ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00322972TANAUpdated Sep 9, 2015

Trachoma Amelioration in Northern Amhara (TANA)

A Phase 4 interventional study of Mass treatment with oral azithromycin to an entire community in Trachoma and Chlamydia, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Completed at 1 site in Ethiopia. Open to participants aged 1 Year and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-09-09.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
33,000
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Year and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The WHO has initiated a program to eliminate trachoma, blinding eye infection caused by Chlamydia trachomatis, in large part by mass distributions of oral azithromycin. The proposed study will determine the frequency and treatment target of community-wide mass antibiotic treatment. We will also study the impact of mass antibiotic distribution on antibiotic-resistance in pneumococcus.

Read the detailed description

The proposed study is a group-randomized trial to determine the frequency and treatment target of community-wide mass antibiotic treatment to eliminate trachoma. We will also study the impact of community-wide antibiotic distribution on antibiotic-resistance in pneumococcus. Communities in Goncha Siso Enese district of East Gojam Zone, Ethiopia will be randomly assigned to different treatment schemes and monitored to study the following research questions:

Specific Aim 1. To determine whether biannual mass treatments is more likely to eliminate ocular chlamydia from hyper-endemic communities than annual mass treatments.

Specific Aim 2. To determine whether children form a core group for the transmission of trachoma.

Specific Aim 3. To determine whether latrine construction prevents the return of infection into a community after mass treatment.

Specific Aim 4. To determine the effect of mass azithromycin treatments on antibiotic resistance in pneumococcus and the reduction in mortality.

Specific Aim 5. To determine whether annual mass treatments are more likely to eliminate ocular chlamydia from hyper-endemic communities than biennial mass treatments.

02

Conditions studied

  • Trachoma
  • Chlamydia

Keywords

  • Bacterial Infections
  • Chlamydia Infections
  • Eye Diseases
03

In context

Trachoma

39 studies on the registry are indexed under Trachoma; 3 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 33,000 is above the median of 1,300 across 31 interventional studies indexed under Trachoma.

Browse Trachoma studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,169 studies on the registry; 372 are open to participants now.

Of its 267 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 202 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Year and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All residents residing in the state-teams which are randomly selected for this study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women
  • Children under 6 months of age
  • All those who are allergic to macrolides or azalides
  • Refusal of village chief (for village inclusion), or refusal of parent or guardian (for individual inclusion)

Individuals in these three exclusion criteria will not be given the study antibiotic azithromycin, but offered the current WHO-recommended alternative treatment to azithromycin for active trachoma, which is 1% tetracycline eye ointment, to be used twice a day, topically to both eyes, for six weeks. Note that the exclusion criteria refer to the exclusion to the treatment drug, but not to the monitoring, treatment of trachoma, and examinations.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
33,000 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    A

    Annual mass treatment

    Drug: Mass treatment with oral azithromycin to an entire community

  • Other
    B

    Biannual mass treatment

    Drug: Mass treatment with oral azithromycin to an entire community

  • Experimental
    C

    Mass administration of antibiotic; treatment of children (1-10 years of age) only

    Drug: Mass treatment with oral azithromycin to an entire community

  • No intervention
    D

    Delayed initiation of mass administration of antibiotic

  • Other
    F

    One-time mass administration only

    Drug: Mass treatment with oral azithromycin to an entire community

  • Experimental
    G

    One-time mass administration of antibiotics, plus intensive latrine construction

    Drug: Mass treatment with oral azithromycin to an entire community

Interventions

  • DrugMass treatment with oral azithromycin to an entire community

    For baseline and follow-up surveys prior to azithromycin distribution, a stratified random sample from two age groups will be chosen: 1) 60 study participants younger than 10 years old and 2) 60 study participants aged 10 years and above. Clinical examination will be performed and conjunctival swabs will be taken from all the study participants. For study arm C and D, nasopharyngeal swabs will be collected from 10 randomly selected children among the 60 participants under 10 who were recruited for conjunctival swabbing. Then a single dose of azithromycin will be distributed according to study design: in tablet form for adults; a weight-adjusted tablet dose for children ages 8-10; and pediatric suspension for children ages 1 - 7.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The average prevalence of ocular chlamydia infection in communities in an arm as determined by pooled NAAT (Nucleic Acid Amplification Test)(at 42 months for Aim 1, at 12 months for Aim 2, post-treatment relative to pre-treatment for Aim 3)

    Time frame: 42 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical active trachoma in community, as determined by the WHO simplified grading system

    Time frame: 42 months

  2. Childhood (>= 1 year of age) mortality, analyzed as 1-5, 6-10 years of age, and total

    Time frame: 42 months

  3. Macrolide resistance in pneumococcus (% resistance over time, clustered by randomization unit)

    Time frame: 42 months

  4. Average prevalence of ocular chlamydia infection in annually and biennially treated communities as determined by pooled NAAT (Nucleic Acid Amplification Test)

    Time frame: 48 months

  5. Diversity measure in the conjunctival and nasopharyngeal microbiomes of children (age 0-9)

    Time frame: 0, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Carter Center, Ethiopia
    Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Skalet AH, Cevallos V, Ayele B, Gebre T, Zhou Z, Jorgensen JH, Zerihun M, Habte D, Assefa Y, Emerson PM, Gaynor BD, Porco TC, Lietman TM, Keenan JD. Antibiotic selection pressure and macrolide resistance in nasopharyngeal Streptococcus pneumoniae: a cluster-randomized clinical trial. PLoS Med. 2010 Dec 14;7(12):e1000377. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000377. PubMed 21179434 ↗
  • Porco TC, Gebre T, Ayele B, House J, Keenan J, Zhou Z, Hong KC, Stoller N, Ray KJ, Emerson P, Gaynor BD, Lietman TM. Effect of mass distribution of azithromycin for trachoma control on overall mortality in Ethiopian children: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009 Sep 2;302(9):962-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1266. PubMed 19724043 ↗
  • Keenan JD, Ayele B, Gebre T, Zerihun M, Zhou Z, House JI, Gaynor BD, Porco TC, Emerson PM, Lietman TM. Childhood mortality in a cohort treated with mass azithromycin for trachoma. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Apr 1;52(7):883-8. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir069. PubMed 21427395 ↗
  • Lietman TM, Gebre T, Ayele B, Ray KJ, Maher MC, See CW, Emerson PM, Porco TC; TANA Study Group. The epidemiological dynamics of infectious trachoma may facilitate elimination. Epidemics. 2011 Jun;3(2):119-24. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2011.03.004. Epub 2011 Apr 6. PubMed 21624783 ↗
  • Stoller NE, Gebre T, Ayele B, Zerihun M, Assefa Y, Habte D, Zhou Z, Porco TC, Keenan JD, House JI, Gaynor BD, Lietman TM, Emerson PM. Efficacy of latrine promotion on emergence of infection with ocular Chlamydia trachomatis after mass antibiotic treatment: a cluster-randomized trial. Int Health. 2011 Jun;3(2):75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.inhe.2011.03.004. PubMed 21785663 ↗
  • Keenan JD, See CW, Moncada J, Ayele B, Gebre T, Stoller NE, McCulloch CE, Porco TC, Gaynor BD, Emerson PM, Schachter J, Lietman TM. Diagnostic characteristics of tests for ocular Chlamydia after mass azithromycin distributions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jan 25;53(1):235-40. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8493. PubMed 22159017 ↗
  • Gebre T, Ayele B, Zerihun M, House JI, Stoller NE, Zhou Z, Ray KJ, Gaynor BD, Porco TC, Emerson PM, Lietman TM, Keenan JD. Latrine promotion for trachoma: assessment of mortality from a cluster-randomized trial in Ethiopia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011 Sep;85(3):518-23. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0720. PubMed 21896815 ↗
  • House JI, Ayele B, Porco TC, Zhou Z, Hong KC, Gebre T, Ray KJ, Keenan JD, Stoller NE, Whitcher JP, Gaynor BD, Emerson PM, Lietman TM. Assessment of herd protection against trachoma due to repeated mass antibiotic distributions: a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2009 Mar 28;373(9669):1111-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60323-8. PubMed 19329003 ↗
  • Gebre T, Ayele B, Zerihun M, Genet A, Stoller NE, Zhou Z, House JI, Yu SN, Ray KJ, Emerson PM, Keenan JD, Porco TC, Lietman TM, Gaynor BD. Comparison of annual versus twice-yearly mass azithromycin treatment for hyperendemic trachoma in Ethiopia: a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2012 Jan 14;379(9811):143-51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61515-8. Epub 2011 Dec 20. PubMed 22192488 ↗
  • Ray KJ, Zhou Z, Cevallos V, Chin S, Enanoria W, Lui F, Lietman TM, Porco TC. Estimating community prevalence of ocular Chlamydia trachomatis infection using pooled polymerase chain reaction testing. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;21(2):86-91. doi: 10.3109/09286586.2014.884600. PubMed 24621121 ↗
  • Keenan JD, Ayele B, Gebre T, Moncada J, Stoller NE, Zhou Z, Porco TC, McCulloch CE, Gaynor BD, Emerson PM, Schachter J, Lietman TM. Ribosomal RNA evidence of ocular Chlamydia trachomatis infection following 3 annual mass azithromycin distributions in communities with highly prevalent trachoma. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jan 15;54(2):253-6. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir791. Epub 2011 Nov 17. PubMed 22095569 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00322972
Responsible party
Thomas M. Lietman (Professor, University of California, San Francisco) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 9, 2006
Start date
Jun 2006
Primary completion
Nov 2009
Completion
May 2014
Last update
Sep 9, 2015

Study contacts

Tom Lietman, MD
principal investigator · Proctor Foundation, UCSF
Kieran S O'Brien, MPH
study director · Proctor Foundation, UCSF
Paul Emerson, PhD
study director · Emory University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion