CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00263315Updated Aug 18, 2006

Inhalation of Liposomal Amphotericin B to Prevent Invasive Aspergillosis

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of nebulised liposomal amphotericin B in Aspergillosis, sponsored by Erasmus Medical Center. Completed at 2 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2006-08-18.

Sponsored by Erasmus Medical Center · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
320
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A Phase II/III randomized double-blind study comparing the safety and the efficacy of a weekly administration of 25 mg nebulized AmBisome with nebulized placebo solution to prevent invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in neutropenic hemato-oncologic patients.

Read the detailed description

The morbidity, mortality and costs of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in neutropenic patients are high. An effective intervention to prevent IPA would therefore be welcome. The incidence of IPA in neutropenic hematology patients in our institution was recently estimated to be 5-10%. Currently, only HEPA filtration is routinely used for the prevention of IPA. In 1988, Schmitt et al. showed a significant delayed mortality in rat model of IPA when rats were treated with aerosolized conventional amphotericin-B (amB) two days before infection (1). Conventional amB may interfere with surfactant function in the lungs. In contrast, liposomal amphotericin-B contains phospholipids that are structurally related to surfactant and inhibits natural surfactant function only slightly. Furthermore, in rats, mean concentrations of AmB in lungs were 3.7 times higher at day one and almost 6 times higher at day seven after a single dose treatment with aerosolized liposomal amB when compared with conventional AmB (2). Only one non-placebo controlled randomized clinical trial evaluated the prophylactic use of inhalation therapy with conventional amB for the prevention of IPA and a non-significant 43% reduction was observed (3). We postulate that the weekly inhalation of liposomal AmB in neutropenic hematology patients can prevent IPA.

In this randomised placebo controlled clinical trial we compare the safety and efficacy of the administration of nebulized liposomal AmB (2x/week) with placebo for the prevention of IPA in haematological patients with an expected duration of neutropenia of >10d. To demonstrate a reduction in incidence of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis from 7% to 1%, a total of 170 neutropenic episodes in each arm will be included (power 80%, two-tailed alfa=0.05). The primary efficacy endpoint is the cumulative percentage of patients developing a proven or probable IPA. Per protocol serum galactomannan levels are monitored 2x/week and a HR-CT of the lungs will be performed for unexplained fever (>5d) unresponsive to broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. EORTC/MSG criteria are used for diagnosis of IPA. The primary safety endpoint is a premature discontinuation of the study drug for >1week due to intolerance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aspergillosis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • aspergillosis
  • mycosis
  • neutropenia
  • primary prevention
  • hematologic diseases
  • amphotericin B
  • AmBisome
  • liposomal amphotericin B
03

In context

Aspergillosis

201 studies on the registry are indexed under Aspergillosis; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 320 is above the median of 50 across 106 interventional studies indexed under Aspergillosis.

Browse Aspergillosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Erasmus Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 466 studies on the registry; 179 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female hospitalized patients aged > 18 yr
  2. The patient has a hematologic malignancy or will receive a bone-marrow transplant
  3. The patient starts with a course of chemotherapy within 4 days or is already neutropenic at admission
  4. The expected duration of severe neutropenia (PMN\<0.5x10*9/L) following study entry is > 10 days
  5. The patient is receiving oral antibiotic prophylaxis and fluconazole
  6. Written informed consent has been obtained

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient shows evidence of a pulmonary fungal infection or a fungal sinusitis at trial entry
  2. The concomitant use of systemic anti-aspergillus treatment such as itraconazole or any intravenous formulation of amphotericin B at study entry
  3. Known hypersensitivity to amphotericin B
  4. Any evidence of pneumonia or pneumonitis at trial entry
  5. Any impossibility to use a nebulizer properly
  6. Expected survival \< 3 months at entry
  7. Pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double
Enrollment
320 participants

Interventions

  • Drugnebulised liposomal amphotericin B
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. SAFETY: Discontinuation for >1week due to intolerance

  2. EFFICACY: Proven/probable invasive pulmonary aspergillosis

Secondary outcomes

  1. SAFETY STUDY:

  2. A probably or definitely related AE of the respiratory tract (CTC grade > 2)

  3. Any probably or definitely related AE by type and severity (CTC grade > 2)

  4. Requirement of pre-medication to tolerate nebulization of the study drug

  5. Spirometric changes after inhalation

  6. EFFICACY STUDY:

  7. Proven, probable or possible invasive pulmonary aspergillosis

  8. A confirmed positive serum galactomannan concentration of 0.5 ng/ml or more

  9. The use of systemic antifungal drugs (days) during the neutropenic episodes

  10. The number of days of fever of unknown origin during neutropenia

  11. Mortality due to a pulmonary fungal infection

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Erasmus MC centrumlocatie
    Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • Erasmus MC locatie Daniel den Hoed
    Rotterdam, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Schmitt HJ, Bernard EM, Andrade J, Edwards F, Schmitt B, Armstrong D. MIC and fungicidal activity of terbinafine against clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 May;32(5):780-1. doi: 10.1128/AAC.32.5.780. PubMed 3134851 ↗
  • Cicogna CE, White MH, Bernard EM, Ishimura T, Sun M, Tong WP, Armstrong D. Efficacy of prophylactic aerosol amphotericin B lipid complex in a rat model of pulmonary aspergillosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997 Feb;41(2):259-61. doi: 10.1128/AAC.41.2.259. PubMed 9021176 ↗
  • Schwartz S, Behre G, Heinemann V, Wandt H, Schilling E, Arning M, Trittin A, Kern WV, Boenisch O, Bosse D, Lenz K, Ludwig WD, Hiddemann W, Siegert W, Beyer J. Aerosolized amphotericin B inhalations as prophylaxis of invasive aspergillus infections during prolonged neutropenia: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Blood. 1999 Jun 1;93(11):3654-61. PubMed 10339471 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 18, 2006, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00263315
Lead sponsor
Erasmus Medical Center
Collaborators
Gilead Sciences, Nexstar Pharmaceuticals
First posted
Dec 8, 2005
Start date
Jan 2000
Completion
May 2006
Last update
Aug 18, 2006

Study contacts

Bart JA Rijnders, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Erasmus Medical Center
Siem de Marie, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Erasmus Medical Center
Jan J Cornelissen, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Erasmus Medical Center
Lennert Slobbe, MD
principal investigator · Erasmus Medical Center
A Vulto, PhD
principal investigator · Erasmus Medical Center
M J Becker, PhD
principal investigator · Erasmus Medical Center
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2006. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion