 43606, United States
  • Clinical Radiology of Oklahoma
    Edmond, Oklahoma 73003, United States
  • The Center for Orthopedic and Neurosurgical Care and Research (The Center)
    Bend, Oregon 97701, United States
  • Reading Hospital
    Reading, Pennsylvania 19601, United States
  • The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Scott & White Memorial Hospital
    Temple, Texas 76508, United States
  • Intermountain Medical Center
    Murray, Utah 84157, United States
  • Utah Valley Regional Medical Center
    Provo, Utah 84604, United States
  • Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital
    Roanoke, Virginia 24033, United States
  • St. Mary's Hospital
    Huntington, West Virginia 25702, United States
  • Aurora Burlington Memorial Hospital
    Burlington, Wisconsin 53105, United States
  • Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53215, United States
  • Royal Victoria Hospital
    Barrie, Ontario L4M6MZ, Canada
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 2, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00323609
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 9, 2006
Start date
Aug 2006
Primary completion
Jul 2011
Completion
Jul 2011
Results posted
Aug 8, 2012
Last update
Jan 2, 2018

Study contacts

Reginald Knight, MD
principal investigator · Orthopedics International
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion