CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00287573TAXUS V ISRUpdated Aug 6, 2010

Randomized Trial Evaluating Slow-Release Formulation TAXUS Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent in the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of TAXUS Express2 and Brachytherapy (beta source) in Coronary Restenosis, sponsored by Boston Scientific Corporation. Completed at 42 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-08-06.

Sponsored by Boston Scientific Corporation · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
488
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the TAXUS Express2 Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System as compared to brachytherapy in patients experiencing in-stent restenosis.

Read the detailed description

Percutaneous approaches to in-stent restenosis (ISR) have included balloon angioplasty alone, rotational atherectomy, cutting balloon angioplasty, directional coronary atherectomy, excimer laser angioplasty, placement of a second stent or any combination thereof, and intra-coronary brachytherapy. Of these, only brachytherapy has been shown to reduce recurrent restenosis after PCI for ISR, - and is now considered the standard of care. Logistical considerations in establishing and maintaining a radiation program have limited the widespread availability of this modality. These considerations include the need for involvement of radiation oncologists, physicists, and safety officers; nuclear licensing requirements; need for increased shielding and safety training; equipment and procedural complexities; as well as increased procedural time and costs. Furthermore, recurrent ISR after brachytherapy may still occur. Stent based drug delivery for the treatment of ISR holds promise as a much simpler, safer and potentially more effective alternative to brachytherapy.

This is a prospective, randomized (1:1), open-label, multicenter, safety and efficacy trial for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. The primary objective is to demonstrate a superior or non-inferior 9-month target vessel revascularization (TVR) rate for TAXUS-SR stent compared to intra-coronary brachytherapy (beta source).

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Restenosis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Coronary Restenosis

97 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Restenosis; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 488 is above the median of 240 across 59 interventional studies indexed under Coronary Restenosis.

Browse Coronary Restenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Boston Scientific Corporation is the lead sponsor of 517 studies on the registry; 38 are open to participants now.

Of its 64 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 56 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Cumulative target lesion length is \</= 46 mm (visual estimate).
  • Reference vessel diameter (RVD) is >/= 2.5 and \</= 3.75 mm (visual estimate)
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is >/= 25%

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any previous or planned treatment with a non-study anti-restenotic drug-coated or drug-eluting coronary stent in the target vessel. (Note:previous or planned treatment with heparin or phosphorylcholine coated stents is acceptable, as long as, the procedure with the non-study stent meets the protocol defined criteria for non-target lesion interventions.)
  • Previous or planned treatment with intra-coronary brachytherapy (gamma or beta source) in the target vessel
  • Previous external radiotherapy to the heart or target vessel area
  • Known genetic radiation sensitivity disorders (i.e. ataxia-telangiectasia, etc.)
  • Side branch of the target lesion includes ostial narrowing >/= 50% diameter stenosis (DS) and is >/= 2.0 mm diameter
  • Target lesion has been previously treated for ISR with the placement of a second stent(s), which covers >/= 50% of the original stent length (a true "stent sandwich")
  • Target vessel is pre-treated with an unapproved device, directional or rotational coronary atherectomy, laser, or transluminal extraction catheter immediately prior to delivery of randomized treatment (stent placement or intra-coronary brachytherapy)
  • Recent myocardial infarction (MI) (symptom onset \</= 72 hours prior to randomization)
  • CK-MB >2x the local laboratory's upper limit of normal (ULN) (refers to a measured value on the day of the index procedure as drawn per protocol)
  • Anticipated treatment with warfarin during any period in the 6 months post index procedure
  • Anticipated treatment with paclitaxel, oral rapamycin or colchicine during any period in the 9 months post index procedure
  • Planned use of both the study stent and a non-study stent (i.e., commercial stent) in the treatment of the target lesion
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
488 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm 1

    Device: TAXUS Express2

  • Active comparator
    Arm 2

    Procedure: Brachytherapy (beta source)

Interventions

  • DeviceTAXUS Express2

    Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System

  • ProcedureBrachytherapy (beta source)

    Brachytherapy (beta source)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of Target Vessel Revascularization

    Time frame: 9 Months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of composite major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and the individual components of MACE

    Time frame: assessed at discharge, 1, 4 and 9 months post index procedure and annually for 5 years

  2. Stent thrombosis rate

    Time frame: 5 Years

  3. Target Vessel Failure (TVF, defined as any ischemia-driven revascularization of the target vessel, MI related to the target vessel, or death related to the target vessel).

    Time frame: 5 Years

  4. Clinical procedural success and technical success

    Time frame: 5 Years

  5. Binary restenosis rate

    Time frame: 5 years

  6. Evaluate outcomes and treatment of recurrent restenosis in the TAXUS stent arm

    Time frame: 5 Years

  7. Absolute lesion length

    Time frame: 9 Months

  8. Reference Vessel Diameter (RVD)

    Time frame: 9 Months

  9. Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD)

    Time frame: 9 Months

  10. Percent diameter stenosis (% DS)

    Time frame: 9 Months

  11. Acute gain

    Time frame: 9 Months

  12. Late loss

    Time frame: 9 Months

  13. Loss index

    Time frame: 9 Months

  14. Patterns of recurrent restenosis, including edge effect

    Time frame: 9 Months

  15. Coronary aneurysm

    Time frame: 9 Months

  16. Identification of potential safety issues.

    Time frame: 9 Months

  17. Change in neointimal volume from post procedure to follow-up

    Time frame: 9 Months

  18. Change in MLD within the stent or area of brachytherapy

    Time frame: 9 Months

  19. Minimum lumen area (MLA) within the stent or area of brachytherapy

    Time frame: 9 Months

  20. Lumen, plaque and vessel measurements at the treatment edges (outside of the stent or area of brachytherapy)

    Time frame: 9 Months

07

Study locations

42 sites
  • Baptist Medical Center Princeton
    Birmingham, Alabama 35211, United States
  • Scripps Green Hospital
    LaJolla, California 92037, United States
  • Mercy General Hospital
    Sacramento, California 95819, United States
  • Stanford Medical Center
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
  • Aurora Denver Cardiology
    Aurora, Colorado 80012, United States
  • Washington Hospital Center
    Washington, District of Columbia 20010, United States
  • Florida Hospital
    Orlando, Florida 32803, United States
  • Piedmont Hospital
    Atlanta, Georgia 30309, United States
  • Ochsner Clinic Foundation
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70121, United States
  • Maine Medical Center
    Portland, Maine 04102, United States
  • Washington Adventist Hospital
    Takoma Park, Maryland 20912-6367, United States
  • Tufts Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02111, United States
  • Lahey Clinic Hospital
    Burlington, Massachusetts 01805, United States
  • University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center
    Worcester, Massachusetts 01655, United States
  • Spectrum Health Hospitals
    Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503, United States
  • Cardiac & Vascular Research Center of Northern Michigan
    Petoskey, Michigan 49770, United States
  • Abbott Northwestern Hospital
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55407-1195, United States
  • Saint Luke's Hospital
    Kansas City, Missouri 64111, United States
  • Barnes Jewish Hospital
    St. Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • Nebraska Heart Institute
    Lincoln, Nebraska 68526, United States
  • Albany Medical Center/Capital Cardiovascular Associates
    Albany, New York 12208, United States
  • Buffalo General Hospital
    Buffalo, New York 14215, United States
  • Columbia University Medical Center
    New York, New York 10021, United States
  • Lenox Hill Hospital
    New York, New York 10021, United States
  • Mid-Carolina Cardiology Research Division/Presbyterian Hospital
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28204, United States
  • LeBauer Cardiovascular Research Foundation
    Greensboro, North Carolina 27401, United States
  • Forsyth Medical Center
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States
  • The Lindner Clinical Trial Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, United States
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • North Ohio Research, Ltd
    Elyria, Ohio 44035, United States
  • Oklahoma Cardiovascular Research Group
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73120, United States
  • St. Mary's Medical Center
    Langhorne, Pennsylvania 19047, United States
  • The Miriam Hospital
    Providence, Rhode Island 02906, United States
  • South Carolina Heart Center
    Columbia, South Carolina 29204, United States
  • St. Thomas Hospital
    Nashville, Tennessee 37205, United States
  • South Austin Hospital/Capital Cardiovascular Specialists
    Austin, Texas 78745, United States
  • The Methodist Hospital Research Institute in Cardiovascular Interventions
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • University of Virginia
    Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, United States
  • Swedish Medical Center
    Seattle, Washington 98104, United States
  • Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre
    Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
  • Toronto General Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Stone GW, Ellis SG, O'Shaughnessy CD, Martin SL, Satler L, McGarry T, Turco MA, Kereiakes DJ, Kelley L, Popma JJ, Russell ME; TAXUS V ISR Investigators. Paclitaxel-eluting stents vs vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis within bare-metal stents: the TAXUS V ISR randomized trial. JAMA. 2006 Mar 15;295(11):1253-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.11.1253. Epub 2006 Mar 12. PubMed 16531618 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 6, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00287573
Lead sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation
First posted
Feb 7, 2006
Start date
Jun 2003
Primary completion
Dec 2004
Completion
Jan 2010
Last update
Aug 6, 2010

Study contacts

Gregg W. Stone, MD
principal investigator · Columbia University
Stephen G. Ellis, MD
principal investigator · The Cleveland Clinic
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion