CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00257296Updated Feb 13, 2018

Evaluation of an Intimate Partner Violence Screening-Intervention

An interventional study of Screening and Intervention and Usual Care in Domestic Violence, sponsored by University at Albany. Completed. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-02-13.

Sponsored by University at Albany · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2004, registered Nov 2005).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
471
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate a multi-faceted intimate partner violence (IPV) screening/intervention targeting abused women who are seen for prenatal care in obstetrics-gynecology clinics or general medical care in internal medicine clinics. The intervention is based on our clinical experience and review of the literature which suggests: 1) IPV can vary and no one pattern exists for all women; 2) recovery from abuse usually occurs over time and not necessarily immediately after it is first detected; 3) women have gone down many different paths leading to an abusive relationship and there is no single path to recovery; 4) for screening/interventions to be credible and ultimately disseminated they must respond to the complexity of the patient stories clinicians see everyday when caring for women experiencing IPV and 5) busy obstetricians/internists/clinicians are unlikely to effectively screen and treat women experiencing IPV unless they are supported by other personnel trained to address IPV as well.

The intervention also is based on recommendations of IPV experts and on the theory of chronic disease management that recognizes that the best outcomes are achieved when: 1) patients are educated and given the support and skills to set their own goals and make their own choices; 2) multidisciplinary teams work better than programs focused only on physician behavior; 3) active monitoring of progress is essential; 4) active coping styles using a range of therapeutic modalities are available and 5) a stepped approach is utilized with those not making progress or with more severe problems receiving the greatest intensity of services.

The screening/intervention will be available to each abused woman for approximately three to six months. Patients in the evaluation study will be surveyed at the following time points: baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and for the partial cohort that starts early, 9 months. Additionally, a sample of nonabused women will be surveyed at baseline to serve as a referent group.

Our primary hypotheses are, that compared to usual care, abused women receiving the intervention will have a reduction in levels of IPV, decreases in depression and nonspecific physical symptoms, increase in functional health status, increase in safety behaviors, increase in help seeking for issues related to IPV, and reduction of general medical services.

02

Conditions studied

  • Domestic Violence
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University at Albany is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Females Ages 18 to 45 years Seen at study sites for primary care during study periods Speaks English Able to separate from accompanying person(s) Willing to participant

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Too ill to participate Unable to separate from accompanying person(s) Unable to speak English Refuse to participant

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
471 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Screening and Intervention

    Use a computer-based screening tool for intimate partner violence and provide a multi-faceted intervention based on the needs of the woman and services should would like to utilize.

    Other: Screening and Intervention

  • Active comparator
    Usual Care

    Use a computer-based screening tool for intimate partner violence and provide list of resources available. Also, all physicians were trained on intimate partner violence and were told they could help anyone regardless of randomization.

    Other: Usual Care

Interventions

  • OtherScreening and Intervention

    Screening for intimate partner violence and providing a multi-faceted intervention which depends on the needs of the patient

  • OtherUsual Care

    Screening for intimate partner violence and provide enhanced usual care which includes providing resource list, educating medical staff and partner violence and instructing physicians to help all patients regardless of assigned arm.

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 13, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00257296
Lead sponsor
University at Albany
Collaborators
Johns Hopkins University
Responsible party
Louise-Anne McNutt (Associate Professor, University at Albany) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 22, 2005
Start date
Aug 1, 2004
Primary completion
Oct 15, 2005
Completion
Oct 15, 2005
Last update
Feb 13, 2018

Study contacts

Louise-Anne McNutt, PhD
principal investigator · University at Albany, State University of New York
Daniel Ford, MD, MS
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins University
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion