CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00301613Updated May 27, 2010

Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) Versus Intravenous CTX Pulses in the Treatment of Adult Severe HSPN

An interventional study of Mycophenolate mofetil in Henoch-Schoenlein Purpura and Nephritis, sponsored by Nanjing University School of Medicine. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-05-27.

Sponsored by Nanjing University School of Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is performed to compare the efficacy, safety, tolerability and relapse of MMF vs CTX in the treatment of severe HSPN

Read the detailed description

Henoch-Schoenlein purpura nephritis (HSPN) with massive proteinuria,renal insufficiency and crescent formation at onset have high risks of progressing to end stage renal failure. Though clinical studies have shown that steroids in combination with cyclophosphamide could reduce proteinuria and preserve renal function, this protocol is associated with many side effects, and is not effective in some patients.

Recent studies have shown that mycophenolic acid(MPA), the active metabolite of mycophenolate mofetil(MMF),could inhibit multifarious effects on endothelial cells, including adhesion molecular expression, neutrophil attachment,IL-6 secretion, and the process of angiogenesis, which contribute to the efficacy of MMF in the treatment of vasculitis. Clinical studies also showed that MMF was effective in the treatment of lupus nephritis with vasculitic lesions. These findings suggest that MMF might be effective in the treatment of severe HSPN, which is a kind of vasculitic lesion. This prospective open-labeled clinical trial study investigates the efficiency of MMF in the treatment of severe HSPN compared with pulse intravenous cyclophosphamide. After 12 months of treatment, we will assess the efficacy, safety, tolerability and relapse of MMF compared with cyclophosphamide in the treatment of severe HSPN.

02

Conditions studied

  • Henoch-Schoenlein Purpura
  • Nephritis

Keywords

  • Henoch-Schonlein purpura nephritis Mycophenolate mofetil
  • Cyclophosphamide
  • treatment
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • 16-50 years
  • Biopsy proved HSP
  • Proteinuria ≥ 3.0 g/24hr
  • Scr \< 5.0 mg/dl

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cytotoxic drug treatment such as CTX, CsA, MMF for morn than 1 month-3 months prior to enrolled
  • Pregnancy
  • Active/serious infections
  • Previous diagnosed diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Mycophenolate mofetil

    Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil

Interventions

  • DrugMycophenolate mofetil

    MMF,1.0g/d

    Also known as: Mycophenolate mofetil,cellcept

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To compare the efficacy,safety, tolerability and relapse of MMF vs CTX in the treatment of severe HSPN

    Time frame: 12 months

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Research Institute of Nephrology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine
    Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, China
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00301613
Lead sponsor
Nanjing University School of Medicine
First posted
Mar 13, 2006
Start date
Jan 2003
Primary completion
May 2005
Completion
Jan 2006
Last update
May 27, 2010

Study contacts

Zhi-Hong Liu, M.D.
study chair · Research Institute of Nephrology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion