An interventional study of optimised treatment in Type 2 Diabetes, sponsored by University of Aarhus. Completed at 4 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 69 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-12-20.
Sponsored by University of Aarhus · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
The ADDITION study comprise 2 parts: screening for Type 2 diabetes and intensive treatment compared to standard treatment.
Aims:
Design and methods:
The study is an investigator initiated and designed study, initiated in Denmark by the two principal investigators, planned and conducted in collaboration between the four centers in Denmark, UK and the Netherlands. The study has two elements: a screening study and a subsequent intervention study.
In the screening study, the feasibility and results of country specific models to identify undiagnosed individuals with Type 2 diabetes will be evaluated.
In the treatment study the effects of routine care in general practice according to local and national guidelines will be compared with an intensive ADDITION protocol, including structured lifestyle education (dietary modification, increased physical activity and smoking cessation) and intensive treatment of blood glucose, blood pressure and lipids, and prophylactic aspirin with or without motivational interviewing, on mortality, macrovascular and microvascular disease. Furthermore the impact of treatment on health status, treatment satisfaction and health service costs will also be assessed.
Methodology - Screening study:
In Denmark > 300 primary care physicians from 5 different counties (Copenhagen, Aarhus, Ringkøbing, Ribe and Sønderjylland) participate in the study. Diabetes-related information is sent to all individuals aged 40-69 years enrolled in their practice. A questionnaire (diabetes risk score29) including age, gender, family history of type 2 diabetes; obesity; physical activity and previously diagnosed hypertension was used. Individuals scoring high on the questionnaire are encouraged to contact their physician for an examination of random blood glucose (RGB) and HbA1c. A step-wise strategy based on RBG, HbA1c, FPG and OGTT is used to diagnose diabetes In the Netherlands all people aged 50-69 years and listed with the participating primary care physicians is invited to fill in a diabetes risk questionnaire based on the same risk factors as in Denmark. Those at high risk of having type 2 diabetes are requested to come for a screening visit at a centre set up near the general practice. A stepwise screening strategy based on RBG, FPG and OGTT is used to diagnose diabetes In UK, different strategies are used in Cambridgeshire and Leicester. In Cambridgeshire a search of computerised general practice records is performed, using a simple validated risk score, based on routine general practice data (age, gender, prescribed medication and body mass index), to identify people in the age of 40-69 years at high risk of having undiagnosed diabetes30. Those with a high score undergo a stepwise screening strategy based on RBG, FPG and OGTT is used to diagnose diabetes In Leicester all white European subjects aged 40-75 years and Asian, black or Chinese subjects aged 25-75 years are invited in a restricted geographical region within Leicester. All attendant undergo an OGTT as the first screening step (unless FPG > 7.0 mmol/l)
Diagnostic procedures:
The diagnostic procedure includes a stepwise procedure minimizing the work-load on the general practitioner and includes the questionnaire, random capillary blood glucose and HbA1c as screening instruments followed by fasting capillary blood glucose (FCBG) and an oral glucose tolerance test in everyone with marginally elevated FCBG. The diagnostic criteria follow the most recent World Health Organization guidelines (31) and are based on two diagnostic glucose values measured on independent days.
Exclusion criteria:
Participants are excluded if they already have diabetes, are pregnant or lactating or have a severe psychotic illness, are house bound or have an illness with a likely survival of less than one year.
Outcome measures:
Outcome measures from the screening study include measures of the efficacy of the screening campaign, the objective health status of patients newly identified by the campaign, feasibility as reported by the primary care physician, and the economic impact or benefit of the a programme. Furthermore a substudy explores the psycho-social and ethical aspects of the screening programme.
Methodology - Intervention study:
All patients diagnosed as part of the screening programme are invited to enter the ADDITION-study. The study will include a minimum of 3000 patients with screen detected diabetes. The general practices are randomised to the routine care group (standard care as given by the GP) or to the intervention group which features a target driven, intensive multifactorial approach to treatment. The study is an open, multicentre, parallel group trial with randomisation of general practices. Patients are screened and recruited during the period January 1st 2000 and June 30th 2006. The end of follow up is by July 1st 2009. Participation is based on informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Intensive Treatment strategy:
The intensive multifactorial treatment includes lifestyle advices (concerning diet, physical activity, medication adherence and tobacco cessation), prescription of aspirin and stepwise increases in pharmacological treatment of blood glucose, blood pressure and lipids, according to strict targets (appendix 1). The treatment targets are as follows:
The treatment targets may be intensified during the study according to the results of other clinical trials published during the study period, as the aim is to strive for treatment targets based on the most intensive guidelines available.
Within the intensive group a further randomisation allocates 50% of the patients to country specific interventions concerned with improving adherence to lifestyle changes and medication. This intervention, including the use of motivational interviewing) is delivered either by a trained facilitator (UK and The Netherlands) or through training of practitioners (Denmark), and is based on a client-centred non-directive counseling style to help patients explore and resolve ambivalence and stimulate lifestyle changes, appropriate diabetes self-care and adherence to medical treatment 32,33.
Pharmacological treatment:
The decision on which pharmaceutical drug to use for the individual patients with is made by the clinician as the study is target driven and not a trial comparing different specific drugs. The clinician is provided with recommendations for a treatment strategy (appendix 1), which should be based on balancing treatment effect, side-effects and cost. The main priority is achievement of treatment targets with a flexible lifestyle and low rates of side effects such as hypoglycaemia and weight gain.
Therapies are adjusted at 2 to 4-weekly intervals until targets are reached, thereafter every 3 months. HbA1c is taken every third month, in between antidiabetic drugs are adjusted according to blood glucose measurements in the interim.
Outcome measures: see other section.
Sample size and statistical power:
Based on levels of risk in the conservative-treatment arm of the UKPDS, the expected event rate is 3% per year for the combined endpoint (all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularisation or amputation). With a sample size of 1350 patients in each arm (standard versus intensive treatment) the study will allow the detection of a 30% risk reduction in the intervention group at a significance level of 5% with a mean duration of follow-up of 5 years.
Timescale:
The screening study began in late 2000 and will end by June 30th 2006. Patients are enrolled into the treatment study following diagnosis in the screening study: thus the treatment study proceeds along with the evaluation phase of the screening study. The follow-up will continue until July 1st 2009.
Ethics and safety:
The Scientific Ethics Committee in the involved counties in Denmark and the Multipractice Study Committee have accepted the project, and the study has been approved by the ethical committees in UK and the Netherlands.
A data safety and monitoring committee will have access to all end point data (unblinded) after 1, 3 and 5 years, and the study will be terminated if the composite end point (including: Cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, revascularisation and amputation) should demonstrate a clear advantage of intensive versus standard treatment (p\<0.001) or a clear advantage of the standard versus intensive treatment (p\<0.01).
Perspectives of the trial:
The results of the study will be of immediate national and international relevance to policy decisions about screening for diabetes, and subsequent intensive treatment. If the study shows that screening and early intervention markedly reduces the risk of developing premature CVD, then the study will have potential important impact at the individual patient level as well as on the societal level. If the study fails to show an effect of screening and early intensive treatment then this would have direct impact on future recommendations for screening and treatment regimens, and the study could lead to significant savings if it shows that strict treatment targets are not essential in the early phase of the disease. The results of the sub-study will inform approaches to health promotion to the management of chronic disease and risk, and to strategies to support adherence applicable not only to diabetes but also to other chronic diseases.
References and Appendix 1 on www.addition.au.dk
10,925 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 3,057 is above the median of 80 across 8,367 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.
Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →University of Aarhus is the lead sponsor of 1,274 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Screening study: Every one aged 40-69 years (UK and DK) or 50-69 years(NL). Treatment study: All with screen detected type 2 diabetes.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants are excluded if they already have diabetes at time of screening, are pregnant or lactating or have a severe psychotic illness, are house bound or have an illness with a likely survival of less than one year.
The 334 general practices in Denmark, United Kingdom and the Netherlands have been randomised to screening for diabetes followed by routine care (RC group) according to national guidelines, or screening followed by multifactorial treatment (IT group).
Procedure: optimised treatment
The intervention targeted individual patients and the Primary Care Team. Practitioners were trained in a target driven, intensive multifactorial approach including lifestyle advice (smoking cessation, physical activity 30 min./day and healthy diet) and pharmacological treatment with the aim of reducing the complications of diabetes as described in protocol. The training included meetings, practice visiting, written feed back reports and reminders on controls.
Cardiovascular mortality
Time frame: Sept 2010
MI (non fatal)
Time frame: Sept 2010
Stroke (non fatal)
Time frame: Sept 2010
Revascularisation (operating procedures)
Time frame: Sept 2010
Amputations, non traumatic
Time frame: Sept 2010
All cause mortality
Time frame: 2010
Development of renal impairment
Time frame: 2010
Progression of retinopathy
Time frame: 2010
Health economy, patient and health service costs and gains
Time frame: 2010
Perceived health, SF36, AddQol
Time frame: 2010
Neuropathy, periphery and autonomy
Time frame: 2011
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Aarhus