CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00306527Updated Aug 14, 2019Results posted

Comparison of Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity of Influenza Vaccines in Adults and Elderly

A Phase 3 interventional study of Cell culture derived influenza vaccine and egg-derived influenza subunit vaccine in Influenza, sponsored by Novartis Vaccines. Completed at 5 sites in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-08-14.

Sponsored by Novartis Vaccines · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,235
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate safety, tolerability and immunogenicity (in a subset) following a dose of a trivalent subunit influenza vaccine produced either in mammalian cells or in embryonated hen eggs, in healthy adult and elderly subjects who received either vaccine one year before (2004) in the study V58P4.

02

Conditions studied

  • Influenza

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Influenza
  • adult/elderly
  • flu cell culture
  • vaccine
03

In context

Influenza, Human

2,214 studies on the registry are indexed under Influenza, Human; 163 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,235 is above the median of 238 across 1,853 interventional studies indexed under Influenza, Human.

Browse Influenza, Human studies →

Lead sponsor

Novartis Vaccines is the lead sponsor of 161 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. 18 to \< 61 years of age (first age group) OR 61 years of age and older (second age group) at enrolment in V58P4
  2. Mentally competent to understand the nature, the scope and the consequences of the study
  3. Able and willing to give written informed consent prior to study entry
  4. Available for all the visits scheduled in the study
  5. in good health as determined by:

    1. Medical history related to the previous six months,
    2. Physical examination,
    3. Clinical judgment of the investigator.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unwilling or unable to give written informed consent to participate in the study
  2. Currently experiencing an acute infectious disease
  3. Any serious disease such as, for example:

    1. Cancer (except for benign or localized skin cancer and non metastatic prostate cancer not currently treated with chemotherapy)
    2. Autoimmune disease (including rheumatoid arthritis)
    3. Advanced arteriosclerotic disease or complicated diabetes mellitus
    4. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring oxygen therapy
    5. Acute or progressive hepatic disease
    6. Acute or progressive renal disease
    7. Congestive heart failure
  4. Surgery planned during the study period
  5. Bleeding diathesis
  6. History of hypersensitivity to any component of the study medication or chemically related substances, such as allergy to eggs or egg products
  7. Known or suspected impairment/alteration of immune function resulting from:

    1. Receipt of immunosuppressive therapy (any cortical steroid or cancer chemotherapy)
    2. Receipt of immunostimulants
    3. Receipt of parenteral immunoglobulin preparation, blood products, and/or plasma derivatives within the past 3 months and for the full length of the study
    4. High risk for developing an immunocompromising disease
  8. History of drug or alcohol abuse
  9. Laboratory confirmed influenza disease in the past 6 months
  10. Received influenza vaccine within the past 6 months
  11. Received another vaccine or any investigational agent within the past 60 days, or expect to receive another vaccine within 3 weeks following the study vaccination
  12. Participation in another clinical trial within 90 days prior to enrollment and throughout the full length of the study
  13. Any acute respiratory disease or infections requiring systemic antibiotic or antiviral therapy (chronic antibiotic therapy for urinary tract prophylaxis is acceptable) or experienced fever _ 38°C within the past 5 days
  14. Pregnant/ breast feeding women or women who refuse to use a reliable contraceptive method during the first three weeks after vaccination
  15. Any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, might interfere with the evaluation of the study objectives.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
2,235 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    cTIV\cTIV (adults)

    Subjects (18-60 years of age) previously vaccinated with cell-derived influenza vaccine (cTIV), received one dose of cell-derived trivalent influenza vaccine (cTIV) one year later, in this study.

    Biological: Cell culture derived influenza vaccine

  • Active comparator
    cTIV\TIV (adults)

    Subjects (18-60 years of age) previously vaccinated with cell-derived influenza vaccine (cTIV), received one dose of an egg-derived trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) one year later, in this study.

    Biological: egg-derived influenza subunit vaccine

  • Active comparator
    cTIV\cTIV (elderly)

    Subjects (≥61 years of age) previously vaccinated with cell-derived influenza vaccine (cTIV), received one dose of cell-derived trivalent influenza vaccine (cTIV) one year later, in this study.

    Biological: Cell culture derived influenza vaccine

  • Active comparator
    cTIV\TIV (elderly)

    Subjects (≥61years of age) previously vaccinated with cell-derived influenza vaccine (cTIV), received one dose of an egg-derived trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) one year later, in this study.

    Biological: egg-derived influenza subunit vaccine

  • Active comparator
    TIV\TIV (adults)

    Subjects (18-60 years of age) previously vaccinated with egg-derived influenza vaccine (TIV), received one dose of egg-derived trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) one year later, in this study.

    Biological: egg-derived influenza subunit vaccine

  • Active comparator
    TIV\cTIV (adults)

    Subjects (18-60 years of age) previously vaccinated with egg-derived influenza vaccine (TIV), received one dose of cell-derived trivalent influenza (cTIV) one year later, in this study.

    Biological: Cell culture derived influenza vaccine

  • Active comparator
    TIV\TIV (elderly)

    Subjects (≥61 years of age) previously vaccinated with egg-derived influenza vaccine (TIV), received one dose of egg-derived trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) one year later, in this study.

    Biological: egg-derived influenza subunit vaccine

  • Active comparator
    TIV\cTIV (elderly)

    Subjects (≥61 years of age) previously vaccinated with egg-derived influenza vaccine (TIV), received one dose of cell-derived trivalent influenza (cTIV) one year later, in this study.

    Biological: Cell culture derived influenza vaccine

Interventions

  • BiologicalCell culture derived influenza vaccine

    as a single IM injection of 0.5 ml in the deltoid muscle, preferably of the non-dominant arm

  • Biologicalegg-derived influenza subunit vaccine

    as a single IM injection of 0.5 ml in the deltoid muscle, preferably of the non-dominant arm

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited Adverse Events After One Dose of Cell Culture-derived or the Egg-derived Influenza Vaccine

    To assess the safety and tolerability in terms of number of adult and elderly subjects reporting solicited adverse events following one dose of the cTIV or the TIV vaccine .

    Time frame: Day 1 to Day 7 postvaccination

Secondary outcomes

  1. Six-months Safety Data of Subjects After One Dose of Cell Culture Derived or Egg-derived Influenza Vaccine

    To collect additional safety data for 6 months after vaccination with one dose of cell culture derived or egg-derived influenza vaccine in terms of serious adverse events (SAEs), adverse events (AEs) necessitating a physician's visit and/or resulting in premature subject's withdrawal from study.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months postvaccination

  2. Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) After One Dose of Cell Culture-derived or the Egg-derived Influenza Vaccine in Adult and Elderly Subjects

    The haemagglutinin inhibition (HI) antibody titer response following one 0.5 mL dose of either cell derived (cTIV) or egg-derived vaccine (TIV) in adult and elderly subjects is reported as GMTs. The HI GMTs were evaluated using egg-derived antigen assay.

    Time frame: Day 22 postvaccination

  3. Geometric Mean Ratios (GMRs), After One Dose of the Cell Culture-derived or the Egg-derived Influenza Vaccine in Adult and Elderly Subjects

    Immunogenicity was assessed in terms of GMR in adult and elderly subjects following one 0.5ml dose of either the cTIV vaccine or the TIV vaccine, according to the CHMP criteria. The European licensure (CHMP) criteria was met if the mean geometric increase (GMR, day 22/day 1) in HI antibody titer is \>2.5 for adults and \>2.0 for elderly subjects.

    Time frame: Day 22 postvaccination

  4. Percentages of Adult and Elderly Subjects Achieving HI Titers ≥ 40 After One Dose of the Cell Culture-derived or the Egg-derived Influenza Vaccine.

    Immunogenicity was assessed in terms of percentages of adult and elderly subjects achieving HI titers≥40,after one dose of either the cTIV vaccine or the TIV vaccine. European (CHMP) criteria is met if the percentage of subjects achieving HI titers ≥ 40 is \> 70% for adults and \>60% for elderly.

    Time frame: Day 22 postvaccination

  5. Percentages of Adult and Elderly Subjects With Seroconversion or Significant Increase in HI Antibody Titers After One Dose of Cell Culture-derived or the Egg-derived Influenza Vaccine.

    Immunogenicity was assessed in terms of percentages of adult and elderly subjects showing seroconversion or significant increase in HI antibody titers after one dose of cell culture-derived or the egg-derived influenza vaccine. Seroconversion or significant increase as per European Licensure (CHMP) criteria is defined as percentage of subjects with a prevaccination HI titer \<10 to a postvaccination titer ≥ 40 for adults and ≥ 30 for elderly. Significant increase is defined as percentage of subjects with a prevaccination HI titer ≥ 10 and a ≥ 4-fold increase in postvaccination HI antibody titer.

    Time frame: Day 22 postvaccination

07

Results

Posted Jan 11, 2013

Participant flow

Subjects were enrolled from 5 study centers in Poland.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAdults (cTIV\cTIV) + (TIV\cTIV)Adults (cTIV\TIV) + (TIV\TIV)Elderly (cTIV\cTIV) + (TIV\cTIV)Elderly (cTIV\TIV) + (TIV\TIV)
Started533534572596
Completed527527567590
Not completed6756
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up3430
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject2303
Withdrew: Adverse event0011
Withdrew: Death1012

Outcome measures

SecondarySix-months Safety Data of Subjects After One Dose of Cell Culture Derived or Egg-derived Influenza Vaccine

To collect additional safety data for 6 months after vaccination with one dose of cell culture derived or egg-derived influenza vaccine in terms of serious adverse events (SAEs), adverse events (AEs) necessitating a physician's visit and/or resulting in premature subject's withdrawal from study.

Time frame:
Up to 6 months postvaccination
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Six-months Safety Data of Subjects After One Dose of Cell Culture Derived or Egg-derived Influenza Vaccine
ParticipantscTIV\cTIV (Adults)cTIV\TIV (Adults)cTIV\cTIV (Elderly)cTIV\TIV (Elderly)TIV\TIV (Adults)TIV\cTIV (Adults)TIV\TIV (Elderly)TIV\cTIV (Elderly)
Any AE5038705835446776
At least possibly related AE24252425
Any SAE541313041710
At least possibly related SAE00000000
Any death10010012
SecondaryGeometric Mean Titers (GMTs) After One Dose of Cell Culture-derived or the Egg-derived Influenza Vaccine in Adult and Elderly Subjects

The haemagglutinin inhibition (HI) antibody titer response following one 0.5 mL dose of either cell derived (cTIV) or egg-derived vaccine (TIV) in adult and elderly subjects is reported as GMTs. The HI GMTs were evaluated using egg-derived antigen assay.

Time frame:
Day 22 postvaccination
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Titers
Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) After One Dose of Cell Culture-derived or the Egg-derived Influenza Vaccine in Adult and Elderly Subjects
TiterscTIV\cTIV (Adults)cTIV\TIV (Adults)cTIV\cTIV (Elderly)cTIV\TIV (Elderly)TIV\TIV (Adults)TIV\cTIV (Adults)TIV\TIV (Elderly)TIV\cTIV (Elderly)
A/H1N1 strain (Day 1)40 (28 to 58)34 (24 to 48)26 (19 to 35)20 (15 to 27)35 (25 to 51)36 (25 to 51)24 (18 to 32)26 (19 to 35)
A/H1N1 strain (Day 22)87 (65 to 116)83 (62 to 111)57 (43 to 76)61 (46 to 80)72 (53 to 96)104 (78 to 140)61 (46 to 81)80 (61 to 106)
A/H3N2 strain (Day 1)16 (12 to 21)18 (13 to 23)20 (15 to 26)26 (19 to 34)19 (15 to 25)21 (16 to 28)19 (14 to 25)20 (15 to 27)
A/H3N2 strain (Day 22)173 (129 to 233)109 (81 to 146)229 (163 to 321)197 (141 to 277)78 (58 to 105)170 (127 to 229)125 (89 to 175)251 (178 to 352)
B strain (Day 1)30 (22 to 40)26 (19 to 35)36 (27 to 48)48 (36 to 64)37 (27 to 50)35 (26 to 48)26 (19 to 34)37 (27 to 49)
B strain (Day 22)77 (60 to 99)71 (55 to 91)84 (64 to 111)128 (97 to 168)67 (52 to 86)104 (81 to 133)68 (51 to 89)116 (88 to 154)
SecondaryGeometric Mean Ratios (GMRs), After One Dose of the Cell Culture-derived or the Egg-derived Influenza Vaccine in Adult and Elderly Subjects

Immunogenicity was assessed in terms of GMR in adult and elderly subjects following one 0.5ml dose of either the cTIV vaccine or the TIV vaccine, according to the CHMP criteria. The European licensure (CHMP) criteria was met if the mean geometric increase (GMR, day 22/day 1) in HI antibody titer is \>2.5 for adults and \>2.0 for elderly subjects.

Time frame:
Day 22 postvaccination
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio
Geometric Mean Ratios (GMRs), After One Dose of the Cell Culture-derived or the Egg-derived Influenza Vaccine in Adult and Elderly Subjects
RatiocTIV\cTIV (Adults)cTIV\TIV (Adults)cTIV\cTIV (Elderly)cTIV\TIV (Elderly)TIV\TIV (Adults)TIV\cTIV (Adults)TIV\TIV (Elderly)TIV\cTIV (Elderly)
A/H1N1 strain2.14 (1.67 to 2.74)2.46 (1.92 to 3.15)2.2 (1.71 to 2.84)2.98 (2.31 to 3.84)2.02 (1.58 to 2.6)2.91 (2.27 to 3.73)2.54 (1.97 to 3.28)3.11 (2.41 to 4.02)
A/H3N2 strain11 (8.13 to 14)6.17 (4.64 to 8.2)12 (8.49 to 16)7.64 (5.58 to 10)4.09 (3.07 to 5.45)8.05 (6.06 to 11)6.59 (4.81 to 9.04)12 (8.94 to 17)
B strain2.61 (2.07 to 3.29)2.7 (2.14 to 3.41)2.37 (1.86 to 3.03)2.67 (2.09 to 3.42)1.81 (1.43 to 2.29)2.93 (2.32 to 3.7)2.64 (2.07 to 3.38)3.19 (2.5 to 4.07)
SecondaryPercentages of Adult and Elderly Subjects Achieving HI Titers ≥ 40 After One Dose of the Cell Culture-derived or the Egg-derived Influenza Vaccine.

Immunogenicity was assessed in terms of percentages of adult and elderly subjects achieving HI titers≥40,after one dose of either the cTIV vaccine or the TIV vaccine. European (CHMP) criteria is met if the percentage of subjects achieving HI titers ≥ 40 is \> 70% for adults and \>60% for elderly.

Time frame:
Day 22 postvaccination
Reported as:
Number · Percentages of subjects
Percentages of Adult and Elderly Subjects Achieving HI Titers ≥ 40 After One Dose of the Cell Culture-derived or the Egg-derived Influenza Vaccine.
Percentages of subjectscTIV\cTIV (Adults)cTIV\TIV (Adults)cTIV\cTIV (Elderly)cTIV\TIV (Elderly)TIV\TIV (Adults)TIV\cTIV (Adults)TIV\TIV (Elderly)TIV\cTIV (Elderly)
A/H1N1 strain (Day 1)57 (43 to 69)48 (35 to 62)49 (36 to 62)36 (24 to 49)54 (41 to 67)57 (43 to 69)36 (24 to 49)48 (35 to 61)
A/H1N1 strain (Day 22)85 (73 to 93)80 (68 to 89)77 (65 to 87)74 (61 to 84)80 (67 to 89)90 (79 to 96)69 (56 to 80)82 (70 to 91)
A/H3N2 strain (Day 1)25 (15 to 38)27 (16 to 40)30 (19 to 43)39 (27 to 53)32 (21 to 46)33 (22 to 47)26 (16 to 39)34 (23 to 48)
A/H3N2 strain (Day 22)92 (82 to 97)95 (86 to 99)97 (89 to 100)95 (86 to 99)86 (75 to 94)92 (82 to 97)87 (76 to 94)92 (82 to 97)
B strain (Day 1)50 (37 to 63)50 (37 to 63)59 (46 to 71)61 (47 to 73)54 (41 to 67)58 (45 to 71)43 (30 to 56)62 (49 to 74)
B strain (Day 22)80 (68 to 89)90 (79 to 96)84 (72 to 92)92 (82 to 97)85 (73 to 93)87 (75 to 94)84 (72 to 92)90 (80 to 96)
SecondaryPercentages of Adult and Elderly Subjects With Seroconversion or Significant Increase in HI Antibody Titers After One Dose of Cell Culture-derived or the Egg-derived Influenza Vaccine.

Immunogenicity was assessed in terms of percentages of adult and elderly subjects showing seroconversion or significant increase in HI antibody titers after one dose of cell culture-derived or the egg-derived influenza vaccine. Seroconversion or significant increase as per European Licensure (CHMP) criteria is defined as percentage of subjects with a prevaccination HI titer \<10 to a postvaccination titer ≥ 40 for adults and ≥ 30 for elderly. Significant increase is defined as percentage of subjects with a prevaccination HI titer ≥ 10 and a ≥ 4-fold increase in postvaccination HI antibody titer.

Time frame:
Day 22 postvaccination
Reported as:
Number · Percentages of subjects
Percentages of Adult and Elderly Subjects With Seroconversion or Significant Increase in HI Antibody Titers After One Dose of Cell Culture-derived or the Egg-derived Influenza Vaccine.
Percentages of subjectscTIV\cTIV (Adults)cTIV\TIV (Adults)cTIV\cTIV (Elderly)cTIV\TIV (Elderly)TIV\TIV (Adults)TIV\cTIV (Adults)TIV\TIV (Elderly)TIV\cTIV (Elderly)
A/H1N1 strain22 (12 to 34)32 (20 to 45)30 (19 to 43)34 (23 to 48)24 (14 to 37)30 (19 to 43)30 (19 to 43)43 (30 to 56)
A/H3N2 strain82 (70 to 90)85 (73 to 93)84 (72 to 92)80 (68 to 89)61 (47 to 73)80 (68 to 89)77 (65 to 87)82 (70 to 91)
B strain28 (17 to 41)33 (22 to 47)28 (17 to 41)34 (23 to 48)27 (16 to 40)40 (28 to 53)31 (20 to 44)41 (29 to 54)
PrimaryNumber of Subjects Reporting Solicited Adverse Events After One Dose of Cell Culture-derived or the Egg-derived Influenza Vaccine

To assess the safety and tolerability in terms of number of adult and elderly subjects reporting solicited adverse events following one dose of the cTIV or the TIV vaccine .

Time frame:
Day 1 to Day 7 postvaccination
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited Adverse Events After One Dose of Cell Culture-derived or the Egg-derived Influenza Vaccine
ParticipantscTIV\cTIV (Adults)cTIV\TIV (Adults)cTIV\cTIV (Elderly)cTIV\TIV (Elderly)TIV\TIV (Adults)TIV\cTIV (Adults)TIV\TIV (Elderly)TIV\cTIV (Elderly)
Local7873475176844755
Injection site ecchymosis1311121513131811
Injection site erythema3226221940271624
Injection site induration171110720181014
Injection site swelling847512948
Injection site pain5245222146631926
Systemic4146374042463747
Chills748748510
Malaise2018191920272029
Myalgia192013922191021
Arthralgia10714149111115
Headache2421162221271520
Sweat10810111113716
Fatigue1819222423231626
Fever (≥38°C)22203020
Other151171013121012
Stayed at home due to reaction32326345
Analgesic antipyretic medication used1411791110810

Adverse events

Collected over Through out the study period. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Adults (cTIV\cTIV) + (TIV\cTIV)—9/533 (1.7%)188/533 (35.3%)
Adults (cTIV/TIV) + (TIV\TIV)—4/534 (0.7%)172/534 (32.2%)
Elderly (cTIV\cTIV) + (TIV\cTIV)—23/571 (4%)140/571 (24.5%)
Elderly (cTIV\TIV) + (TIV\TIV)—30/597 (5%)148/597 (24.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 68
Most frequent serious events
EventAdults (cTIV\cTIV) + (TIV\cTIV)Adults (cTIV/TIV) + (TIV\TIV)Elderly (cTIV\cTIV) + (TIV\cTIV)Elderly (cTIV\TIV) + (TIV\TIV)
CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders0/5331/5340/5713/597
Acute myocardial infractionCardiac disorders0/5330/5342/5711/597
Adams stokes syndromeCardiac disorders0/5330/5342/5710/597
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders0/5330/5341/5712/597
Myocardial ischaemiaCardiac disorders1/5330/5341/5711/597
Abdominal herniaGastrointestinal disorders1/5330/5340/5710/597
Pancreatitis chronicGastrointestinal disorders1/5330/5340/5710/597
Spilgelian herniaGastrointestinal disorders1/5330/5340/5710/597
Chest painGeneral disorders1/5330/5341/5710/597
Joint contractureMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/5330/5340/5710/597
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAdults (cTIV\cTIV) + (TIV\cTIV)Adults (cTIV/TIV) + (TIV\TIV)Elderly (cTIV\cTIV) + (TIV\cTIV)Elderly (cTIV\TIV) + (TIV\TIV)
Injection site painGeneral disorders115/53391/53448/57140/597
Injection site erythemaGeneral disorders59/53366/53446/57135/597
HeadacheNervous system disorders55/53342/53438/57137/597
MalaiseGeneral disorders48/53343/53449/57139/597
FatigueGeneral disorders41/53343/53449/57141/597
MyalgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders40/53342/53436/57120/597
Injection site indurationGeneral disorders35/53331/53424/57117/597
Injection site haemorrhageGeneral disorders26/53324/53423/57133/597
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders22/53316/53431/57127/597

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Adults (cTIV\cTIV) + (TIV\cTIV)Elderly (cTIV\cTIV) + (TIV\cTIV)Adults (cTIV\TIV) + (TIV\TIV)Elderly (cTIV\TIV) + (TIV\TIV)Total
Mean39.8 ± 12.769.2 ± 5.739.0 ± 12.569.9 ± 5.755.2 ± 17.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Adults (cTIV\cTIV) + (TIV\cTIV)Elderly (cTIV\cTIV) + (TIV\cTIV)Adults (cTIV\TIV) + (TIV\TIV)Elderly (cTIV\TIV) + (TIV\TIV)Total
Female3083083093531278
Male225264225243957
08

Study locations

5 sites
  • Wojewódzki Szpital Dzieci_cy
    Ul. Langiewicza 2, Kielce 25-381, Poland
  • Centrum Bada_ Farmakologii Klinicznej
    Ul. Ujastek 3, Krakow 30-969, Poland
  • NZOZ Jagiello_skie
    Centrum Medyczne Sp. Z O.o., O_. Jagiello_skie 1, Kraków 31-832, Poland
  • NZOZ Praktyka Grupowa Lekarzy Rodzinnych, "Familia" Sp. z o.o.
    Pl. Sikorskiego 6a, Kraków 31-115, Poland
  • Szpital Jana Pawła II, Oddz. Neuroinfekcji
    Ul. Pr_dnicka 80, Kraków 31-202, Poland
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Szymczakiewicz-Multanowska A, Lattanzi M, Izu A, Casula D, Sparacio M, Kovacs C, Groth N. Safety assessment and immunogenicity of a cell-culture-derived influenza vaccine in adults and elderly subjects over three successive influenza seasons. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012 May;8(5):645-52. doi: 10.4161/hv.19493. Epub 2012 May 1. PubMed 22418809 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 14, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00306527
Lead sponsor
Novartis Vaccines
Collaborators
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics S.r.l.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 24, 2006
Start date
Sep 2005
Primary completion
Dec 2005
Completion
Apr 2006
Results posted
Jan 11, 2013
Last update
Aug 14, 2019

Study contacts

Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics
study chair · Novartis Vaccines
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion