CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00048035Updated Dec 20, 2016Results posted

A Study of Intravenous (iv) Mircera in Hemodialysis Patients With Chronic Renal Anemia

A Phase 2 interventional study of methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera] in Anemia, sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche. Completed at 14 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-12-20.

Sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
91
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will determine the appropriate dose and frequency of administration of iv Mircera maintenance therapy in hemodialysis patients with chronic renal anemia who were previously receiving iv epoetin. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months and the target sample size is \<100 individuals.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anemia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Anemia

1,733 studies on the registry are indexed under Anemia; 246 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 91 is close to the median of 94 across 1,291 interventional studies indexed under Anemia.

Browse Anemia studies →

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche is the lead sponsor of 2,061 studies on the registry; 85 are open to participants now.

Of its 319 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 239 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • adult patients >=18 years of age;
  • chronic renal anemia;
  • on hemodialysis therapy for at least 3 months;
  • receiving iv epoetin alfa during the 2 weeks prior to the run-in period.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or using unreliable birth control methods;
  • use of any investigational drug within 30 days of the run-in phase, or during the run-in or study treatment period.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
91 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cohort 1 (RO0503821 [0.25/150 1x/week])

    Eligible participant will be administered RO0503821 (methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta \[Mircera\]) intravenously (IV) using a dose conversion factor of 0.25/150 microgram (mcg)/kilogram (kg) of the previous weekly erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) dose, (equal to 62.50% assumed equi-effective dose) once weekly up to 19 weeks. After 19 weeks of core treatment period, participants will be followed-up for two optional treatment extension periods (54 weeks each).

    Drug: methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera]

  • Experimental
    Cohort 2 (RO0503821 [0.25/150 1x/2week])

    Eligible participant will be administered RO0503821 IV using a dose conversion factor of 0.25/150 mcg/kg of the previous weekly ESA dose, (equal to 62.50% assumed equi-effective dose) once in every two weeks up to 19 weeks. After 19 weeks of core treatment period, participants will be followed-up for two optional treatment extension periods (54 weeks each).

    Drug: methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera]

  • Experimental
    Cohort 3 (RO0503821 [0.4/150 1x/week])

    Eligible participant will be administered RO0503821 IV using a dose conversion factor of 0.40/150 mcg/kg of the previous weekly ESA dose, (equal to100% assumed equi-effective dose) once weekly up to 19 weeks. After 19 weeks of core treatment period, participants will be followed-up for two optional treatment extension periods (54 weeks each).

    Drug: methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera]

  • Experimental
    Cohort 4 (RO0503821 [0.4/150 1x/2week])

    Eligible participant will be administered RO0503821 IV using a dose conversion factor of 0.40/150 mcg/kg of the previous weekly ESA dose, (equal to 100% assumed equi-effective dose) once in every two weeks up to 19 weeks. After 19 weeks of core treatment period, participants will be followed-up for two optional treatment extension periods (54 weeks each).

    Drug: methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera]

  • Experimental
    Cohort 5 (RO0503821 [0.6/150 1x/week])

    Eligible participant will be administered RO0503821 IV using a dose conversion factor of 0.60/150 mcg/kg of the previous weekly ESA dose, (equal to150% assumed equi-effective dose) once weekly up to 19 weeks. After 19 weeks of core treatment period, participants will be followed-up for two optional treatment extension periods (54 weeks each).

    Drug: methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera]

  • Experimental
    Cohort 6 (RO0503821 [0.6/150 1x/2week])

    Eligible participant will be administered RO0503821 IV using a dose conversion factor of 0.60/150 mcg/kg of the previous weekly ESA dose, (equal to150% assumed equi-effective dose) once in every two weeks up to 19 weeks. After 19 weeks of core treatment period, participants will be followed-up for two optional treatment extension periods (54 weeks each).

    Drug: methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera]

Interventions

  • Drugmethoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera]

    Differing doses and frequencies of iv administration

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Median Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen

    Median change from Baseline in hemoglobin (Hb) levels to end of initial treatment (EOIT) under constant dosing regimen was reported. For ease of interpretation, all individual slope values were multiplied by 42 to give an estimate of change in Hb values over six weeks. Baseline (Day -28 to Day 1) Hb values was calculated as the mean of the screening assessment (SA) and run-in period (Week -2 and Week -1). For all participants, an EOIT value was calculated as the last observed Hb value before a dose change or blood transfusion. For participants without any dose adjustments or blood transfusion, the EOIT value was identical to the Week 19 value.

    Time frame: From Baseline (Day -28 to Day 1) to EOIT (Week 19)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Median Change From Baseline in Hematocrit Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen

    Median change from Baseline in hematocrit (Hct) levels to end of initial treatment under constant dosing regimen was reported. Baseline (Day -28 to Day 1) Hct values was calculated as the mean of the SA and run-in period (Weeks -2 and -1). For all participants, an EOIT value was calculated as the last observed Hct value before a dose change or blood transfusion. For participants without any dose adjustments or blood transfusion, the EOIT value was identical to the Week 19 value.

    Time frame: From Baseline (Day -28 to Day 1) to EOIT (Week 19)

  2. Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, And Deaths

    An Adverse Events (AEs) is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a significant medical event in the investigator's judgment or requires intervention to prevent one or other of these outcomes. ). The study design tested 3 different starting dose conversion factors at 3 different dosing schedules during the core study period. As study drug doses can be modified continually over time all results for the two long term safety periods were displayed by dose schedule group only.

    Time frame: Up to Week 126

  3. Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities

    Marked abnormality was defined as above and/or below a value which was considered to be potentially clinically relevant. The number of participants with marked lab abnormality across treatment groups were reported and presented. Marked laboratory abnormalities were analyzed according to the Roche specified limits for the following reference range: White blood cells (WBC) (3.0- 18.0 10\^9/L), Platelets (100 - 550 10\^9/L), Alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) \[0 110 units per litre (U/L)\], Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) (0 - 220 U/L), Aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) (0 - 80 U/L), Albumin \>= 30 g/L, Phosphate \[0.75 - 1.60 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)\], Potassium (2.9 - 5.8 mmol/L), Glucose (2.80 - 11.10 mmol/L).

    Time frame: Up to Week 126

  4. Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After Dialysis

    Mean Change from Baseline in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is calculated as the end of treatment values minus the Baseline value. Baseline (Day -28 to Day 1) values were calculated as the mean of the screening assessment (SA) and run-in period (Week -2 and Week -1).

    Time frame: From Baseline (Day -28 to Day 1) to Week 126

  5. Mean Change in Pulse Rate

    Participants pulse rates in beats per minute (BpM) were analyzed at sitting position using descriptive statistical methods (ie, means, standard deviations and percentiles). The changes in pulse rate throughout the study were analysed at each study visit and mean change is reported.

    Time frame: Up to Week 126

07

Results

Posted Dec 20, 2016

Participant flow

A total of 91 participants were enrolled in this study conducted from 19 March 2002 to 08 June 2005 at 14 Sites in United States.

Core Period
Participant flow — Core Period
MilestoneCohort 1 (RO0503821 [0.25/150 1x/ Week])Cohort 2 (RO0503821 [0.25/150 1x/2 Week])Cohort 3 (RO0503821 [0.4/150 1x/ Week])Cohort 4 (RO0503821 [0.4/150 1x/2week])Cohort 5 (RO0503821 [0.6/150 1x/ Week])Cohort 6 (RO0503821 [0.6/150 1x/2 Week])RO0503821 (1x/Week)RO0503821 (1x/2Week)
Started15151515161500
Completed11131414151400
Not completed42111100
Withdrew: Early withdrawals42111100
Extension Year 1
Participant flow — Extension Year 1
MilestoneCohort 1 (RO0503821 [0.25/150 1x/ Week])Cohort 2 (RO0503821 [0.25/150 1x/2 Week])Cohort 3 (RO0503821 [0.4/150 1x/ Week])Cohort 4 (RO0503821 [0.4/150 1x/2week])Cohort 5 (RO0503821 [0.6/150 1x/ Week])Cohort 6 (RO0503821 [0.6/150 1x/2 Week])RO0503821 (1x/Week)RO0503821 (1x/2Week)
Started0000002726
Completed0000001615
Not completed0000001111
Withdrew: Early withdrawals0000001111
Extension Year 2
Participant flow — Extension Year 2
MilestoneCohort 1 (RO0503821 [0.25/150 1x/ Week])Cohort 2 (RO0503821 [0.25/150 1x/2 Week])Cohort 3 (RO0503821 [0.4/150 1x/ Week])Cohort 4 (RO0503821 [0.4/150 1x/2week])Cohort 5 (RO0503821 [0.6/150 1x/ Week])Cohort 6 (RO0503821 [0.6/150 1x/2 Week])RO0503821 (1x/Week)RO0503821 (1x/2Week)
Started0000001413
Completed0000001110
Not completed00000033
Withdrew: Early withdrawals00000033

Outcome measures

PrimaryMedian Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen

Median change from Baseline in hemoglobin (Hb) levels to end of initial treatment (EOIT) under constant dosing regimen was reported. For ease of interpretation, all individual slope values were multiplied by 42 to give an estimate of change in Hb values over six weeks. Baseline (Day -28 to Day 1) Hb values was calculated as the mean of the screening assessment (SA) and run-in period (Week -2 and Week -1). For all participants, an EOIT value was calculated as the last observed Hb value before a dose change or blood transfusion. For participants without any dose adjustments or blood transfusion, the EOIT value was identical to the Week 19 value.

Time frame:
From Baseline (Day -28 to Day 1) to EOIT (Week 19)
Reported as:
Median · g/dL
Median Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen
g/dLCohort 1 (RO0503821 [0.25/150 1x/Week])Cohort 2 (RO0503821 [0.25/150 1x/2week])Cohort 3 (RO0503821 [0.4/150 1x/Week])Cohort 4 (RO0503821 [0.4/150 1x/2week])Cohort 5 (RO0503821 [0.6/150 1x/Week])Cohort 6 (RO0503821 [0.6/150 1x/2week])
Median Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen-0.29 (-1.14 to 0.08)-0.92 (-1.72 to 0.29)-0.04 (-0.41 to 1.24)-0.46 (-1.26 to -0.05)0.86 (0.15 to 1.31)-0.07 (-0.93 to 0.48)
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort 1 (RO0503821 [0.25/150 1x/Week]) vs Cohort 3 (RO0503821 [0.4/150 1x/Week]) vs Cohort 5 (RO0503821 [0.6/150 1x/Week]) · Estimated conversion factor 90% ci: 0.38 · 90% CI 0.32 to 0.42To analyze the appropriateness of the chosen dose conversion factors, a second regression analysis was carried out. This was a regression on the three different conversion factor dose groups, using the regression slope estimates of Hb.
  • Cohort 2 (RO0503821 [0.25/150 1x/2week]) vs Cohort 4 (RO0503821 [0.4/150 1x/2week]) vs Cohort 6 (RO0503821 [0.6/150 1x/2week]) · Estimated conversion factor 90% ci: 0.61 · 90% CI 0.53 to 0.76To analyze the appropriateness of the chosen dose conversion factors, a second regression analysis was carried out. This was a regression on the three different conversion factor dose groups, using the regression slope estimates of Hb change.
SecondaryMedian Change From Baseline in Hematocrit Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen

Median change from Baseline in hematocrit (Hct) levels to end of initial treatment under constant dosing regimen was reported. Baseline (Day -28 to Day 1) Hct values was calculated as the mean of the SA and run-in period (Weeks -2 and -1). For all participants, an EOIT value was calculated as the last observed Hct value before a dose change or blood transfusion. For participants without any dose adjustments or blood transfusion, the EOIT value was identical to the Week 19 value.

Time frame:
From Baseline (Day -28 to Day 1) to EOIT (Week 19)
Reported as:
Median · g/dL
Median Change From Baseline in Hematocrit Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen
g/dLCohort 1 (RO0503821 [0.25/150 1x/Week])Cohort 2 (RO0503821 [0.25/150 1x/2week])Cohort 3 (RO0503821 [0.4/150 1x/Week])Cohort 4 (RO0503821 [0.4/150 1x/2week])Cohort 5 (RO0503821 [0.6/150 1x/Week])Cohort 6 (RO0503821 [0.6/150 1x/2week])
Median Change From Baseline in Hematocrit Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen-1.50 (-3.31 to 0.30)-3.01 (-5.14 to -0.89)-0.32 (-1.26 to 4.08)-1.62 (-4.25 to -0.21)2.73 (0.37 to 4.28)-0.07 (-2.57 to 1.51)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, And Deaths

An Adverse Events (AEs) is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a significant medical event in the investigator's judgment or requires intervention to prevent one or other of these outcomes. ). The study design tested 3 different starting dose conversion factors at 3 different dosing schedules during the core study period. As study drug doses can be modified continually over time all results for the two long term safety periods were displayed by dose schedule group only.

Time frame:
Up to Week 126
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, And Deaths
ParticipantsRO0503821 (1x/Week)RO0503821 (1x/2Week)
Any AEs4237
Any SAEs2020
Deaths32
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities

Marked abnormality was defined as above and/or below a value which was considered to be potentially clinically relevant. The number of participants with marked lab abnormality across treatment groups were reported and presented. Marked laboratory abnormalities were analyzed according to the Roche specified limits for the following reference range: White blood cells (WBC) (3.0- 18.0 10\^9/L), Platelets (100 - 550 10\^9/L), Alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) \[0 110 units per litre (U/L)\], Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) (0 - 220 U/L), Aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) (0 - 80 U/L), Albumin \>= 30 g/L, Phosphate \[0.75 - 1.60 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)\], Potassium (2.9 - 5.8 mmol/L), Glucose (2.80 - 11.10 mmol/L).

Time frame:
Up to Week 126
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
ParticipantsCohort 1 (RO0503821 [0.25/150 1x/Week])Cohort 2 (RO0503821 [0.25/150 1x/2week])Cohort 3 (RO0503821 [0.4/150 1x/Week])Cohort 4 (RO0503821 [0.4/150 1x/2week])Cohort 5 (RO0503821 [0.6/150 1x/Week])Cohort 6 (RO0503821 [0.6/150 1x/2week])
Phosphate -High; (n = 15, 15, 15, 15 , 16 , 15)313442
Phosphate -Low; (n = 15, 15, 15, 15 , 16 , 15)011020
Potassium -High; (n = 15, 15, 15, 15 , 16 , 15)001020
Potassium -Low; (n = 15, 15, 15, 15 , 16 , 15)000000
Platelets - High; (n = 15, 15, 15, 15 , 16 , 15)000000
Platelets - Low; (n = 15, 15, 15, 15 , 16 , 15)001100
WBC - High; (n = 15, 15, 15, 15 , 16 , 15)000000
WBC - Low; (n = 15, 15, 15, 15 , 16 , 15)001100
Basophils - High; (n = 15, 15, 14, 15 , 16 , 15)000000
Eosinophils - High; (n = 15, 15, 14, 15 , 16 , 15)000000
Lymphocytes - High; (n = 15, 15, 15, 15 , 16 , 15)000000
Lymphocytes - Low; (n = 15, 15, 15, 15 , 16 , 15)032123
Monocytes - High; (n = 15, 15, 15, 15 , 16 , 15)000000
Monocytes - Low; (n = 15, 15, 15, 15 , 16 , 15)000000
Neutrophils - Low; (n = 15, 15, 14, 15 , 16 , 15)000100
ALAT - High; (n = 15, 15, 15, 15 , 16 , 15)001000
ALP - High; (n = 15, 15, 15, 15 , 16 , 15)101001
ASAT - High; (n = 15, 15, 15, 15 , 16 , 15)001000
Total Bilirubin-High; (n = 15, 15, 15, 15, 16, 15)000001
Albumin - Low; (n = 15, 15, 15, 15 , 16 , 15)100000
Glucose Fasting -High; (n = 5, 6, 9, 6, 6 , 9)000000
Glucose Fasting -Low; (n = 5, 6, 9, 6, 6 , 9)000000
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After Dialysis

Mean Change from Baseline in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is calculated as the end of treatment values minus the Baseline value. Baseline (Day -28 to Day 1) values were calculated as the mean of the screening assessment (SA) and run-in period (Week -2 and Week -1).

Time frame:
From Baseline (Day -28 to Day 1) to Week 126
Reported as:
Mean · mm HG
Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After Dialysis
mm HGCohort 1 (RO0503821 [0.25/150 1x/Week])Cohort 2 (RO0503821 [0.25/150 1x/2week])Cohort 3 (RO0503821 [0.4/150 1x/Week])Cohort 4 (RO0503821 [0.4/150 1x/2week])Cohort 5 (RO0503821 [0.6/150 1x/Week])Cohort 6 (RO0503821 [0.6/150 1x/2week])
DBP- before dialysis-2 ± 12.2-1 ± 14.7-10 ± 12.4-8 ± 14.3-6 ± 13.1-10 ± 12.4
DBP - After dialysis4 ± 16.70 ± 19.0-0 ± 14.5-8 ± 18.0-6 ± 18.1-0 ± 14.5
SBP - before dialysis-1 ± 26.45 ± 25.5-15 ± 21.6-15 ± 23.8-11 ± 21.7-15 ± 21.6
SBP - After dialysis6 ± 30.13 ± 26.5-3 ± 30.4-13 ± 26.7-6 ± 27.1-3 ± 30.4
SecondaryMean Change in Pulse Rate

Participants pulse rates in beats per minute (BpM) were analyzed at sitting position using descriptive statistical methods (ie, means, standard deviations and percentiles). The changes in pulse rate throughout the study were analysed at each study visit and mean change is reported.

Time frame:
Up to Week 126
Reported as:
Mean · BpM
Mean Change in Pulse Rate
BpMCohort 1 (RO0503821 [0.25/150 1x/Week])Cohort 2 (RO0503821 [0.25/150 1x/2week])Cohort 3 (RO0503821 [0.4/150 1x/Week])Cohort 4 (RO0503821 [0.4/150 1x/2week])Cohort 5 (RO0503821 [0.6/150 1x/Week])Cohort 6 (RO0503821 [0.6/150 1x/2week])
Mean Change in Pulse Rate-1 ± 10.11 ± 14.82 ± 10.53 ± 14.1-1 ± 10.23 ± 12.6

Adverse events

Collected over Up to Week 126. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
RO0503821 (1/Week)—20/46 (43.5%)34/46 (73.9%)
RO0503821 (1/2week)—20/45 (44.4%)30/45 (66.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 60
Most frequent serious events
EventRO0503821 (1/Week)RO0503821 (1/2week)
Gastrointestinal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders2/463/45
Cardiac Failure CongestiveCardiac disorders3/461/45
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders1/462/45
Wound infectionInfections and infestations0/462/45
Angina pectorisCardiac disorders2/461/45
Coronary artery diseaseCardiac disorders2/460/45
CellulitisInfections and infestations2/460/45
PneumoniaInfections and infestations2/460/45
SepsisInfections and infestations2/460/45
HemiparesisNervous system disorders2/460/45
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 36
Most frequent other events
EventRO0503821 (1/Week)RO0503821 (1/2week)
HeadacheNervous system disorders10/464/45
DizzinessNervous system disorders4/468/45
PyrexiaGeneral disorders3/467/45
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/467/45
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations7/462/45
FatigueGeneral disorders5/466/45
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/466/45
Arteriovenous fistula site complicationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications6/461/45
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders5/465/45
Procedural hypotensionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications3/465/45

Baseline characteristics

The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population was used for the analysis. It was defined as all randomized participants.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Cohort 1 (RO0503821 [0.25/150 1x/Week])Cohort 2 (RO0503821 [0.25/150 1x/2 Week])Cohort 3 (RO0503821 [0.4/150 1x/Week])Cohort 4 (RO0503821 [0.4/150 1x/2week])Cohort 5 (RO0503821 [0.6/150 1x/Week])Cohort 6 (RO0503821 [0.6/150 1x/2 Week])Total
Mean50.2 ± 9.9058.6 ± 12.6453.8 ± 12.7262.8 ± 15.7660.1 ± 11.8962.5 ± 10.7758.00 ± 12.91
Gender
Gender(Participants)Cohort 1 (RO0503821 [0.25/150 1x/Week])Cohort 2 (RO0503821 [0.25/150 1x/2 Week])Cohort 3 (RO0503821 [0.4/150 1x/Week])Cohort 4 (RO0503821 [0.4/150 1x/2week])Cohort 5 (RO0503821 [0.6/150 1x/Week])Cohort 6 (RO0503821 [0.6/150 1x/2 Week])Total
Female28666331
Male13799101260
08

Study locations

14 sites
  • Birmingham, Alabama 35211, United States
  • Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • Maywood, Illinois 60153, United States
  • Louisville, Kentucky 40202-1718, United States
  • Detroit, Michigan 48202-2689, United States
  • Detroit, Michigan 48236, United States
  • Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430, United States
  • Las Vegas, Nevada 89106, United States
  • Paterson, New Jersey 07503, United States
  • Brooklyn, New York 11203, United States
  • Mineola, New York 11501, United States
  • New York, New York 10128, United States
  • Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
  • Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 20, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00048035
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 25, 2002
Start date
Mar 2002
Primary completion
Jun 2005
Completion
Jun 2005
Results posted
Dec 20, 2016
Last update
Dec 20, 2016

Study contacts

Clinical Trials
study director · Hoffmann-La Roche
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion