CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00321919Updated Jun 29, 2016Results posted

A Study of Treatment With NeoRecormon (Epoetin Beta) in Patients With Chronic Renal Anemia

A Phase 3 interventional study of epoetin beta [NeoRecormon] and epoetin beta [NeoRecormon] in Anemia, sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche. Completed at 93 sites in 22 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-06-29.

Sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
605
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will evaluate whether anemia prevention with NeoRecormon has an additional impact on reducing cardiovascular risk over conventional anemia treatment in patients mostly with stage IV chronic kidney disease and renal anemia. The anticipated time on study treatment is 2+ years and the target sample size is 500+ individuals.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anemia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Anemia

1,733 studies on the registry are indexed under Anemia; 246 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 605 is above the median of 94 across 1,291 interventional studies indexed under Anemia.

Browse Anemia studies →

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche is the lead sponsor of 2,061 studies on the registry; 85 are open to participants now.

Of its 319 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 239 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • adult patients >=18 years of age;
  • chronic renal anemia;
  • not receiving renal replacement therapy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • women who are pregnant or lactating;
  • previous treatment with erythropoietin or other erythropoietic substance;
  • blood transfusion within the last 3 months;
  • need for dialysis expected in the next 6 months;
  • administration of another investigational drug within 30 days preceding study start, or during the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
605 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Early Epoetin Beta Therapy

    Participants received immediate epoetin beta therapy starting at 2000 IU, subcutaneously once weekly up to four years to reach a target Hb level of 13-15 g/dL; with an individual Hb increase of at least 2 g/dL within approximately 3 months.

    Drug: epoetin beta [NeoRecormon]

  • Active comparator
    Late Epoetin Beta Therapy

    Participants received epoetin beta treatment starting at 2000 IU, subcutaneously once weekly up to four years only when a decline in Hb levels to \<10.5 g/dL had occurred in order to reach a target Hb of 10.5-11.5 g/dL.

    Drug: epoetin beta [NeoRecormon]

Interventions

  • Drugepoetin beta [NeoRecormon]

    Participants in the early treatment group immediately started epoetin beta treatment to reach a target Hb level of 13-15 g/dL at the end of the correction phase.

  • Drugepoetin beta [NeoRecormon]

    Participants in the late treatment Group started epoetin beta treatment once a decline in Hb level to \<10.5 g/dL had occurred.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Median Time to First Cardiovascular Event

    The cardiovascular event was defined as any of the following: angina pectoris leading to hospitalization for at least 24 hours or prolongation of hospitalization, acute heart failure, fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal or non-fatal stroke, sudden death, transient cerebral ischemic attack (TIA), peripheral vascular disease (amputation, necrosis), cardiac arrhythmias leading to hospitalization for at least 24 hours or prolongation of hospitalization. The time to occurrence of a cardiovascular event was determined as the time from randomization until any of the above listed events whichever occurred first. The first event per participant was used for the analysis. Only events confirmed by the Endpoint Committee were considered for analysis.

    Time frame: Up to 4 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Median Time to Death Due to Cardiovascular Events

    Time to death due to cardiovascular events is the time determined between randomization and death due to cardiovascular events.

    Time frame: Up to 4 years

  2. Number of Participants Who Died Due to Cardiovascular Events

    The cardiovascular event was defined as any of the following: angina pectoris leading to hospitalization for at least 24 hours or prolongation of hospitalization, acute heart failure, fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal or non-fatal stroke, sudden death, transient cerebral ischemic attack (TIA), peripheral vascular disease (amputation, necrosis), cardiac arrhythmias leading to hospitalization for at least 24 hours or prolongation of hospitalization.

    Time frame: Up to 4 years

  3. Median Time to Death Due to All Causes

    Time to death due to all causes is the time determined between randomization and death due to all causes.

    Time frame: Up to 4 years

  4. Number of Participants Who Died Due to All Causes

    Number of participants who died due to all causes are presented in table below.

    Time frame: Up to 4 years

  5. Number of Participants Experiencing Worsening of New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class (CL) of Chronic Heart Failure From Baseline (BL)

    The NYHA functional classification assesses the severity of symptoms of chronic heart failure and is comprised of four classes. Class I is defined as no limitation of physical activity, Class II is defined as slight limitation of physical activity, Class III is defined as marked limitation of physical activity, and Class IV is defined as unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Shifts of participants from CL 0, CL I, CL II, CL III, CL IV at Baseline (Day 1) to CL 0, CL I, CL II, CL III, CL IV during the study period was determined and presented.

    Time frame: Up to 4 years

  6. Median Time to First Cardiovascular Intervention

    Time to first cardiovascular intervention is the time between randomization and first intervention determined for all cardiovascular interventions after randomization. Cardiovascular interventions considered were: angioplasty with or without stents/atherectomy, coronary artery bypass surgery, cardioverter defibrillator (CD) cardioversion/defibrillation, temporary pacemaker, permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation.

    Time frame: Up to 4 years

  7. Total Number of Cardiovascular Intervention

    Cardiovascular intervention was defined by a clinical review of all concomitant treatments. The cardiovascular interventions considered were: angioplasty with or without stents/atherectomy, coronary artery bypass surgery, cardioverter defibrillator (CD) cardioversion/defibrillation, temporary pacemaker, permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation. The total number of cardiovascular intervention was determined and presented by each cohort.

    Time frame: Up to 4 years

  8. Median Time to First Hospitalization Due to Cardiovascular Events

    Time to first hospitalization due to cardiovascular events is defined as the time determined between randomization and first hospitalization due to cardiovascular events.

    Time frame: Up to 4 years

  9. Duration of Hospitalization for Cardiovascular Events

    The duration of hospitalization was the total number of days that a participant was hospitalized due to cardiovascular events. Participants with no hospitalization were excluded from analysis.

    Time frame: Up to 4 years

  10. Mean Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI)

    LVMI is determined by echocardiogram. LVMI indexed to body surface area (gram/square meter) estimated by LV cavity dimension and wall thickness at end-diastole. The change was calculated as week value minus baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, and Week 48

  11. Mean Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and Fractional Myocardial Shortening (FS)

    LVEF is a marker of left ventricular systolic function and determined by echocardiogram. It is expressed as the ratio of left ventricular stroke volume (LVSV) to left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and is measured as a percentage. FS is used as an estimate of myocardial contractility and determined by echocardiogram and measures as a percentage. The change for LVEF and FS was calculated as Week value minus baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, and Week 48

  12. Mean Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Volume (LV Volume )

    Left Ventricular Volume is the estimated of left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDv) and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) determined by Echocardiogram. The change was calculated as week value minus baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, and Week 48

  13. Mean Values of Echocardiography Parameters

    Mean values of Echocardiography (ECHO) Parameters: Left Ventricular End Diastolic Diameter (LVEDD), Left Ventricular Posterior Wall Thickness (LVPWT), IV Septal Wall Thickness (IVSWT), LV End Systolic Diameter (LVESD), LV Relative wall thickness (LVRWT) at Baseline, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3 and Year 4 were presented.

    Time frame: Baseline, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, and Year 4

  14. Mean Values of Body Surface Area

    The body surface area (BSA) was determined by Echocardiogram. Absolute mean values of Echocardiography (ECHO) Parameter: Body surface area (BSA) at Baseline, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3 and Year 4 were calculated and presented.

    Time frame: Baseline, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, and Year 4.

  15. Mean Change From Baseline in the Scores of Each of The Eight Health Scales of Quality of Life Based on Short Form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire

    The Quality of life was assessed on the basis of a change from baseline in the scores of each of the eight health scales in the SF-36 questionnaire. The SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains (consisting of 2 components; physical and mental) of functional health and well-being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role (role-physical, role-emotional) limitations, bodily pain, general health (GH), vitality, mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled from 0 (worst level of functioning) to 100 (100=best level of functioning). The least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline was determined by Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model and presented for each of the eight health scale.

    Time frame: Baseline, Year 1, and Year 2

  16. Number of Participants on Blood Pressure/Anti-Hypertensive Treatment According to Class Of Drugs

    Anti-hypertensive is defined as class of drugs that are used to treat hypertension. Numbers (No.) of participants treated with at least one hypertensive medication/Treatment (Tt) according to class of drugs were reported.

    Time frame: Up to 4 years

  17. Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities

    Marked abnormality of laboratory parameters is defined as the value which is outside the defined reference range of that respective parameter. Values above and below the given reference range were determined as High or Low range values of the laboratory parameter. Roche's standard reference ranges for laboratory test parameters were used for the analysis. The laboratory parameters with marked abnormality are platelets (reference range is 150-350 10\^9 cells/liter \[L\]), creatinine (reference range is 0-133 micromole per liter), albumin (reference range is 35.0-55 g/L), phosphate (reference range is 0.84-1.45 millimole per liter \[mmol /L\]) and potassium (reference range is 3.4-4.8 mmol /L).

    Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to 4 years

07

Results

Posted May 25, 2016

Participant flow

This study was conducted from 26 July 2000 to 13 December 2004 at 94 centers in 21 countries.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEarly Epoetin Beta TherapyLate Epoetin Beta Therapy
Started301302
Completed226250
Not completed7552
Withdrew: Adverse event1710
Withdrew: Death2117
Withdrew: Insufficient therapeutic response10
Withdrew: Violation of selection criteria at entry11
Withdrew: Refused treatment2314
Withdrew: Other protocol violation23
Withdrew: Failure to return31
Withdrew: Other withdrawal reason76

Outcome measures

PrimaryMedian Time to First Cardiovascular Event

The cardiovascular event was defined as any of the following: angina pectoris leading to hospitalization for at least 24 hours or prolongation of hospitalization, acute heart failure, fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal or non-fatal stroke, sudden death, transient cerebral ischemic attack (TIA), peripheral vascular disease (amputation, necrosis), cardiac arrhythmias leading to hospitalization for at least 24 hours or prolongation of hospitalization. The time to occurrence of a cardiovascular event was determined as the time from randomization until any of the above listed events whichever occurred first. The first event per participant was used for the analysis. Only events confirmed by the Endpoint Committee were considered for analysis.

Time frame:
Up to 4 years
Reported as:
Median · days
Median Time to First Cardiovascular Event
daysEarly Epoetin Beta TherapyLate Epoetin Beta Therapy
Median Time to First Cardiovascular EventNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Early Epoetin Beta Therapy vs Late Epoetin Beta Therapy · Regression, Cox · p = 0.2036 · Risk ratio (rr): 0.778976 · 95% CI 0.53 to 1.14The Cox regression model was used to estimate the relative risk of the time to first cardiovascular event in Late Epoetin beta therapy group compared to the Early Epoetin beta therapy group.
SecondaryMedian Time to Death Due to Cardiovascular Events

Time to death due to cardiovascular events is the time determined between randomization and death due to cardiovascular events.

Time frame:
Up to 4 years
Reported as:
Median · days
Median Time to Death Due to Cardiovascular Events
daysEarly Epoetin Beta TherapyLate Epoetin Beta Therapy
Median Time to Death Due to Cardiovascular EventsNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Early Epoetin Beta Therapy vs Late Epoetin Beta Therapy · Regression, Cox · p = 0.4833 · Risk ratio (rr): 0.744575 · 95% CI 0.33 to 1.70The Cox regression model was used to estimate the relative risk of an event of the time to death due to cardiovascular reasons in Late Epoetin beta therapy group compared to the Early Epoetin beta therapy group.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Died Due to Cardiovascular Events

The cardiovascular event was defined as any of the following: angina pectoris leading to hospitalization for at least 24 hours or prolongation of hospitalization, acute heart failure, fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal or non-fatal stroke, sudden death, transient cerebral ischemic attack (TIA), peripheral vascular disease (amputation, necrosis), cardiac arrhythmias leading to hospitalization for at least 24 hours or prolongation of hospitalization.

Time frame:
Up to 4 years
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Who Died Due to Cardiovascular Events
participantsEarly Epoetin Beta TherapyLate Epoetin Beta Therapy
Total Cardiovascular Death Events86
Cardiac Failure12
Cardiac Failure Acute12
Acute Myocardial Infarction11
Angina Pectoris10
Arrhythmia10
Cardiac Arrest10
Cardio-Respiratory Arrest10
Cardiopulmonary Failure10
Myocardial Infarction01
SecondaryMedian Time to Death Due to All Causes

Time to death due to all causes is the time determined between randomization and death due to all causes.

Time frame:
Up to 4 years
Reported as:
Median · days
Median Time to Death Due to All Causes
daysEarly Epoetin Beta TherapyLate Epoetin Beta Therapy
Median Time to Death Due to All CausesNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Early Epoetin Beta Therapy vs Late Epoetin Beta Therapy · Regression, Cox · p = 0.1391 · Risk ratio (rr): 0.658259 · 95% CI 0.38 to 1.15The Cox regression model was used to estimate the relative risk of the time to death for all causes in Late Epoetin beta therapy group compared to the Early Epoetin beta therapy treatment group.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Died Due to All Causes

Number of participants who died due to all causes are presented in table below.

Time frame:
Up to 4 years
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Who Died Due to All Causes
participantsEarly Epoetin Beta TherapyLate Epoetin Beta Therapy
Total Death Events for All-cause3121
Sudden Death42
Cerebrovascular Accident22
Cardiac Failure12
Cardiac Failure Acute12
Sepsis12
Acute Myocardial Infarction11
Bronchopneumonia11
Respiratory Failure11
Septic Shock20
Acute Heart Failure10
Acute Respiratory Failure01
Angina Pectoris10
Arrhythmia10
Cardiac Arrest10
Cardio-Respiratory Arrest10
Cardiopulmonary Failure10
Cerebral Infarction10
Clostridial Infection10
Colon Cancer Metastatic01
Embolic Stroke10
Intestinal Infarction01
Intestinal Ischaemia01
Laryngeal Cancer10
Lung Neoplasm Malignant01
Metastases To Lung10
Metastatic Neoplasm10
Myocardial Infarction01
Oesophageal Carcinoma10
Peripheral Vascular Disorder10
Pneumonia01
Pulmonary Embolism01
Renal Failure10
Unevaluable Event10
Uraemic Encephalopathy10
SecondaryNumber of Participants Experiencing Worsening of New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class (CL) of Chronic Heart Failure From Baseline (BL)

The NYHA functional classification assesses the severity of symptoms of chronic heart failure and is comprised of four classes. Class I is defined as no limitation of physical activity, Class II is defined as slight limitation of physical activity, Class III is defined as marked limitation of physical activity, and Class IV is defined as unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Shifts of participants from CL 0, CL I, CL II, CL III, CL IV at Baseline (Day 1) to CL 0, CL I, CL II, CL III, CL IV during the study period was determined and presented.

Time frame:
Up to 4 years
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Experiencing Worsening of New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class (CL) of Chronic Heart Failure From Baseline (BL)
participantsEarly Epoetin Beta TherapyLate Epoetin Beta Therapy
From CL 0 (BL) to CL 0; n = 167, 1494942
From CL 0 (BL) to CL I; n = 167, 14974
From CL 0 (BL) to CL II; n = 167, 14977
From CL 0 (BL) to CL III; n = 167, 14921
From CL 0 (BL) to CL IV; n = 167, 14900
From CL I (BL) to CL 0; n = 37, 4310
From CL I (BL) to CL I; n = 37, 432834
From CL I (BL) to CL II; n = 37, 4354
From CL I (BL) to CL III; n = 37, 4300
From CL I (BL) to CL IV; n = 37, 4300
From CL II (BL) to CL 0; n = 53, 4400
From CL II (BL) to CL I; n = 53, 4451
From CL II (BL) to CL II; n = 53, 443937
From CL II (BL) to CL III; n = 53, 4424
From CL II (BL) to CL IV; n = 53, 4400
From CL III (BL) to CL 0; n = 0, 000
From CL III (BL)to CL I; n = 0, 000
From CL III (BL)to CL II; n = 0, 000
From CL III (BL)to CL III; n = 0, 000
From CL III (BL)to CL IV; n = 0, 000
From CL IV (BL)to CL 0; n = 0, 000
From CL IV (BL)to CL I; n = 0, 000
From CL IV (BL)to CL II; n = 0, 000
From CL IV (BL)to CL III; n = 0, 000
From CL IV (BL)to CL IV; n = 0, 000
SecondaryMedian Time to First Cardiovascular Intervention

Time to first cardiovascular intervention is the time between randomization and first intervention determined for all cardiovascular interventions after randomization. Cardiovascular interventions considered were: angioplasty with or without stents/atherectomy, coronary artery bypass surgery, cardioverter defibrillator (CD) cardioversion/defibrillation, temporary pacemaker, permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation.

Time frame:
Up to 4 years
Reported as:
Median · days
Median Time to First Cardiovascular Intervention
daysEarly Epoetin Beta TherapyLate Epoetin Beta Therapy
Median Time to First Cardiovascular InterventionNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Early Epoetin Beta Therapy vs Late Epoetin Beta Therapy · Regression, Cox · p = 0.4985 · Risk ratio (rr): 0.804594 · 95% CI 0.43 to 1.51The Cox regression model was used to estimate the relative risk of time to first cardiovascular intervention in Late Epoetin beta therapy group compared to the Early Epoetin beta therapy group
SecondaryTotal Number of Cardiovascular Intervention

Cardiovascular intervention was defined by a clinical review of all concomitant treatments. The cardiovascular interventions considered were: angioplasty with or without stents/atherectomy, coronary artery bypass surgery, cardioverter defibrillator (CD) cardioversion/defibrillation, temporary pacemaker, permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation. The total number of cardiovascular intervention was determined and presented by each cohort.

Time frame:
Up to 4 years
Reported as:
Number · number of cardiovascular intervention
Total Number of Cardiovascular Intervention
number of cardiovascular interventionEarly Epoetin Beta TherapyLate Epoetin Beta Therapy
Total Number of Cardiovascular Intervention2118
SecondaryMedian Time to First Hospitalization Due to Cardiovascular Events

Time to first hospitalization due to cardiovascular events is defined as the time determined between randomization and first hospitalization due to cardiovascular events.

Time frame:
Up to 4 years
Reported as:
Median · days
Median Time to First Hospitalization Due to Cardiovascular Events
daysEarly Epoetin Beta TherapyLate Epoetin Beta Therapy
Median Time to First Hospitalization Due to Cardiovascular EventsNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Early Epoetin Beta Therapy vs Late Epoetin Beta Therapy · Regression, Cox · p = 0.3419 · Risk ratio (rr): 0.82046 · 95% CI 0.55 to 1.23The Cox regression model was used to estimate the relative risk of the time to first hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons in Late Epoetin beta therapy group compared to the Early Epoetin beta therapy group.
SecondaryDuration of Hospitalization for Cardiovascular Events

The duration of hospitalization was the total number of days that a participant was hospitalized due to cardiovascular events. Participants with no hospitalization were excluded from analysis.

Time frame:
Up to 4 years
Reported as:
Mean · days
Duration of Hospitalization for Cardiovascular Events
daysEarly Epoetin Beta TherapyLate Epoetin Beta Therapy
Duration of Hospitalization for Cardiovascular Events33.0 ± 42.028.2 ± 33.7
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI)

LVMI is determined by echocardiogram. LVMI indexed to body surface area (gram/square meter) estimated by LV cavity dimension and wall thickness at end-diastole. The change was calculated as week value minus baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, and Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · gram/square meter
Mean Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI)
gram/square meterEarly Epoetin Beta TherapyLate Epoetin Beta Therapy
LVMI, Baseline; n = 219, 232120.32 ± 35.03117.97 ± 34.34
LVMI, Week 12; n = 171, 186-5.06 ± 24.81-2.87 ± 25.16
LVMI, Week 24; n = 136, 146-6.58 ± 26.94-7.59 ± 25.59
LVMI, Week 36; n = 74, 81-1.30 ± 36.04-7.53 ± 34.37
LVMI, Week 48; n = 2, 112.00 ± 2.83-27.27 ± 29.47
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and Fractional Myocardial Shortening (FS)

LVEF is a marker of left ventricular systolic function and determined by echocardiogram. It is expressed as the ratio of left ventricular stroke volume (LVSV) to left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and is measured as a percentage. FS is used as an estimate of myocardial contractility and determined by echocardiogram and measures as a percentage. The change for LVEF and FS was calculated as Week value minus baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, and Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · percentage
Mean Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and Fractional Myocardial Shortening (FS)
percentageEarly Epoetin Beta TherapyLate Epoetin Beta Therapy
LVEF, Baseline; n = 219, 23381.31 ± 7.2481.95 ± 7.75
LVEF, Week 12; n = 170, 186-0.08 ± 7.320.08 ± 7.34
LVEF, Week 24; n = 135, 147-0.47 ± 6.82-0.23 ± 7.01
LVEF, Week 36; n = 74, 81-0.61 ± 8.610.24 ± 6.75
LVEF, Week 48; n = 2,11-0.46 ± 2.922.80 ± 8.12
FS, Baseline; n = 219, 23243.67 ± 7.1244.67 ± 7.86
FS, Week 12; n = 196, 2120.13 ± 6.790.08 ± 7.34
FS, Week 24; n = 174, 1920.11 ± 7.10-0.19 ± 7.40
FS, Week 36; n = 98, 1050.05 ± 8.160.70 ± 7.80
FS, Week 48; n = 4,121.00 ± 2.833.00 ± 8.58
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Volume (LV Volume )

Left Ventricular Volume is the estimated of left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDv) and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) determined by Echocardiogram. The change was calculated as week value minus baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, and Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · milliliters per meter square
Mean Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Volume (LV Volume )
milliliters per meter squareEarly Epoetin Beta TherapyLate Epoetin Beta Therapy
LV Volume, Baseline; n = 218, 23267.73 ± 19.2065.11 ± 19.24
LV Volume, Week 12; n = 170, 186-2.83 ± 15.903.15 ± 15.46
LV Volume, Week 24; n = 134, 146-0.69 ± 16.442.62 ± 18.56
LV Volume, Week 36; n = 72, 803.34 ± 24.294.05 ± 19.08
LV Volume, Week 48; n = 2, 1114.48 ± 11.527.91 ± 23.37
SecondaryMean Values of Echocardiography Parameters

Mean values of Echocardiography (ECHO) Parameters: Left Ventricular End Diastolic Diameter (LVEDD), Left Ventricular Posterior Wall Thickness (LVPWT), IV Septal Wall Thickness (IVSWT), LV End Systolic Diameter (LVESD), LV Relative wall thickness (LVRWT) at Baseline, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3 and Year 4 were presented.

Time frame:
Baseline, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, and Year 4
Reported as:
Mean · centimeters
Mean Values of Echocardiography Parameters
centimetersEarly Epoetin Beta TherapyLate Epoetin Beta Therapy
LVEDD, Baseline, n = 219, 2335.05 ± 0.674.91 ± 0.68
LVEDD, Year 1, n = 170, 1864.93 ± 0.624.94 ± 0.65
LVEDD, Year 2, n = 135, 1474.95 ± 0.634.93 ± 0.72
LVEDD, Year 3, n = 74, 815.09 ± 0.714.88 ± 0.59
LVEDD, Year 4, n = 2,115.21 ± 0.305.08 ± 0.79
LVPWT, Baseline, n = 219, 2331.05 ± 0.171.05 ± 0.17
LVPWT, Year 1, n = 170, 1861.02 ± 0.171.01 ± 0.16
LVPWT, Year 2, n= 135, 1471.01 ± 0.130.99 ± 0.14
LVPWT, Year 3, n = 74, 811.01 ± 0.171.00 ± 0.13
LVPWT, Year 4, n = 2,111.08 ± 0.130.92 ± 0.16
IVSWT, Baseline, n = 219, 2331.18 ± 0.241.20 ± 0.28
IVSWT, Year 1, n = 170, 1861.17 ± 0.231.13 ± 0.24
IVSWT, Year 2, n = 135, 1471.12 ± 0.211.11 ± 0.20
IVSWT, Year 3, n = 74, 811.14 ± 0.251.12 ± 0.22
IVSWT, Year 4, n = 2, 111.30 ± 0.051.04 ± 0.20
LVESD, Baseline, n = 219, 2332.85 ± 0.582.74 ± 0.66
LVESD, Year 1, n = 170, 1862.76 ± 0.562.73 ± 0.62
LVESD, Year 2, n = 135, 1472.78 ± 0.582.75 ± 0.68
LVESD, Year 3, n = 74, 812.88 ± 0.752.67 ± 0.59
LVESD, Year 4, n = 2, 112.93 ± 0.222.84 ± 0.57
LVRWT, Baseline, n = 219, 2330.42 ± 0.080.43 ± 0.09
LVRWT, Year 1, n = 170, 1860.42 ± 0.080.41 ± 0.08
LVRWT, Year 2, n = 135, 1470.41 ± 0.060.41 ± 0.07
LVRWT, Year 3, n = 74, 810.41 ± 0.090.42 ± 0.07
LVRWT, Year 4, n = 2, 110.41 ± 0.030.37 ± 0.07
SecondaryMean Values of Body Surface Area

The body surface area (BSA) was determined by Echocardiogram. Absolute mean values of Echocardiography (ECHO) Parameter: Body surface area (BSA) at Baseline, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3 and Year 4 were calculated and presented.

Time frame:
Baseline, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, and Year 4.
Reported as:
Mean · Square meter
Mean Values of Body Surface Area
Square meterEarly Epoetin Beta TherapyLate Epoetin Beta Therapy
BSA, Baseline, n = 287, 2901.83 ± 0.221.79 ± 0.20
BSA, Year 1, n = 257, 2611.83 ± 0.221.77 ± 0.23
BSA, Year 2, n = 224, 2341.82 ± 0.211.77 ± 0.19
BSA, Year 3, n = 116, 1211.82 ± 0.211.72 ± 0.19
BSA, Year 4, n = 4, 111.96 ± 0.211.76 ± 0.22
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in the Scores of Each of The Eight Health Scales of Quality of Life Based on Short Form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire

The Quality of life was assessed on the basis of a change from baseline in the scores of each of the eight health scales in the SF-36 questionnaire. The SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains (consisting of 2 components; physical and mental) of functional health and well-being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role (role-physical, role-emotional) limitations, bodily pain, general health (GH), vitality, mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled from 0 (worst level of functioning) to 100 (100=best level of functioning). The least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline was determined by Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model and presented for each of the eight health scale.

Time frame:
Baseline, Year 1, and Year 2
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in the Scores of Each of The Eight Health Scales of Quality of Life Based on Short Form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire
units on a scaleEarly Epoetin Beta TherapyLate Epoetin Beta Therapy
General Health, Year 14.1 ± 1.01-0.1 ± 0.99
General Health, Year 22.3 ± 1.14-1.9 ± 1.08
Mental Health, Year 12.7 ± 0.98-2.1 ± 0.96
Mental Health, Year 22.0 ± 1.07-0.4 ± 1.02
Physical Function, Year 13.5 ± 1.1-2.1 ± 1.1
Physical Function, Year 2-2.5 ± 1.33-2.5 ± 1.27
Physical Role, Year 12.6 ± 2.23-5.5 ± 2.20
Physical Role, Year 2-2.3 ± 2.59-7.3 ± 2.47
Social Function, Year 11.8 ± 1.23-3.0 ± 1.21
Social Function, Year 2-0.1 ± 1.44-3.0 ± 1.37
Vitality Function, Year 13.9 ± 0.97-0.6 ± 0.95
Vitality Function, Year 22.8 ± 1.10-1.0 ± 1.05
Bodily Pain, Year 1-0.2 ± 1.37-2.1 ± 1.35
Bodily Pain, Year 2-2.0 ± 1.53-1.2 ± 1.46
Emotional Role, Year 10.4 ± 2.17-4.3 ± 2.14
Emotional Role, Year 2-0.1 ± 2.51-2.2 ± 2.42
Statistical analysis
  • Early Epoetin Beta Therapy vs Late Epoetin Beta Therapy · ANCOVA · p = 0.0029
  • Early Epoetin Beta Therapy vs Late Epoetin Beta Therapy · ANCOVA · p = 0.0081
  • Early Epoetin Beta Therapy vs Late Epoetin Beta Therapy · ANCOVA · p = 0.0005
  • Early Epoetin Beta Therapy vs Late Epoetin Beta Therapy · ANCOVA · p = 0.0965
  • Early Epoetin Beta Therapy vs Late Epoetin Beta Therapy · ANCOVA · p = 0.0004
  • Early Epoetin Beta Therapy vs Late Epoetin Beta Therapy · ANCOVA · p = 0.9864
  • Early Epoetin Beta Therapy vs Late Epoetin Beta Therapy · ANCOVA · p = 0.0097
  • Early Epoetin Beta Therapy vs Late Epoetin Beta Therapy · ANCOVA · p = 0.1670
  • Early Epoetin Beta Therapy vs Late Epoetin Beta Therapy · ANCOVA · p = 0.0058
  • Early Epoetin Beta Therapy vs Late Epoetin Beta Therapy · ANCOVA · p = 0.1455
  • Early Epoetin Beta Therapy vs Late Epoetin Beta Therapy · ANCOVA · p = 0.0009
  • Early Epoetin Beta Therapy vs Late Epoetin Beta Therapy · ANCOVA · p = 0.0123
  • Early Epoetin Beta Therapy vs Late Epoetin Beta Therapy · ANCOVA · p = 0.3155
  • Early Epoetin Beta Therapy vs Late Epoetin Beta Therapy · ANCOVA · p = 0.7076
  • Early Epoetin Beta Therapy vs Late Epoetin Beta Therapy · ANCOVA · p = 0.1291
  • Early Epoetin Beta Therapy vs Late Epoetin Beta Therapy · ANCOVA · p = 0.5528
SecondaryNumber of Participants on Blood Pressure/Anti-Hypertensive Treatment According to Class Of Drugs

