CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00001519Updated Mar 4, 2008

Oxygen Uptake Kinetics During Recovery From Maximal and Submaximal Exercise

An observational study in Healthy, sponsored by National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC). Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2008-03-04.

Sponsored by National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Enrollment
5
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Measurements of dynamic changes in oxygen uptake (VO2 kinetics) during recovery from exercise may describe regulatory control of oxygen transport and utilization and have greater reliability and less inherent risk than assessment of maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) in patients for whom exercise is limited by pain, excessive fatigue, dyspnea and motivation. The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate the effect of exercise intensity on the time constant describing changes in VO2 (tauVO2) during recovery from one minute of constant work rate exercise. Five normal healthy volunteers ages 18 and older will perform a progressive maximal aerobic exercise test, using a cycle ergometer, to determine VO2max and lactate threshold (LT) estimated by gas exchange. Each subject will also complete a series of maximal constant work rate tests and submaximal constant work rate tests at 80% LT and 50% of the difference between LT and VO2max (50% delta). Breath by breath variability and VO2 span will be used to determine the number of constant work rate test repetitions, for each subject for each exercise intensity, needed to establish confidence in tauVO2. A mean response profile of VO2 recovery kinetics for each exercise intensity will be analyzed using non-linear regression to determine tauVO2. To examine the effect of exercise intensity on tauVO2, one way analysis of variance will be used to determine whether differences exist among maximal and submaximal (80% LT and 50% delta) time constants. We hypothesize that there will be no significant differences among time constants for VO2 during recovery from maximal and submaximal constant work rate exercise lasting one minute. The results of this study are expected to provide increased understanding of the measurement of VO2 kinetics during recovery.

Read the detailed description

Measurements of dynamic changes in oxygen uptake (VO2 kinetics) during recovery from exercise may describe regulatory control of oxygen transport and utilization and have greater reliability and less inherent risk than assessment of maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) in patients for whom exercise is limited by pain, excessive fatigue, dyspnea and motivation. The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate the effect of exercise intensity on the time constant describing changes in VO2 (tauVO2) during recovery from one minute of constant work rate exercise. Five normal healthy volunteers ages 18 and older will perform a progressive maximal aerobic exercise test, using a cycle ergometer, to determine VO2max and lactate threshold (LT) estimated by gas exchange. Each subject will also complete a series of maximal constant work rate tests and submaximal constant work rate tests at 80% LT and 50% of the difference between LT and VO2max (50% delta). Breath by breath variability and VO2 span will be used to determine the number of constant work rate test repetitions, for each subject for each exercise intensity, needed to establish confidence in tauVO2. A mean response profile of VO2 recovery kinetics for each exercise intensity will be analyzed using non-linear regression to determine tauVO2. To examine the effect of exercise intensity on tauVO2, one way analysis of variance will be used to determine whether differences exist among maximal and submaximal (80% LT and 50% delta) time constants. We hypothesize that there will be no significant differences among time constants for VO2 during recovery from maximal and submaximal constant work rate exercise lasting one minute. The results of this study are expected to provide increased understanding of the measurement of VO2 kinetics during recovery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy

Keywords

  • Exercise
  • Exercise Intensity
  • Non-Linear Regression
  • Oxygen Uptake
  • Recovery
  • Subject Comparison
  • Time Constant
  • VO2
03

In context

Lead sponsor

National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC) is the lead sponsor of 367 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Of its 22 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 18 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Normal healthy subjects ages 18 and older.

05

Study design

Enrollment
5 participants
06

Study locations

1 site
  • Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center (CC)
    Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Sietsema KE, Cooper DM, Perloff JK, Rosove MH, Child JS, Canobbio MM, Whipp BJ, Wasserman K. Dynamics of oxygen uptake during exercise in adults with cyanotic congenital heart disease. Circulation. 1986 Jun;73(6):1137-44. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.73.6.1137. PubMed 3698248 ↗
  • Hughson RL. Alterations in the oxygen deficit-oxygen debt relationships with beta-adrenergic receptor blockade in man. J Physiol. 1984 Apr;349:375-87. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015161. PubMed 6429319 ↗
  • Powers SK, Dodd S, Beadle RE. Oxygen uptake kinetics in trained athletes differing in VO2max. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1985;54(3):306-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00426150. PubMed 4065115 ↗
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 4, 2008, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00001519
Lead sponsor
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)
First posted
Dec 10, 2002
Start date
Jun 1996
Completion
Apr 2001
Last update
Mar 4, 2008
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2000. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion