CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00293969Updated Feb 20, 2006

A Trial Comparing Different Dosing Regimens of Morphine in Patients With Moderate to Severe Pain

An interventional study of Morphine 0.1mg/kg versus morphine 0.15 mg/kg in Pain, sponsored by Montefiore Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2006-02-20.

Sponsored by Montefiore Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
280
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

RESEARCH QUESTION: In adult ED patients in whom the attending ED physician has decided to administer intravenous opiates, what is the difference in pain relief at 60 minutes in patients who are randomized to receive either weight-based IV morphine 0.1mg/kg or weight-based IV morphine 0.15 mg/kg?

HYPOTHESIS: In adult ED patients who receive IV morphine at a dose of 0.15/mg, more patients will report moderate to complete pain relief than patients receiving a dose of 0.1 mg/kg.

SIGNIFICANCE: If it is shown that morphine 0.15 mg/kg gives better pain relief to patients with comparable side effects when compared with morphine at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg, then we may be able to provide evidence to suggest that the higher dose should be used for adult ED patients under the age of 66 presenting with acute pain.

Read the detailed description

RESEARCH QUESTION: In adult ED patients in whom the attending ED physician has decided to administer intravenous opiates, what is the between-group difference in before-after improvement in pain relief at 60 minutes in patients who are randomized to receive either weight-based IV morphine 0.1mg/kg or weight-based IV morphine 0.15 mg/kg?

HYPOTHESIS: In adult ED patients who receive IV morphine at a dose of 0.15/mg, more patients will report moderate to complete pain relief than patients receiving a dose of 0.1 mg/kg.

SIGNIFICANCE: If it is shown that morphine 0.15 mg/kg gives better pain relief to patients with comparable side effects when compared with morphine at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg, then we may be able to provide evidence to suggest that the higher dose should be used for adult ED patients under the age of 66 presenting with acute pain.

METHODS/DESIGN: Prospective, double blind, randomized clinical trial. Adult ED patients between the ages of 18 and 65 years of age in whom the attending ED physician has decided to administer parenteral opiates, will be randomized to receive either 0.1 mg/kg IV morphine (maximum dose of 10 mg) or 0.15mg/kg IV morphine (maximum dose of 15 mg). An on-line random plan generator (http://www.randomization.com) will be used to generate an allocation schedule. The allocation schedule will be fully documented with the reference citation of the pseudo-random number generator, the seed used to start the generation process, the number of treatments (2), the allocation ratio (1:1), the size and number of blocks, and a copy of the assignment list. The allocation schedule will be given to the Montefiore Department of Pharmacy where it will be used to determine the content of consecutively numbered vials with either the study doses of morphine. The Pharmacy Department will prepare and handle the vials in accordance with known stability data and labeled with expiration dates. They will provide the study with labeled packages containing the numbered vial, a label with the vial number to be attached to the patient's data collection instrument, an opaque envelope with the assignment group identified (to be used in the event of a clinical emergency that requires immediate determination of what the patient received) and a weight based dosing schedule for morphine. All patients will receive a bolus of morphine 0.1mg/kg at time 0. At 30 minutes, patients will receive the study drug which will contain either an additional 0.05mg/kg of morphine or placebo. After the initial morphine bolus and study drug, patients will have received either morphine 0.1 mg/kg (maximum of 10 mg) or 0.15 mg/kg (maximum of 15mg).

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain

Keywords

  • Pain
  • Morphine
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Montefiore Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 402 studies on the registry; 70 are open to participants now.

Of its 81 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 73 (90%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients 21 to 65 years of age presenting to the ED with pain of less than or equal to 7 days duration and deemed by the ED attending to require opioid analgesia are eligible for inclusion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent, methadone use, use of other opioids or tramadol within 7 days, prior adverse reaction to morphine, chronic pain syndrome, alcohol intoxication, pregnancy or breast-feeding, systolic blood pressure \<90 mm Hg, use of MAO inhibitors, and weight greater than 100 kg.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double
Enrollment
280 participants

Interventions

  • DrugMorphine 0.1mg/kg versus morphine 0.15 mg/kg
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The between-group difference in mean before-after difference in pain score at baseline and 60 minutes in patients randomized to receive either 0.10 mg/kg or 0.15 mg/kg morphine

Secondary outcomes

  1. Between-group comparison of mean change in pain score from 30 min to 60 min

  2. Comparison of between-group differences in pain relief scores

  3. Patient satisfaction score

  4. Adverse events at 30 and 60 minutes

  5. Number of additional boluses of analgesics needed within 60 minutes for the two groups.

  6. NRS pain score percent reduction at 60 min calculated as NRS pain score reduction from baseline to 60 min divided by baseline NRS score

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Montefiore Medical Center Emergency Department
    Bronx, New York 10467, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 20, 2006, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00293969
Lead sponsor
Montefiore Medical Center
First posted
Feb 20, 2006
Start date
Mar 2005
Completion
Jan 2006
Last update
Feb 20, 2006

Study contacts

Adrienne J. Birnbaum, MD
principal investigator · Albert Einstein College of Medicine
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2006. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion