CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00267488Updated Jul 11, 2012Results posted

Intravenous Weekly Topotecan In Subjects With Recurrent Or Persistent Endometrial Cancer

A Phase 2 interventional study of topotecan in Neoplasms, Endometrial and Endometrial Cancer, sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. Completed at 24 sites in 3 countries. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-07-11.

Sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to find out if Hycamtin given weekly is safe and effective for treating your endometrial cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neoplasms, Endometrial
  • Endometrial Cancer

Keywords

  • Hycamtin
  • endometrial cancer
  • topotecan
03

In context

Endometrial Neoplasms

1,325 studies on the registry are indexed under Endometrial Neoplasms; 447 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 70 is close to the median of 70 across 941 interventional studies indexed under Endometrial Neoplasms.

Browse Endometrial Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

GlaxoSmithKline is the lead sponsor of 3,562 studies on the registry; 117 are open to participants now.

Of its 258 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 232 (90%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • A subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if all of the following criteria are met:
  • Subject has provided a written informed consent.
  • Subject must be female and ≥18 years of age.
  • Subjects' original endometrial carcinoma (any histologic type) must have had pathologic confirmation.
  • Subject must have recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer.
  • Subject must have at least one measurable lesion according to GOG-modified RECIST criteria.

    • Measurable disease must be accurately measured in at least one dimension (longest dimension to be recorded). Each lesion must be ≥ 20 mm when measured by conventional techniques, including palpation, plain X-ray, CT and MRI, or ≥10 mm when measured by spiral CT.
    • Measurable disease found on chest X-ray must be confirmed with CT or MRI. Either CT or MRI must be used throughout the study to further evaluate these lesions.
    • The same diagnostic method (CT, MRI, X-ray or physical exam) used to evaluate disease, must be used throughout the study to consistently evaluate lesions.
    • Palpable tumor masses that cannot be evaluated by CT or MRI scan should be evaluated by ultrasound or confirmed by biopsy.
    • Evaluable disease (measurable or non-measurable) may be in a field of prior radiation provided that at least six weeks have elapsed since receiving radiation and disease progression is clearly documented by radiographic study. It is preferential for the target lesion to be located outside an irradiated field.
    • Non-measurable disease is defined as all other lesions, including small lesions (longest diameter \<20 mm with conventional techniques or \<10 mm with spiral CT scan).
  • Subject has received one prior chemotherapy regimen (excluding all topoisomerase I inhibitors e.g., HYCAMTIN and irinotecan).
  • Subject is allowed to have received, but is not required to have received, one additional prior non-cytotoxic regimen for management of recurrent or persistent disease according to the following definition: Non-cytotoxic (biologic or cytostatic) agents include, but are not limited to, monoclonal antibodies, cytokines, and small molecule inhibitors of signal transduction. UM2004/00031/00 CONFIDENTIAL HCT100414 20
  • Subject is at least 21 days from prior chemotherapy and at least 30 days from prior non-cytotoxic therapy and is recovered from associated toxicities.
  • Subject must not have received radiotherapy for at least seven days.
  • Subject must be at least three weeks since last major surgery (a lesser period is acceptable if deemed in the best interest of the subject). Subject must have an ECOG Performance Status of 0 or 1 (refer to
  • Appendix 4, ECOG Performance Status).
  • Subject must have, at screening, a probable life expectancy of at least three months.
  • Subject of childbearing potential must be practicing adequate contraception [e.g., oral contraceptives, diaphragm plus spermicide, or intrauterine device (IUD)] or show documented complete abstinence from intercourse for at least three months prior to study start. The same contraceptive method should be used throughout the study and continue for at least four weeks after the end of the study. A subject will be considered of childbearing potential if not surgically sterile or post-menopausal (i.e., documented absence of menses for one year prior to entry into the study).

    1. Subject must have screening laboratory criteria as follows:
    • Hemoglobin ≥ 9.0 g/dL.
    • Neutrophils ≥ 1,500/mm³ [≥1.5 x 10\^9/L].
    • Platelets ≥ 100,000/mm³ [≥100.0 x 10\^9/L].
    • Creatinine ≤ upper limit of normal (ULN) or creatinine clearance (Clcreat) ≥ 60mL/min.
    • Creatinine clearance should be calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula:

Clcreat (mL/min) = (140-age [yr] x body wt [kg] x 0.85 72 x serum creatinine [mg/dL] OR Clcreat (mL/min) = 1.05 x (140-age [yr] x body wt [kg] serum creatinine [μmol/L]

  • Serum bilirubin within normal limits.
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase \< 2xULN if liver metastases are absent by abdominal CT or MRI or \< 5xULN if liver metastases are present.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

A subject will not be eligible for inclusion in this study if any of the following criteria are met:

  • Subject is pregnant or lactating.
  • Subject has received more than one prior chemotherapy regimen. UM2004/00031/00 CONFIDENTIAL HCT100414 21
  • Subject has concomitant or history of previous malignancies, with the exception of adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer, or other cancer from which the subject has been disease-free for five years.
  • Subject has active uncontrolled infection.
  • Subject has brain metastases as documented by CT or MRI. Note: Asymptomatic subjects do not require CT or MRI to rule out brain metastases.
  • Subject has received prior treatment with HYCAMTIN.
  • Subject has a history of an allergic reaction to compounds chemically-related to HYCAMTIN or its constituents.
  • Subject has received any investigational agent within 30 days or five half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to study entry.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
70 participants (actual)

Interventions

  • Drugtopotecan
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Best Overall Response

    Tumor response based on GOG (Gynecological Oncology Group) modified RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) criteria. A 4-point scale used specifying tumor response. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions; (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD; (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 98 when endpoints were met

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Progression

    Kaplan-Meier Estimate. Time to progression is defined as time from start of treatment until the first documented sign of disease progression or death due to progressive disease. Subjects who have not progressed or died at the time of analysis will be censored at the time of initiation of alternative anti-cancer therapy or time of last contact. Percentiles represent a set of points on a scale arrived at by dividing a group into parts in order of magnitude.

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 19 when endpoints were met

  2. Overall Survival

    Kaplan-Meier Estimate. Overall survival is defined as time from start of treatment until death due to any cause. Subjects who are alive at the time of analysis will be censored at the time of last contact.

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 98

  3. Response Duration

    The time from initial documented response to the first documented sign of progression or death due to progressive disease. Not calculated due to no Complete response and only 1 partial response.

    Time frame: Week 0 to week 98

  4. Time to Response

    The time from start of treatment until the first documented response. Not calculated due to no Complete response and only 1 partial response.

    Time frame: Week 0 to week 98

  5. Safety and Tolerability as Summarized Through Adverse Event Reporting

    AE = Adverse Event reported at a frequency of greater than or equal to 16%. SAE = Serious Adverse Events where all were reported at 0% frequency.

    Time frame: Week 0 to week 98

07

Results

Posted Jan 28, 2010
Limitations and caveats
As there was only 1 responder, time to response, and duration of response were not calculated.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTopotecan Hydrochloride
Started37
Completed26
Not completed11
Withdrew: Sponsor terminated study9
Withdrew: Protocol violation1
Withdrew: Other (disease progression)1

Outcome measures

PrimaryBest Overall Response

Tumor response based on GOG (Gynecological Oncology Group) modified RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) criteria. A 4-point scale used specifying tumor response. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions; (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD; (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions

Time frame:
Week 0 to Week 98 when endpoints were met
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Best Overall Response
ParticipantsTopotecan Hydrochloride
Complete Response0
Partial Response1
Stable Disease9
Progressive Disease23
Unknown4
SecondaryTime to Progression

Kaplan-Meier Estimate. Time to progression is defined as time from start of treatment until the first documented sign of disease progression or death due to progressive disease. Subjects who have not progressed or died at the time of analysis will be censored at the time of initiation of alternative anti-cancer therapy or time of last contact. Percentiles represent a set of points on a scale arrived at by dividing a group into parts in order of magnitude.

Time frame:
Week 0 to Week 19 when endpoints were met
Reported as:
Mean · Weeks
Time to Progression
WeeksTopotecan Hydrochloride
25th percentile7.3 (6.9 to 8.1)
Median percentile8.7 (7.9 to 11.1)
75th percentile15.3 (9.0 to 19.1)
SecondaryOverall Survival

Kaplan-Meier Estimate. Overall survival is defined as time from start of treatment until death due to any cause. Subjects who are alive at the time of analysis will be censored at the time of last contact.

Time frame:
Week 0 to Week 98
Reported as:
Mean · Weeks
Overall Survival
WeeksTopotecan Hydrochloride
25th percentile20.4 (10.1 to 31.7)
Median percentile47.3 (25.7 to 69.7)
75th percentile89.3 (61.6 to 98.1)
SecondaryResponse Duration

The time from initial documented response to the first documented sign of progression or death due to progressive disease. Not calculated due to no Complete response and only 1 partial response.

Time frame:
Week 0 to week 98
Reported as:
Mean · Weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryTime to Response

The time from start of treatment until the first documented response. Not calculated due to no Complete response and only 1 partial response.

Time frame:
Week 0 to week 98
Reported as:
Mean · Hours

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondarySafety and Tolerability as Summarized Through Adverse Event Reporting

AE = Adverse Event reported at a frequency of greater than or equal to 16%. SAE = Serious Adverse Events where all were reported at 0% frequency.

Time frame:
Week 0 to week 98
Reported as:
Number · Number of Events
Safety and Tolerability as Summarized Through Adverse Event Reporting
Number of EventsTopotecan Hydrochloride
AE: Fatigue15
AE: Nausea14
AE: Constipation12
AE: Abdominal Pain11
AE: Vomiting8
AE: Hypokalemia7
AE: Anorexia6
AE: Dyspnea6
AE: Diarrhea6
AE: Dizziness6
AE: Headache6
AE: Insomnia6
SAE: Abdominal Pain2
SAE: Gastrointestinal hemorrhage1
SAE: Intestinal obstruction1
SAE: Rectal Hemorrhage1
SAE: Vomiting1
SAE: Pulmonary Embolism3
SAE: Dyspnea1
SAE: Bacteremia1
SAE: Streptococcal Bacteremia1
SAE: Cerebral ischemia1
SAE: Cerebral infarction1
SAE: Incisional hernia, obstructive1
SAE: Dehydration1
SAE: Embolism venous1
Alive at last contact-when follow-up ended9
Deaths - any subject28
Cause of Death - Disease of Study25
Cause of Death - Non-Hematological toxicity2
Cause of Death - Other-Brain Metastases1

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Topotecan Hydrochloride———
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent serious events
EventTopotecan Hydrochloride
Pulmonary EmbolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/37
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders2/37
Gastrointestinal hemorrahageGastrointestinal disorders1/37
Intestinal ObstructionGastrointestinal disorders1/37
Rectal hemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders1/37
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders1/37
DyspneaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/37
BacteremiaInfections and infestations1/37
Streptococcal InfectionInfections and infestations1/37
Incisional hernia obstructiveMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/37
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 43
Most frequent other events
EventTopotecan Hydrochloride
FatigueGeneral disorders15/37
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders14/37
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders12/37
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders11/37
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders8/37
HypokalemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders7/37
AnorexiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders6/37
DyspneaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders6/37
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders6/37
DizzinessGeneral disorders6/37

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Topotecan Hydrochloride
Mean62.8 ± 9.12
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Topotecan Hydrochloride
Female37
Male0
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)Topotecan Hydrochloride
Caucasian34
African Heritage/African American3
08

Study locations

24 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site
    LaJolla, California 92037, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Newport Beach, California 92663, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Engelwood, Colorado 80113, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Coral Gables, Florida 33146, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Lakeland, Florida 33805, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Miami, Florida 33143, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Orlando, Florida 32804, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Atlanta, Georgia 30342, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hinsdale, Illinois 60521, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70115, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Lincoln, Nebraska 68510, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Columbia, South Carolina 29210, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Greenville, South Carolina 29605, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Chattanooga, Tennessee 37403, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Knoxville, Tennessee 37917, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Seattle, Washington 98104, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N2, Canada
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Montreal, Quebec H2L 4M1, Canada
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Quebec, G1R 2J6, Canada
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Debrecen, 4032, Hungary
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 11, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00267488
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 21, 2005
Start date
Oct 2005
Primary completion
Dec 2007
Completion
Dec 2007
Results posted
Jan 28, 2010
Last update
Jul 11, 2012

Study contacts

GSK Clinical Trials
study director · GlaxoSmithKline

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion