ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT00286026Updated Apr 16, 2012

Azithromycin in Control of Trachoma II

A Phase 4 interventional study of Azithromycin in Trachoma, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-04-16.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
Prevalence of infection for screened population too low (\<7%) to enroll anyone.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Non-randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Trachoma is the world's leading cause of preventable blindness. This disease, caused by Chlamydia trachomatis, is endemic in many parts of the developing world. In 1990s we evaluated the use of community-wide treatment with oral azithromycin in a project called Azithromycin in Control of Trachoma (ACT). This approach resulted in clinical improvement and dramatic reduction in prevalence of chlamydial infection through a 1-year follow-up. We enrolled the ACT villages, as well as an additional village that had not had any prior treatments, in our ACT II (2005) study and performed clinical surveys to assess trachoma activity testing conjunctival swabs for the presence of C. trachomatis by nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). Thus, we hoped to determine the long-term (10 year) effects of azithromycin treatment.

We have completed the census and clinical survey of the initial three villages. Mass treatment with azithromycin would not be justified with such low rates (1.8 - 4%) of ocular chlamydial infection. We have treated only those living in households with one or more cases of chlamydial infection and we will not follow up on these individually treated families.

In order to achieve the goals of our study, we now propose to identify other more remote villages with trachoma infection rates of 20% or more to evaluate the effect of community-wide treatment with single dose of oral azithromycin. If one or more of these villages (dependent upon population) has trachoma rates of 20% or more they will be invited to participate in the azithromycin treatment. In one set of subjects (1 or 2 villages, dependent upon population and infection rate) we will perform treatment, and follow them up at 2-, 12-, and 24-months post-treatment to ascertain infection rates. In a second set of subjects (1 or 2 villages, dependent upon population and infection rate) we will perform treatment, then perform re-treatment at 30-days post initial treatment, and follow them up at 2-, 12-, and 24-months post-treatment to ascertain infection rates. This should help us determine the need for/and the best time for re-treatment to eliminate blinding trachoma, as some recent studies suggest there is a 2-4% failure rate in the initial treatment. In sum, this study should provide a rational approach to use of community-wide azithromycin treatment to eliminate blinding trachoma as a public health problem

Read the detailed description

This is operational research aimed at better defining the use of oral azithromycin as part of the SAFE strategy to eliminate blinding trachoma.

  1. Before the examinations, we will do a census and a sketch map of houses in each village. Particular emphasis will be placed on identifying all the children between 1 and 6 years of age. These children are the chief reservoir of infection, and would have been too young (or unborn) at the ACT study treatment, so it is of particular interest to determine their disease and infection status.
  2. Egyptian ophthalmologists will examine the eyelids, conjunctiva and cornea using magnifying loupes and a hand held light, with grading following the ACT protocol which contains categories referable to the W.H.O. detailed grading scheme. The clinical findings will be recorded on a standardized form.
  3. Egyptian health aides will photograph the inside of the right upper eyelid of all subjects. The photographs of the subjects at the initial visit and all subsequent examinations will be examined to confirm the consistency of clinical findings over the period of the study.
  4. To test for chlamydial infection, a single fiber-tipped swab will be stroked gently over the conjunctiva of the right eye by an Egyptian ophthalmologist. These swabs will be placed in special tubes and tested for Chlamydia trachomatis by a nucleic acid amplification assay. [APTIMA® Gen-Probe Inc. (San Diego, CA.)] The APTIMA® assay detects DNA via r-RNA by a process called transcription mediated amplification. Laboratory testing will be performed at the Chlamydia Research Laboratory at University of California, San Francisco.
  5. After the results are obtained from the nucleic acid amplification testing performed at the laboratory in San Francisco, treatment for trachoma will be done with a single-dose of oral azithromycin (20 mg/kg body weight in children, 1.0 gm adults). The azithromycin will be donated by Pfizer International. Young children will be weighed to determine the dose of azithromycin and the doses administered by a health aide under direct supervision of an Egyptian physician (Dr. Mahfouz). One set of subjects (1 or 2 villages depending upon population size, in order to generate meaningful numbers) will receive an initial treatment of 1.0 gm azithromycin; while the second set of subjects will receive an initial treatment of 1.0 gm azithromycin, followed by a second dose of 1.0 gm azithromycin at 30 days post treatment.

    1. If the prevalence of clinical trachoma is over 20% in children 10 and under, everyone in the village will be treated with oral azithromycin.

      After initial azithromycin treatment, follow-up examinations and specimen collection will be done 2, 12, and 24 months post-treatment for trachoma and chlamydial infection.

    2. If the prevalence is 10% to 20%, all children 10 and under, and the families of those children with active trachoma, will be treated.

      After initial azithromycin treatment, follow-up examinations and specimen collection will be done 2, 12, and 24 months post-treatment for trachoma and chlamydial infection.

    3. If the prevalence is less than 10%, only children with active disease and their families will receive treatment. There will be no follow-up examinations.

    Adults and older children will be told that azithromycin can cause nausea, vomiting, or loose stools or vomiting in some children and adults, and can occur in up to 5% (1 person in 20) of those treated.

    It should be noted that in our previous ACT study, more than 8,000 people received azithromycin with no complaints beyond minor gastro-intestinal upset.

  6. All positive specimens will have the major outer membrane gene amplified and sequenced. The genovars will be mapped for location within villages and families and then their distribution will be followed over time, after treatment to provide a better understanding of the epidemiology of the infection. Results of the study will be used as data input for the generation of mathematical models to predict whether community-wide retreatment (or alternate strategies) will be needed, and the optimal timing for such retreatment.
02

Conditions studied

  • Trachoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Chlamydia trachomatis
03

In context

Trachoma

39 studies on the registry are indexed under Trachoma; 3 are open to participants now.

Browse Trachoma studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,169 studies on the registry; 372 are open to participants now.

Of its 267 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 202 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Person resides within a selected rural village in a trachoma-endemic area of Egypt.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Person does not reside in one of the three rural villages being studied.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm 1

    Subjects residing in villages assigned to treatment arm 1 will receive a clinical evaluation for trachoma and provide a swab specimen of conjunctivae of the R eye at enrollment (Day 0); will be treated with Azithromycin at Day 30; will be re-screened (clinical evaluation and swab specimen of R eye collected) at Day 60; and again at Day 360.

    Drug: Azithromycin

  • Experimental
    Arm 2

    Subjects residing in villages assigned to treatment arm 2 will receive a clinical evaluation for trachoma and provide a swab specimen of conjunctivae of the R eye at enrollment (Day 0), as well as receive an initial treatment with Azithromycin; will receive a second dose of Azithromycin at Day 30; will be re-screened (clinical evaluation and swab specimen of R eye collected) at Day 60; and again at Day 360.

    Drug: Azithromycin

Interventions

  • 1 gm Azithromycin orally, provided as four 250 mg tablets for adults; pediatric suspension will be provided to children \> 1 year old (20 mg/kg body weight) to a maximal dose of 500 mg. One dose vs 2 doses given 30 days apart.

    Also known as: Zithromax, Zmax

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Infection with Chlamydia trachomatis diagnosed by use of NAAT

    Time frame: One-year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of California, San Francisco
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mabey D, Fraser-Hurt N. Antibiotics for trachoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(1):CD001860. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001860. PubMed 11869610 ↗
  • Burton MJ, Frick KD, Bailey RL, Bowman RJ. Azithromycin for the treatment and control of trachoma. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2002 Feb;3(2):113-20. doi: 10.1517/14656566.3.2.113. PubMed 11829725 ↗
  • Dawson CR, Schachter J. Should trachoma be treated with antibiotics? Lancet. 2002 Jan 19;359(9302):184-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07463-9. No abstract available. PubMed 11812548 ↗
  • Bain DL, Lietman T, Rasmussen S, Kalman S, Fan J, Lammel C, Zhang JZ, Dawson CR, Schachter J, Stephens RS. Chlamydial genovar distribution after community wide antibiotic treatment. J Infect Dis. 2001 Dec 15;184(12):1581-8. doi: 10.1086/324661. Epub 2001 Dec 3. PubMed 11740734 ↗
  • Pechere JC. New perspectives on macrolide antibiotics. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2001;18 Suppl 1:S93-7. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(01)00393-4. PubMed 11574203 ↗
  • Fraser-Hurt N, Bailey RL, Cousens S, Mabey D, Faal H, Mabey DC. Efficacy of oral azithromycin versus topical tetracycline in mass treatment of endemic trachoma. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(7):632-40. PubMed 11477966 ↗
  • Tabbara KF. Trachoma: a review. J Chemother. 2001 Apr;13 Suppl 1:18-22. doi: 10.1080/1120009x.2001.11782323. PubMed 11434524 ↗
  • Treadway G. Azithromycin: a new 15-membered macrolide. Jpn J Antibiot. 2001 Feb;54 Suppl A:70-6. PubMed 11296412 ↗
  • Bailey R, Lietman T. The SAFE strategy for the elimination of trachoma by 2020: will it work? Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):233-6. Epub 2003 Jul 7. PubMed 11285668 ↗
  • Frick KD, Lietman TM, Holm SO, Jha HC, Chaudhary JS, Bhatta RC. Cost-effectiveness of trachoma control measures: comparing targeted household treatment and mass treatment of children. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):201-7. Epub 2003 Jul 7. PubMed 11285663 ↗
  • Holm SO, Jha HC, Bhatta RC, Chaudhary JS, Thapa BB, Davis D, Pokhrel RP, Yinghui M, Zegans M, Schachter J, Frick KD, Tapert L, Lietman TM. Comparison of two azithromycin distribution strategies for controlling trachoma in Nepal. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):194-200. Epub 2003 Jul 7. PubMed 11285662 ↗
  • Lietman T, Fry A. Can we eliminate trachoma? Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Apr;85(4):385-7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.4.385. No abstract available. PubMed 11264123 ↗
  • Duran JM, Amsden GW. Azithromycin: indications for the future? Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2000 Mar;1(3):489-505. doi: 10.1517/14656566.1.3.489. PubMed 11249533 ↗
  • Solomon AW, Akudibillah J, Abugri P, Hagan M, Foster A, Bailey RL, Mabey DC. Pilot study of the use of community volunteers to distribute azithromycin for trachoma control in Ghana. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(1):8-14. Epub 2003 Nov 5. PubMed 11217675 ↗
  • West S. The red eye. N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 23;343(21):1577. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200011233432117. No abstract available. PubMed 11184764 ↗
  • Bowman RJ, Sillah A, Van Dehn C, Goode VM, Muqit MM, Johnson GJ, Milligan P, Rowley J, Faal H, Bailey RL. Operational comparison of single-dose azithromycin and topical tetracycline for trachoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Dec;41(13):4074-9. Erratum In: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Jul;48(7):2966. Muquit, M [corrected to Muqit, M M]. PubMed 11095598 ↗
  • Guzey M, Aslan G, Ozardali I, Basar E, Satici A, Karadede S. Three-day course of oral azithromycin vs topical oxytetracycline/polymyxin in treatment of active endemic trachoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2000 Jul-Aug;44(4):387-91. doi: 10.1016/s0021-5155(00)00167-2. PubMed 10974295 ↗
  • Laming AC, Currie BJ, DiFrancesco M, Taylor HR, Mathews JD. A targeted, single-dose azithromycin strategy for trachoma. Med J Aust. 2000 Feb 21;172(4):163-6. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2000.tb125541.x. PubMed 10772587 ↗
  • Chern KC, Shrestha SK, Cevallos V, Dhami HL, Tiwari P, Chern L, Whitcher JP, Lietman TM. Alterations in the conjunctival bacterial flora following a single dose of azithromycin in a trachoma endemic area. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 Dec;83(12):1332-5. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.12.1332. PubMed 10574809 ↗
  • Whitty CJ, Glasgow KW, Sadiq ST, Mabey DC, Bailey R. Impact of community-based mass treatment for trachoma with oral azithromycin on general morbidity in Gambian children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999 Nov;18(11):955-8. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199911000-00003. PubMed 10571428 ↗
  • Mabey D, Bailey R. Eradication of trachoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 Nov;83(11):1261-3. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.11.1261. No abstract available. PubMed 10535853 ↗
  • Dawson CR. Acceptance of Medaille d'Or du Trachome by Dr. Chandler R. Dawson M. D. Kyoto, 16 May 1978. Rev Int Trach Pathol Ocul Trop Subtrop. 1978;55(3-4):21-2, 30-1. No abstract available. English, French. PubMed 33432 ↗
  • Schachter J, West SK, Mabey D, Dawson CR, Bobo L, Bailey R, Vitale S, Quinn TC, Sheta A, Sallam S, Mkocha H, Mabey D, Faal H. Azithromycin in control of trachoma. Lancet. 1999 Aug 21;354(9179):630-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)12387-5. PubMed 10466664 ↗
  • Chidambaram JD, Alemayehu W, Melese M, Lakew T, Yi E, House J, Cevallos V, Zhou Z, Maxey K, Lee DC, Shapiro BL, Srinivasan M, Porco T, Whitcher JP, Gaynor BD, Lietman TM. Effect of a single mass antibiotic distribution on the prevalence of infectious trachoma. JAMA. 2006 Mar 8;295(10):1142-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.10.1142. PubMed 16522834 ↗
  • West SK, Munoz B, Mkocha H, Holland MJ, Aguirre A, Solomon AW, Foster A, Bailey RL, Mabey DC. Infection with Chlamydia trachomatis after mass treatment of a trachoma hyperendemic community in Tanzania: a longitudinal study. Lancet. 2005 Oct 8;366(9493):1296-300. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67529-0. PubMed 16214600 ↗
  • Mabey D, Fraser-Hurt N, Powell C. Antibiotics for trachoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD001860. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001860.pub2. PubMed 15846624 ↗
  • Solomon AW, Holland MJ, Alexander ND, Massae PA, Aguirre A, Natividad-Sancho A, Molina S, Safari S, Shao JF, Courtright P, Peeling RW, West SK, Bailey RL, Foster A, Mabey DC. Mass treatment with single-dose azithromycin for trachoma. N Engl J Med. 2004 Nov 4;351(19):1962-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040979. PubMed 15525721 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jun 2005, a primary completion of Aug 2007 and a completion of Aug 2009. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 31, 2006
First posted
Feb 2, 2006
Start
Jun 2005
Primary completionActual
Aug 2007
CompletionActual
Aug 2009
Last update
Apr 16, 2012
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 16, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00286026
Responsible party
Julius Schachter (Professor of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 2, 2006
Start date
Jun 2005
Primary completion
Aug 2007
Completion
Aug 2009
Last update
Apr 16, 2012

Study contacts

Julius Schachter, PhD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco
Chandler R Dawson, MD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Apr 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Azithromycin

Start the discussion