Anti-hypertensive is defined as class of drugs that are used to treat hypertension. Numbers (No.) of participants treated with at least one hypertensive medication/Treatment (Tt) according to class of drugs were reported.

Time frame:
Up to 4 years
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants on Blood Pressure/Anti-Hypertensive Treatment According to Class Of Drugs
participantsEarly Epoetin Beta TherapyLate Epoetin Beta Therapy
No. of participants with at least one Tt287282
Calcium Channel Blocking Agents201204
Loop Diuretics183180
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors158153
Beta-Adrenoceptor Blocking Agents169136
Angiotensin-II Receptor Antagonists8996
Alpha-Adrenoreceptor Antagonists8773
Antihypertensive Agents5552
Thiazide And Related Diuretics4440
Antianginal Agents65
Potassium Sparing Diuretics47
Aldosterone Antagonists25
Cardiac Glycosides11
Diuretics20
Supplements11
Calcium Compounds And Regulators01
Miscellaneous Drugs01
Tricyclic Antidepressants10
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities

Marked abnormality of laboratory parameters is defined as the value which is outside the defined reference range of that respective parameter. Values above and below the given reference range were determined as High or Low range values of the laboratory parameter. Roche's standard reference ranges for laboratory test parameters were used for the analysis. The laboratory parameters with marked abnormality are platelets (reference range is 150-350 10\^9 cells/liter \[L\]), creatinine (reference range is 0-133 micromole per liter), albumin (reference range is 35.0-55 g/L), phosphate (reference range is 0.84-1.45 millimole per liter \[mmol /L\]) and potassium (reference range is 3.4-4.8 mmol /L).

Time frame:
Baseline, every 3 months up to 4 years
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
participantsEarly Epoetin Beta TherapyLate Epoetin Beta Therapy
Platelets - High; n = 206, 20850
Platelets - Low; n = 206, 2081315
Creatinine - High; n = 206, 208140128
Albumin - Low; n = 201, 20569
Phosphate - High; n = 206, 208164150
Phosphate - Low; n = 206, 2082223
Potassium - High; n = 206, 2084746
Potassium - Low; n = 206, 20846

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 4 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Early Epoetin Beta Therapy—158/300 (52.7%)243/300 (81%)
Late Epoetin Beta Therapy—145/302 (48%)228/302 (75.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 306
Most frequent serious events
EventEarly Epoetin Beta TherapyLate Epoetin Beta Therapy
Cardiac Failure AcuteCardiac disorders11/30019/302
Renal FailureRenal and urinary disorders17/30012/302
ArrhythmiaCardiac disorders16/30014/302
Myocardial InfarctionCardiac disorders13/30014/302
Peripheral Vascular DisorderVascular disorders12/3007/302
Angina PectorisCardiac disorders11/3004/302
PneumoniaInfections and infestations9/3009/302
Renal ImpairmentRenal and urinary disorders5/3009/302
Urinary Tract InfectionInfections and infestations4/3008/302
Renal Failure ChronicRenal and urinary disorders7/3006/302
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 31
Most frequent other events
EventEarly Epoetin Beta TherapyLate Epoetin Beta Therapy
Renal FailureRenal and urinary disorders93/30087/302
HypertensionVascular disorders89/30058/302
Renal Failure ChronicRenal and urinary disorders33/30046/302
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders22/30033/302
HeadacheNervous system disorders30/30015/302
HyperkalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders28/30030/302
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations26/30029/302
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations16/30028/302
Renal ImpairmentRenal and urinary disorders27/30023/302
HyperphosphataemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders27/30022/302

Baseline characteristics

Baseline characteristics were described for the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, which included all participants randomized according to their randomized treatment group, regardless of the treatment actually received.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Early Epoetin Beta TherapyLate Epoetin Beta TherapyTotal
Mean59.3 ± 14.5758.8 ± 13.7359.0 ± 14.14
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Early Epoetin Beta TherapyLate Epoetin Beta TherapyTotal
Female130148278
Male171154325
08

Study locations

93 sites
  • Linz, 4020, Austria
  • St Pölten, 3100, Austria
  • Bruxelles, 1070, Belgium
  • Bruxelles, 1090, Belgium
  • Edegem, 2650, Belgium
  • Brno, 625 00, Czech Republic
  • Havirov, 736 01, Czech Republic
  • Olomouc, 775 20, Czech Republic
  • Ostrava, 708 52, Czech Republic
  • Fredericia, 7000, Denmark
  • Herlev, 2730, Denmark
  • Holbaek, 4300, Denmark
  • Roskilde, 4000, Denmark
  • Jyväskylä, 40620, Finland
  • Tampere, 33521, Finland
  • Amiens, 80054, France
  • Angouleme, 16470, France
  • Bordeaux, 33000, France
  • Boulogne, 62321, France
  • Colmar, 68024, France
  • Lyon, 69437, France
  • Montpellier, 34295, France
  • Paris, 75743, France
  • Saint Brieuc, 22023, France
  • Troyes, 10003, France
  • Vandoeuvre-les-nancy, 54511, France
  • Berlin, 13353, Germany
  • Villingen-schwenningen, 78054, Germany
  • Würzburg, 97072, Germany
  • Athens, 115 27, Greece
  • Thessaloniki, 546 42, Greece
  • Veria, 59100, Greece
  • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • Dublin, 9, Ireland
  • Bologna, 40138, Italy
  • Busto Arsizio, 21052, Italy
  • Cagliari, 09134, Italy
  • Cinisello Balsamo, 20092, Italy
  • Lecco, 23900, Italy
  • Napoli, 80131, Italy
  • Padova, 35128, Italy
  • Parma, 43100, Italy
  • Pavia, 27100, Italy
  • Roma, 00144, Italy
  • Roma, 00146, Italy
  • Roma, 00152, Italy
  • San Giovanni Rotondo, 71013, Italy
  • Trieste, 34125, Italy
  • Vimercate, 20059, Italy
  • Cuernavaca, 62448, Mexico
  • Tijuana, 44650, Mexico
  • Oslo, 0407, Norway
  • Gdansk, 80-211, Poland
  • Kielce, 25-736, Poland
  • Krakow, 31-501, Poland
  • Wroclaw, 50-417, Poland
  • Almada, 2800, Portugal
  • Carnaxide, 2799-523, Portugal
  • Lisboa, 1800-083, Portugal
  • Porto, 4200-319, Portugal
  • Moscow, 123182, Russian Federation
  • Moscow, 125101, Russian Federation
  • Moscow, Russian Federation
  • St Petersburg, 195067, Russian Federation
  • St Petersburg, 197110, Russian Federation
  • Barcelona, 08035, Spain
  • Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35020, Spain
  • Madrid, 28007, Spain
  • Madrid, 28046, Spain
  • Valencia, 46009, Spain
  • Boras, 50182, Sweden
  • Helsingborg, 25187, Sweden
  • Jonkoping, 55185, Sweden
  • Karlstad, 65185, Sweden
  • Norrkoping, 60182, Sweden
  • Oerebro, 70185, Sweden
  • Stockholm, 17176, Sweden
  • Sundsvall, 85186, Sweden
  • Taichung, 407, Taiwan
  • Tainan, 701, Taiwan
  • Taipei, 100, Taiwan
  • Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan
  • Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
  • Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
  • Ankara, 06100, Turkey
  • Istanbul, 34390, Turkey
  • Izmir, 35100, Turkey
  • Belfast, BT9 7AB, United Kingdom
  • London, SE22 8PT, United Kingdom
  • Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, United Kingdom
  • Salford, M6 8HD, United Kingdom
  • Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
  • Surrey, SM5 1AA, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Locatelli F, Eckardt KU, Macdougall IC, Tsakiris D, Clyne N, Burger HU, Scherhag A, Drueke TB; Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Early Anaemia Trial with Epoetin Beta investigators and coordinators. Value of N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide as a prognostic marker in patients with CKD: results from the CREATE study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Nov;26(11):2543-52. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.516237. Epub 2010 Sep 17. PubMed 20849244 ↗
  • Drueke TB, Locatelli F, Clyne N, Eckardt KU, Macdougall IC, Tsakiris D, Burger HU, Scherhag A; CREATE Investigators. Normalization of hemoglobin level in patients with chronic kidney disease and anemia. N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 16;355(20):2071-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062276. PubMed 17108342 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 29, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00321919
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 4, 2006
Start date
Jul 2000
Primary completion
Oct 2004
Completion
Dec 2004
Results posted
May 25, 2016
Last update
Jun 29, 2016

Study contacts

Clinical Trials
study chair · Hoffmann-La Roche
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion