A Phase 2/3 interventional study of antenatal hypnosis + audio compact disc on hypnosis and Audio compact disc on hypnosis in Pregnancy and Labor, sponsored by Women's and Children's Hospital, Australia. Completed at 1 site in Australia. Open to female participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-06-29.
Sponsored by Women's and Children's Hospital, Australia · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Prevention
Antenatal hypnosis is associated with a reduced need for pharmacological interventions during childbirth. This trial seeks to determine the efficacy or otherwise of antenatal group hypnosis preparation for childbirth in late pregnancy.
Background: Although medical interventions play an important role in preserving lives and maternal comfort they have become increasingly routine in normal childbirth. This may increase the risk of associated complications and a less satisfactory birth experience. Antenatal hypnosis is associated with a reduced need for pharmacological interventions during childbirth. This trial seeks to determine the efficacy or otherwise of antenatal group hypnosis preparation for childbirth in late pregnancy.
Methods / Design: A single centre, randomised controlled trial using a 3 arm parallel group design in the largest tertiary maternity unit in South Australia. Group 1 participants receive antenatal hypnosis training in preparation for childbirth administered by a qualified hypnotherapist with the use of an audio compact disc on hypnosis for re-enforcement; Group 2 consists of antenatal hypnosis training in preparation for childbirth using an audio compact disc on hypnosis administered by a nurse with no training in hypnotherapy; Group 3 participants continue with their usual preparation for childbirth with no additional intervention. Women > 34 \< 39 weeks gestation, with a singleton, viable fetus, vertex presentation, who are not in active labour or planning a vaginal birth are eligible to participate. Allocation concealment is achieved using telephone randomisation. Participants assigned to hypnosis groups are trained as near as possible to 37 weeks gestation. Group allocations are concealed from treating obstetricians, anaesthetists, midwives and those personnel collecting and analysing data. Our sample size of 135 women / group gives the study 80% power to detect a clinically relevant fall of 20% in the number of women requiring pharmacological analgesia - the primary endpoint. We estimate that approximately 5-10% of women will deliver prior to receiving their allocated intervention. We plan to recruit 150 women / group and perform interim analyses when 150 and 300 participants have been recruited. All participants will be analysed according to the "Intention to treat" principle with comprehensive pre-planned cost- benefit and subgroup analyses.
Discussion: If effective, hypnosis would be a simple, inexpensive way to improve the childbirth experience, reduce complications associated with pharmacological interventions, yield cost savings in maternity care, and provide evidence to guide clinical practice.
Exclusion Criteria:
Usual care control
Hypnosis plus audio cd on hypnosis
Behavioral: antenatal hypnosis + audio compact disc on hypnosis
Audio CD on hypnosis sessions weekly on three occasions after 34 weeks gestation
Behavioral: Audio compact disc on hypnosis
The use of pharmacological analgesia during labour and childbirth will be collected from the birth register where all analgesia is documented by the attending midwife
Time frame: Within 24 hours of the birth
1. Maternal rating of the overall pain experienced during labour and childbirth
Time frame: Usually within 48 hours or before discharge from hospital
2. Mode of delivery
Time frame: Within 24 hours of the birth
3. Use of oxytocics
Time frame: Within 24 hours of the birth
4. Postnatal depression
Time frame: At 6 weeks and 6 months postnatal
5. Maternal anxiety
Time frame: At 6 weeks and 6 months postnatal
6. Neonatal Apgar score at 5 minutes < 7
Time frame: within 24 hours of birth
7. Maternal admission to the High Dependency Unit (HDU) or the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
Time frame: within 24 hours of birth
8. Maternal rating whether the birth experience was. Worse / better / same as expected
Time frame: within 24 hours of birth
9. Maternal rating of control during the labour during the birth
Time frame: within 24 hours of birth
10. Maternal rating whether the birth was rated positive or negative experience
Time frame: within 24 hours of birth
11. Length of neonatal nursery stay
Time frame: within 24 hours of birth
12. Length of maternal stay in hospital
Time frame: within 6 months of the birth
13. Number of women breast feeding at discharge from hospital and at 6 weeks and 6 months
Time frame: 6 months after birth
This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Women's and Children's Hospital, Australia