ClinicalTrials.gg
Drug

Human NEUREGULIN-1 recombinant (177-237) clinical trials

Also written rhNRG-1 and Neucardin.

studies test it
9
open now
1
in phase 3
8
first study started
2010

How each study uses human NEUREGULIN-1 recombinant (177-237) is sorted by a rule, right about nine times in ten. Readers can ask us to read every study one by one.Ask us to read each study

Get an email when these change. Save the human NEUREGULIN-1 recombinant (177-237) studies recruiting or about to start — once a week, free: studies that open, close, add sites or post results.

Watch these studies
See an example email

Example · made-up studies

Breast cancer · Recruiting: 2 came in, 3 changed

What changed in your saved searches, Oct 31 – Nov 6:

A study of drug A after surgery for early breast cancer

Came in · now Recruiting

Drug B with hormone therapy in advanced breast cancer

Changed

· Sites: 4 added, including Seoul and Busan

· Enrollment: 300 → 450 participants

Exercise during chemotherapy

Now Active, not recruiting

One email a week for all your saved searches. Stop any time.

Approvals

The first approval found in each region, with its record

United States
Not in FDA's approval records
European Union
Not in EMA's list of EU-wide authorisations

From FDA's Drugs@FDA and Purple Book (through openFDA) and the European Medicines Agency, files of Sept 2026 and 27 Oct 2026. National approvals in Europe and other countries are not included. How this is worked out

How studies write it

Studies that test it under each name

Brand

Neucardin
4

Other names

rhNRG-1
6

Studies by the year they started

9 studies that test it; most in 2010 (2)

Studies that test human NEUREGULIN-1 recombinant (177-237), by start year
YearStudies
20102
20112
20122
20181
20201
20231

By phase

A phase 1/2 study counts in both.

Phase 2
1
Phase 3
8

Who runs them

Industry 9 · Other 0

Zensun Sci. & Tech. Co., Ltd. (9)

Studies

Open first, then newest update. How each study uses human NEUREGULIN-1 recombinant (177-237) is read from its arms, and is right about nine times in ten. Ask us to read each study. These are the studies that list it as an intervention; a search of ClinicalTrials.gov also finds studies that mention it only in a description, such as earlier treatment.

Testing it · 9