CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00320112Updated Apr 24, 2015Results posted

Improving Insulin Therapy With Enhanced Care Management

A Phase 3 interventional study of Reciprocal Diabetes Peer Support Program and Nurse Case management in Diabetes, sponsored by US Department of Veterans Affairs. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-04-24.

Sponsored by US Department of Veterans Affairs · Phase 3 and Interventional

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
244
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

VA diabetes patients often have difficulty managing their self-care and accessing clinic-based services; many also lack social support to help them meet the demands of their illness. Enhanced support is especially important when undertaking and sustaining new challenging self-care tasks, such as initiating or intensifying insulin treatment regimens. Although some VAs have implemented telephone nurse care management programs supported by automated calling services, many are reluctant to adopt these models due to nursing shortages.

Read the detailed description

Background:

VA diabetes patients often have difficulty managing their self-care and accessing clinic-based services; many also lack social support to help them meet the demands of their illness. Enhanced support is especially important when undertaking and sustaining new challenging self-care tasks, such as initiating or intensifying insulin treatment regimens. Although some VAs have implemented telephone nurse care management programs supported by automated calling services, many are reluctant to adopt these models due to nursing shortages.

Objectives:

This randomized trial will evaluate an intervention using a low-cost interactive voice response (IVR) exchange system to promote peer-to-peer communication among diabetes patients initiating or increasing insulin therapy under medical guidance. The intervention is based on research demonstrating the positive impact of peer support on chronic disease outcomes and self-care behaviors, our own prior studies demonstrating the effectiveness of IVR-based self-management supports for VA diabetes patients, and a successful pilot study demonstrating VA diabetes patients' willingness to participate in IVR-facilitated peer support. The Specific Aims are: (1) To evaluate the effect of IVR-facilitated peer support on diabetes patients' glycemic control (including their A1c levels, insulin doses, hypo- and hyperglycemic symptoms) and use of VA care; (2) To assess the impact of IVR-facilitated peer support on patient-centered outcomes, including patients' satisfaction with care, perceived social support, diabetes-specific quality of life, and self-care behaviors; and (3) To identify patient characteristics associated with participation and use of IVR peer support, and mediators of the intervention's impact on patient outcomes.

Methods:

324 diabetes patients with inadequate glycemic control who are candidates for insulin initiation or intensification will be recruited from 2 VA facilities (Ann Arbor, and Toledo). We will pair eligible patients based on age, gender, and whether they are initiating or increasing insulin. Pairs will be randomized to either: 1) usual care; or 2) usual care in conjunction with the IVR-based peer support program. After their orientation, intervention participants will be asked to communicate weekly with their partner using the IVR exchange. The IVR service is designed to allow patients to communicate without divulging their home phone number, experiencing toll charges, or being responsible for insuring that contacts occur without the assistance of reminder prompts. Intervention patients who have achieved adequate glycemic control at their 6-month follow up will be encouraged to select a new treatment goal. Patients will continue to participate in weekly IVR calls for 6 months. Research staff will monitor the process via the Internet, and outcomes will be measured at six months. The primary endpoint will be HbA1c levels at 6 and 12-months. Secondary endpoints include other physiological measures and patient-centered outcomes. The intervention is designed to interact with standard outpatient VA staffing models. We will develop detailed training materials that facilitate implementation in other facilities and work with clinical managers to facilitate roll-out if the intervention is found to be effective.

Status:

Recruitment of participants is complete as well as most preliminary data analyses. 12 month data is now being analyzed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes

Keywords

  • telemedicine
  • case management
  • insulin
  • self-care
03

In context

Lead sponsor

US Department of Veterans Affairs is the lead sponsor of 658 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • type 2 diabetes
  • HbA1c > 7%
  • age > 21

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • substance abuse disorder
  • serious psychiatric illness
  • serious hearing loss
  • life expectancy \< 12 months
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
244 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Reciprocal Diabetes Peer Support program

    peers are paired during the group visit and are encouraged to speak with their partner at least once a week for the 6 month duration of the study.

    Behavioral: Reciprocal Diabetes Peer Support Program · Behavioral: group outpatient counseling visits

  • Other
    Nurse Case Management

    patients are not paired in the NCM arm. they are provided with educational session on diabetes management and informed of case management services.

    Behavioral: Nurse Case management

Interventions

  • BehavioralReciprocal Diabetes Peer Support Program

    participants are paired with another age-matched participation. Paired peer partners were encouraged to talk weekly using a telephone platform that recorded call frequency and duration and provided automated reminders promoting peer contact.

  • BehavioralNurse Case management

    patients are not paired in the NCM arm attended a 1.5 hour session to receive education on care manager services and diabetes educational materials and be assigned to a nurse care manager with whom they were encouraged to follow-up regularly.

  • Behavioralgroup outpatient counseling visits

    Participants in the peer group were also offered three optional 1.5 hour patient-driven group sessions at month 1, 3, and 6

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Glycemic Control (HbA1c)

    The primary outcome was change between baseline and six-month Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), measured with a Bayer DCA 2000+ point-of-care analyzer.

    Time frame: 6 months (baseline to 6 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Systolic Blood Pressure Measure

    secondary outcome measure was change in blood pressure comparison of peer support group and nurse case management group from baseline to six months

    Time frame: change in blood pressure at 6 months

  2. Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure

    change in diastolic blood pressure was measured at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months from baseline

  3. Number of Participants With Insulin Starts at 6 Months

    the number of insulin starts at 6 months from baseline.

    Time frame: 6 months (baseline to 6 months follow-up)

07

Results

Posted Nov 10, 2014
Limitations and caveats
1. study only included male patients. 2. intervention only lasted six months. 3. the nature of the intervention prevented blinding to treatment group. 4. A final limitation is the relatively low rate of uptake of the intervention.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneReciprocal Diabetes Peer Support Program (RPS)Nurse Case Management
Started125119
Completed117114
Not completed85
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up34
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject30
Withdrew: Death21

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Glycemic Control (HbA1c)

The primary outcome was change between baseline and six-month Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), measured with a Bayer DCA 2000+ point-of-care analyzer.

Time frame:
6 months (baseline to 6 months)
Reported as:
Mean · percent HbA1c
Change in Glycemic Control (HbA1c)
percent HbA1cReciprocal Peer Support GroupNurse Case Management Group
Baseline percent A1c8.02 ± 1.327.93 ± 1.40
6 month percent A1c7.73 ± 1.328.22 ± 1.74
Statistical analysis
  • Reciprocal Peer Support Group vs Nurse Case Management Group · Regression, Linear · p = 0.004 (no differences between arms in baseline characteristics at \<0.1 level, further analyses adjusted for variables that could influence the outcome like insulin use, age, commodities. because no differences in results, unadjusted analyses are reported.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.58we used STATA 11's xtmixed command, which fits multi-level mixed-effects linear regression models, with clustering by assigned pairs.
SecondaryChange in Systolic Blood Pressure Measure

secondary outcome measure was change in blood pressure comparison of peer support group and nurse case management group from baseline to six months

Time frame:
change in blood pressure at 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure Measure
mmHgChange in Systolic BP at 6 Months for Peer Support GroupChange in Systsolic at 6 Months for Nurse Mgt Group
baseline systolic blood pressure140.3 ± 18.6136.4 ± 16.9
6 month systolic blood pressure136.9 ± 16.8135.0 ± 17.7
Statistical analysis
  • Change in Systolic BP at 6 Months for Peer Support Group vs Change in Systsolic at 6 Months for Nurse Mgt Group · Regression, Linear · p = .91 (this is a priori design)
SecondaryChange in Diastolic Blood Pressure

change in diastolic blood pressure was measured at 6 months

Time frame:
6 months from baseline
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure
mmHgReciprocal Peer Support GroupNurse Case Management Group
baseline diastolic blood pressure77.1 ± 11.575.8 ± 10.7
6 month diastolic blood pressure76.8 ± 11.976.1 ± 10.6
Statistical analysis
  • Reciprocal Peer Support Group vs Nurse Case Management Group · Regression, Linear · p = 0.10
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Insulin Starts at 6 Months

the number of insulin starts at 6 months from baseline.

Time frame:
6 months (baseline to 6 months follow-up)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Insulin Starts at 6 Months
participantsReciprocal Peer Support GroupNurse Case Management Grouop
Number of Participants With Insulin Starts at 6 Months81
Statistical analysis
  • Reciprocal Peer Support Group vs Nurse Case Management Grouop · Regression, Linear · p = 0.02

Adverse events

Collected over adverse event information was collected through-out the course of a participants enrollment in the study - 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Reciprocal Peer Support Intervention—2/125 (1.6%)0/125 (0%)
Nurse Case Management Intervention—1/119 (0.8%)0/119 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventReciprocal Peer Support InterventionNurse Case Management Intervention
DeathGeneral disorders2/1251/119

Baseline characteristics

125 participants were randomized to Reciprocal Peer Support (RPS), and 119 to Nurse case management (NCM).

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Receiprocal Peer SupportNurse Case ManagementTotal
Mean61.8 ± 6.162.3 ± 6.662.0 ± 6.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Receiprocal Peer SupportNurse Case ManagementTotal
Female000
Male125119244
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)Receiprocal Peer SupportNurse Case ManagementTotal
White, non-Hispanic9998197
Hispanic527
African American111122
Other9514
unkwown134
Education
Education(participants)Receiprocal Peer SupportNurse Case ManagementTotal
Some High School, High School343569
at least some college, technical\vocational school9183174
unknown011
Annual Income
Annual Income(participants)Receiprocal Peer SupportNurse Case ManagementTotal
less than or equal to $30,0007871149
greater than or equal to $31,000464187
other or unknown178
Social Support
Social Support(participants)Receiprocal Peer SupportNurse Case ManagementTotal
Lives with a spouse8284166
Lives alone292251
Other141327
Anti-hyperglycemic Medications
Anti-hyperglycemic Medications(participants)Receiprocal Peer SupportNurse Case ManagementTotal
Only oral diabetes medication5553108
Insulin, + or - oral medication7066136
Self-Rated General Health Status - Fair or Poor Health
Self-Rated General Health Status - Fair or Poor Health(participants)Receiprocal Peer SupportNurse Case ManagementTotal
Number5964123

3 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Heisler M, Vijan S, Makki F, Piette JD. Diabetes control with reciprocal peer support versus nurse care management: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Oct 19;153(8):507-15. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-8-201010190-00007. PubMed 20956707 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 24, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00320112
Lead sponsor
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 3, 2006
Start date
Feb 2007
Primary completion
Oct 2009
Completion
Mar 2010
Results posted
Nov 10, 2014
Last update
Apr 24, 2015

Study contacts

John D. Piette, PhD
principal investigator · VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion