A Phase 2/3 interventional study of nebulised liposomal amphotericin B in Aspergillosis, sponsored by Erasmus Medical Center. Completed at 2 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2006-08-18.
Sponsored by Erasmus Medical Center · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Prevention
A Phase II/III randomized double-blind study comparing the safety and the efficacy of a weekly administration of 25 mg nebulized AmBisome with nebulized placebo solution to prevent invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in neutropenic hemato-oncologic patients.
The morbidity, mortality and costs of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in neutropenic patients are high. An effective intervention to prevent IPA would therefore be welcome. The incidence of IPA in neutropenic hematology patients in our institution was recently estimated to be 5-10%. Currently, only HEPA filtration is routinely used for the prevention of IPA. In 1988, Schmitt et al. showed a significant delayed mortality in rat model of IPA when rats were treated with aerosolized conventional amphotericin-B (amB) two days before infection (1). Conventional amB may interfere with surfactant function in the lungs. In contrast, liposomal amphotericin-B contains phospholipids that are structurally related to surfactant and inhibits natural surfactant function only slightly. Furthermore, in rats, mean concentrations of AmB in lungs were 3.7 times higher at day one and almost 6 times higher at day seven after a single dose treatment with aerosolized liposomal amB when compared with conventional AmB (2). Only one non-placebo controlled randomized clinical trial evaluated the prophylactic use of inhalation therapy with conventional amB for the prevention of IPA and a non-significant 43% reduction was observed (3). We postulate that the weekly inhalation of liposomal AmB in neutropenic hematology patients can prevent IPA.
In this randomised placebo controlled clinical trial we compare the safety and efficacy of the administration of nebulized liposomal AmB (2x/week) with placebo for the prevention of IPA in haematological patients with an expected duration of neutropenia of >10d. To demonstrate a reduction in incidence of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis from 7% to 1%, a total of 170 neutropenic episodes in each arm will be included (power 80%, two-tailed alfa=0.05). The primary efficacy endpoint is the cumulative percentage of patients developing a proven or probable IPA. Per protocol serum galactomannan levels are monitored 2x/week and a HR-CT of the lungs will be performed for unexplained fever (>5d) unresponsive to broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. EORTC/MSG criteria are used for diagnosis of IPA. The primary safety endpoint is a premature discontinuation of the study drug for >1week due to intolerance.
201 studies on the registry are indexed under Aspergillosis; 22 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 320 is above the median of 50 across 106 interventional studies indexed under Aspergillosis.
Browse Aspergillosis studies →Erasmus Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 466 studies on the registry; 179 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
SAFETY: Discontinuation for >1week due to intolerance
EFFICACY: Proven/probable invasive pulmonary aspergillosis
SAFETY STUDY:
A probably or definitely related AE of the respiratory tract (CTC grade > 2)
Any probably or definitely related AE by type and severity (CTC grade > 2)
Requirement of pre-medication to tolerate nebulization of the study drug
Spirometric changes after inhalation
EFFICACY STUDY:
Proven, probable or possible invasive pulmonary aspergillosis
A confirmed positive serum galactomannan concentration of 0.5 ng/ml or more
The use of systemic antifungal drugs (days) during the neutropenic episodes
The number of days of fever of unknown origin during neutropenia
Mortality due to a pulmonary fungal infection
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2006. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Erasmus Medical Center