An observational study in Influenza, sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Completed at 16 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged Up to 11 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-05-13.
Sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) · Observational
This retrospective study conducted in Canada and the US involves a chart review to assess the safety of oseltamivir (Tamiflu®) compared to alternate antiviral therapy, amantidine or rimantidine, administered to children less than 12 months of age with diagnosed or suspected influenza. The objectives are to describe the frequency of neurological and all other adverse events possibly related to administration of these antivirals in these infants. Investigators will also compare frequency of adverse events at various doses of oseltamivir in these children. Critical endpoints to be collected include frequency and severity of adverse events, particularly those relating to central nervous system complications. A sub-investigator will travel to each of the participating sites to collect data related to each infant's health prior to becoming ill, health status at time of influenza diagnosis, dosing regimen, reported neurological events post-dosing, and all reported adverse events post-dosing.
The study is a retrospective review of charts of children less than 12 months of age that were diagnosed with influenza and treated with oseltamivir. The chart review will focus on assessment of neurological and other adverse events that may have been related to the administration of oseltamivir. A control population will consist of children less than 12 months treated with either rimantadine or amantadine. The administration of oseltamivir to children at high risk (i.e. immunocompromised hosts) less than 12 months old with influenza is frequently considered in medical practice despite the findings of neurotoxicity in a juvenile rat study. Since oseltamivir is the only active treatment against H5N1 influenza strains, it is imperative to understand the ramifications of its potential widespread use in very young infants in the event of an outbreak. This study is designed to gather documented evidence by which the circumstances of use and defined outcomes can be described. Patient selection will be made by review of hospital inpatient medical records, emergency room medical records and/or pharmacy records to identify patients less than 1 yr old dosed with oseltamivir suspension. Redacting the charts will be done in a manner that will obscure personal health information (individual identifiers) without obscuring the necessary clinical data. A separate research data collection form will be prepared on which critical information can be transcribed that would subsequently be available for analysis. Critical information to be captured at the time of initiating oseltamivir treatment includes: age, birth history, gender, underlying medical conditions, presenting influenza symptoms, if done, type of flu test and dose regime. Critical endpoints to be collected will include the frequency and severity of adverse events, particularly those relating to central nervous system complications.
2,214 studies on the registry are indexed under Influenza, Human; 163 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 200 is below the median of 300 across 305 observational studies indexed under Influenza, Human.
Browse Influenza, Human studies →National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) is the lead sponsor of 2,401 studies on the registry; 179 are open to participants now.
Of its 396 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 294 (74%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
None listed
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2007. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)