CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00298727Updated May 4, 2011

The Effect and Mediators of Two Knowledge Translation Strategies

A Phase 3 interventional study of SHIPS and ePBL in Knowledge Transfer and Clinical Decision-making, sponsored by McMaster University. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-05-04.

Sponsored by McMaster University · Phase 3 and Interventional

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
131
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Purpose: This study will compare the effectiveness and mediators of two different knowledge transfer (KT) interventions in terms of their impact on changing knowledge and behavior (utilization and clinical reasoning) related to health outcome measures.

Read the detailed description

Interventions: Two different KT interventions with the same curriculum will be evaluated: 1. Stakeholder-Hosted Interactive Problem-Based Seminar (SHIPS), and 2. Online Problem-Based course (ePBL). SHIPs will consist of face-to-face PBL (Problem-based Learning) (2½ days) with outcome measure developers as facilitators, using 6 problems generated in consultation with participants. The ePBL will consist of a 6-week web-based course with 6 generic problems developed by content experts.

Outcome Measures: Baseline predictors including demographics, knowledge, attitudes/barriers regarding outcome measures and Readiness to Change will be assessed by self-report. Immediately post-intervention and 6 months later these will be re-administered. Primary qualitative and quantitative evaluations will be conducted 6-months post-intervention to assess the relative effectiveness of KT interventions and to identify elements that contribute to changing clinical behavior. Chart audits will determine the utilization of outcome measures (counts). Incorporation of outcome measures into clinical reasoning will be assessed using an innovative technique: chart-stimulated recall.

The Study Sample: Physical and Occupational Therapists (n=144; 80% power to detect an effect size of 0.5; alpha=0.05) will be recruited in partnership with the national professional associations.

Methods: SHIPS will be conducted in three urban centers in Canada. Participants will be block allocated by a minimization procedure to either of the two interventions to minimize any prognostic differences. Trained evaluators at each site will conduct chart audits and chart-stimulated recall. Trained interviewers will conduct semi-structured interviews focused on identifying critical elements in KT and implementing practice changes. Interviews will be transcribed verbatim.

Analyses: Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with baseline scores as a covariate, will be used to compare chart-stimulated recall scores at 6-months post-intervention. Secondary analyses will also use ANCOVA with the remaining potential predictors. Qualitative content analysis will be conducted iteratively until saturation is achieved.

Knowledge Impact and Transfer: A strategy for optimal transfer of health outcome measures into practice will be developed and shared with multiple disciplines involved in primary and specialty management of musculoskeletal and childhood disability. In addition, we will work with national professional organizations and Ministries of Health to use the knowledge from this study to support national initiatives on implementation and to assist with best KT practices in health service education.

02

Conditions studied

  • Knowledge Transfer
  • Clinical Decision-making

Keywords

  • Knowledge transfer
  • Clinical decision-making
  • Outcome measures
03

In context

Lead sponsor

McMaster University is the lead sponsor of 720 studies on the registry; 124 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (33%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • A valid license to practice physical or occupational therapy.
  • Ability to communicate in English will be required.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Volunteers will be required to complete a knowledge pre-test in the format of a multiple-choice questionnaire. Those who are already knowledgeable, as determined by a score of 75% or greater, will be excluded to avoid ceiling effects.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
131 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    1

    SHIPS: Face-to-Face Workshop

    Behavioral: SHIPS

  • Active comparator
    2

    ePBL: Online Problem-Based Course

    Behavioral: ePBL

Interventions

  • BehavioralSHIPS

    Stakeholder-Hosted Interactive Problem-based Seminars

    Also known as: Face-to-Face workshop

  • BehavioralePBL

    Online Problem-Based Course

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Chart Audit Form (Utilization)

    Time frame: Up to 6 months post-intervention

  2. Chart Stimulated Recall Data Collection Form

    Time frame: Up to 6 months post-intervention

  3. Self-Efficacy Questionnaire

    Time frame: Up to 6 months post-intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Readiness to Change Clinical Practice Scale

    Time frame: Up to 6 months post-intervention

  2. Knowledge Test

    Time frame: Up to 6 months post-intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • McMaster University
    Hamilton, Ontario L8S 1C7, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • MacDermid JC, Solomon P, Law M, Russell D, Stratford P. Defining the effect and mediators of two knowledge translation strategies designed to alter knowledge, intent and clinical utilization of rehabilitation outcome measures: a study protocol [NCT00298727]. Implement Sci. 2006 Jul 4;1:14. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-14. PubMed 16820055 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 4, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00298727
Lead sponsor
McMaster University
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
First posted
Mar 3, 2006
Start date
Jan 2007
Primary completion
Dec 2010
Completion
Dec 2010
Last update
May 4, 2011

Study contacts

Joy C MacDermid, PhD
principal investigator · McMaster University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion